Bob in Mich Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 1 minute ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: It was a busy week. Actual Trump calendar for the week in question: Monday, 1/4/21 9am - 7pm Tour of Moscow with V Tuesday, 1/5/21 9am - 1pm Punch puppies at Pet Smart 1pm - 3pm Tweet 3pm - 7pm Coveffee with Melanie Wednesday, 1/6/21 OPEN Thursday, 1/7/21 9am - 9pm Discuss Kraken Unleashing w/ Rudy Friday, 1/8/21 Winter Break Begins Ah-ha! Smoking gun!!! Lol
Bob in Mich Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 (edited) 16 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: He publicly threatened Supreme Court justices….didn’t they cover that in Michigan? I am no lawyer but if what Schumer did is worthy of charging, then charge him. From what I know, those don’t seem like equivalent actions but if so, charge him See, that should be a simple decision. Those proven guilty should be punished. No asking what tribe he is in or what that would mean politically. Edited June 13, 2022 by Bob in Mich 3
BillStime Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 14 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: He publicly threatened Supreme Court justices….didn’t they cover that in Michigan? It's amazing how quickly the right wing talking points are circulated across all channels online... gotta commend the cult when they need to quickly rally behind their new boogeyman.
All_Pro_Bills Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 1 minute ago, BillStime said: It's amazing how quickly the right wing talking points are circulated across all channels online... gotta commend the cult when they need to quickly rally behind their new boogeyman. I think its more likely the majority of posters here across the political and social spectrum are capable of producing their own conclusions generated through logic and critical thinking rather than sitting in front of the TV watching or websites and waiting for CNN. MSNBC, FOX, or some other outlet for their marching orders on narratives and "talking points". 1 1
BillStime Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 Truth Social is anything but truth + social - lmao 1
B-Man Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 33 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: I think its more likely the majority of posters here across the political and social spectrum are capable of producing their own conclusions generated through logic and critical thinking rather than sitting in front of the TV watching or websites and waiting for CNN. MSNBC, FOX, or some other outlet for their marching orders on narratives and "talking points". That is correct. January 6th Committee Previews Another Dud in the Second Hearing https://redstate.com/bonchie/2022/06/13/january-6th-committee-previews-another-dud-in-the-second-hearing-n577933 1
Doc Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 1 hour ago, Bob in Mich said: You dare who? Go ahead and tell us the rest of your threat. ...the November elections will be even more epic. 1
Tiberius Posted June 13, 2022 Author Posted June 13, 2022 1 hour ago, Doc said: ...the November elections will be even more epic. Was the election stolen in 2020?
SoCal Deek Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 2 hours ago, Bob in Mich said: I am no lawyer but if what Schumer did is worthy of charging, then charge him. From what I know, those don’t seem like equivalent actions but if so, charge him See, that should be a simple decision. Those proven guilty should be punished. No asking what tribe he is in or what that would mean politically. And there in lies the difference. Under Pelosi the Democrats have turned politics into a true blood sport. I fear the Republicans are going to be forced to do the same. It’s not good. 1
Buftex Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 2 hours ago, B-Man said: That is correct. Ironic, coming from PPP's very own ditto machine 1
Doc Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: Was the election stolen in 2020? It very well may have been. It was the least secure election in modern times, given the last-minute changes. But since it's hard to prove fraud since ID isn't checked at a lot of places, we have to rely on changes to the election laws. And despite all the histrionics by the Dems over "voter suppression!" they're actually doing the opposite. 1
Tiberius Posted June 13, 2022 Author Posted June 13, 2022 @T master Evil walks with thugs Here is his own campaign lawyer
B-Man Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 WHAT IF THEY THREW A SHOW TRIAL AND NOBODY SHOWED? Even Rachel Maddow Isn’t Drinking the J6 Committee’s Kool-Aid. https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2022/06/13/what-even-rachel-maddow-isnt-drinking-the-j6-committees-kool-aid-n1605087 1
ALF Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 (edited) Sandy @JAH14811221 “I try to do good in the world not out of fear for hell or reward of heaven, but because it feels better not to be an #######.” a--hole Edited June 13, 2022 by ALF 1
Tiberius Posted June 13, 2022 Author Posted June 13, 2022 12 minutes ago, BillStime said: He still looks drunk
Nineforty Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 5 hours ago, SoCal Deek said: All very well said. So, Schumer is guilty as well then? No? Dont respond to this douche turds WHATABOUTISM. They cant stick to the topic so they spin and spin and spin. https://www.google.com/search?q=define+whataboutism&oq=define+whataboutism&aqs=chrome..69i57.3279j1j7&client=ms-android-att-us-revc&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8 1
Tenhigh Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 2 hours ago, Bob in Mich said: I am no lawyer but if what Schumer did is worthy of charging, then charge him. From what I know, those don’t seem like equivalent actions but if so, charge him See, that should be a simple decision. Those proven guilty should be punished. No asking what tribe he is in or what that would mean politically. Bob, where is anyone here saying that people who broke the law shouldn't be prosecuted?
Bob in Mich Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 5 minutes ago, Tenhigh said: Bob, where is anyone here saying that people who broke the law shouldn't be prosecuted? Well, without naming names, almost all of the folks minimizing the seriousness of the J6 event or denying the intended goal of that event are essentially advocating that we ignore the central players’ guilt in orchestrating the event. They don’t want an investigation in my opinion because they don’t want further accountability 1 1
Recommended Posts