leh-nerd skin-erd Posted April 1, 2022 Posted April 1, 2022 18 minutes ago, BillStime said: Irrelevant. Please point where in the Constitution a 10 day delay is permissible. thanks I wasn't clear. The only thing relevant to my question was your perspective on legal maneuvering to delay certification. To your second point, your question is presumptuous and ambiguous.
BillStime Posted April 1, 2022 Posted April 1, 2022 4 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: I wasn't clear. The only thing relevant to my question was your perspective on legal maneuvering to delay certification. To your second point, your question is presumptuous and ambiguous. So you can't point to the statute in the Constitution that allows for a 10 day delay? Got it. smfh
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted April 1, 2022 Posted April 1, 2022 5 minutes ago, BillStime said: So you can't point to the statute in the Constitution that allows for a 10 day delay? Got it. smfh Dude, you're pussyfooting around a question about whether or not you're comfortable with legal maneuvering. There's no trick question in play, resolution through our civil justice system is a hallmark of our way of life. When you syfh, do you hear rattling? 1
BillStime Posted April 1, 2022 Posted April 1, 2022 4 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Dude, you're pussyfooting around a question about whether or not you're comfortable with legal maneuvering. There's no trick question in play, resolution through our civil justice system is a hallmark of our way of life. When you syfh, do you hear rattling? I know Lenny - the GQP is always above the law.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted April 1, 2022 Posted April 1, 2022 15 minutes ago, BillStime said: I know Lenny - the GQP is always above the law. Well, no, Billsy, that's a separate issue altogether. If your safe space is dealing in absolutes, we can do that. The GQP should be prosecuted when the GQP is involved in criminal activity. I don't think the GQP should be prosecuted, harassed or threatened when there is no criminal activity. That's where we probably disagree. 17 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: Wasn’t Bush Gore contested? Or did dream that? Of course. I don't recall anyone lobbying for the Gore team to be prosecuted for questioning the sanctity of our elections, or sowing seeds of discontent. Even though it's clear W prevailed on election day, sometimes these things are litigated.
Tiberius Posted April 1, 2022 Author Posted April 1, 2022 4 hours ago, JDHillFan said: Clearly I am punching above my intellectual weight class and am outmatched here so I am going to ask for your help. Will you please point out the part of the conversation that led you to that conclusion? It’s flying right past me. Thank you in advance for a helping hand. The liar got an invite from THE liar
OrangeBills Posted April 1, 2022 Posted April 1, 2022 19 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Well, no, Billsy, that's a separate issue altogether. If your safe space is dealing in absolutes, we can do that. The GQP should be prosecuted when the GQP is involved in criminal activity. I don't think the GQP should be prosecuted, harassed or threatened when there is no criminal activity. That's where we probably disagree. Of course. I don't recall anyone lobbying for the Gore team to be prosecuted for questioning the sanctity of our elections, or sowing seeds of discontent. Even though it's clear W prevailed on election day, sometimes these things are litigated. Well of course, in that case it was the Democrats challenging...they are allowed to do that. Because, um, they are on the right side of History, that's why
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted April 1, 2022 Posted April 1, 2022 42 minutes ago, OrangeBills said: Well of course, in that case it was the Democrats challenging...they are allowed to do that. Because, um, they are on the right side of History, that's why 1
SoCal Deek Posted April 7, 2022 Posted April 7, 2022 1 hour ago, BillStime said: Knowing Trump, he will run them in circles. If the Committee's smart, they'll threaten to, but never actually call him in. Just like Joe should've never let Obama steal the spotlight.
Demongyz Posted April 7, 2022 Posted April 7, 2022 3 hours ago, SoCal Deek said: Knowing Trump, he will run them in circles. If the Committee's smart, they'll threaten to, but never actually call him in. Just like Joe should've never let Obama steal the spotlight. They will never bring Trump in. NEVER! They would get their asses kicked to the moon, and the coverage would be so intense, they couldn't get away with their lies. 2
Orlando Buffalo Posted April 7, 2022 Posted April 7, 2022 7 hours ago, BillStime said: That would be great, he would explain he asked for National Guard troops and others said no. He would then ask why he was overruled and the entire committee would shut down. 2 1
Orlando Buffalo Posted April 9, 2022 Posted April 9, 2022 1 hour ago, BillStime said: You know as well as I do that anything that is a CNN exclusive for more than 24 hours is complete garbage. When others report it I will take a look. 1 1
BillStime Posted April 9, 2022 Posted April 9, 2022 14 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said: You know as well as I do that anything that is a CNN exclusive for more than 24 hours is complete garbage. When others report it I will take a look. After the election, Don received numerous messages from supporters and others. Given the date, this message likely originated from someone else and was forwarded."
Recommended Posts