SoCal Deek Posted March 4, 2022 Posted March 4, 2022 20 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Sure it is. Just like Hitler's Beer Hall Putsch was a first try, so was Jan 6 Interesting take. So what EXACTLY is this committee doing? I thought you said they were upholding democracy. If true, shouldn’t they be looking into the voter issues that the Trump supporters were upset about? What’s there to look into with the people who entered the Capitol? Has ANYONE opined that those people were right in what they did? This sounds like the Mueller Report all over again where when asked if he look into the Steele Dossier…he said nope we weren’t looking at that. Sounds to me like there are some ROOT CAUSES not being uncovered….hmmm? 1 1
Chef Jim Posted March 4, 2022 Posted March 4, 2022 5 hours ago, SoCal Deek said: I made the same observation after the super bowl here in Los Angeles…there sure were a lot of people from Cincinnati here that weekend! Very curious….no? Reminds me when the Bills played the SB in Pasadena. I was the restaurant Chef at the Hilton in Long Beach. A tour from Mexico was staying there. When the bus left for the game most were wearing Bills gear. I asked why Buffalo. They all shouted TORO TORO! 😂
BillStime Posted March 4, 2022 Posted March 4, 2022 1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said: Interesting take. So what EXACTLY is this committee doing? I thought you said they were upholding democracy. If true, shouldn’t they be looking into the voter issues that the Trump supporters were upset about? What’s there to look into with the people who entered the Capitol? Has ANYONE opined that those people were right in what they did? This sounds like the Mueller Report all over again where when asked if he look into the Steele Dossier…he said nope we weren’t looking at that. Sounds to me like there are some ROOT CAUSES not being uncovered….hmmm? The 61 failed election fraud lawsuits wasn’t enough for to swallow your pride and the BIG LIE? Too damn bad Meanwhile: back to the investigation: Authoritarians always think they are above the laws.
Demongyz Posted March 4, 2022 Posted March 4, 2022 1 hour ago, BillStime said: The 61 failed election fraud lawsuits wasn’t enough for to swallow your pride and the BIG LIE? Too damn bad Meanwhile: back to the investigation: Authoritarians always think they are above the laws. What if Pence agreed? Do you think that Trump would have remained president? Honestly, how dumb are all of you?
BillStime Posted March 4, 2022 Posted March 4, 2022 10 minutes ago, Demongyz said: What if Pence agreed? Do you think that Trump would have remained president? Honestly, how dumb are all of you? Not dumb enough to be fooled by Conald like you precious!
SoCal Deek Posted March 4, 2022 Posted March 4, 2022 1 hour ago, BillStime said: The 61 failed election fraud lawsuits wasn’t enough for to swallow your pride and the BIG LIE? Too damn bad Meanwhile: back to the investigation: Authoritarians always think they are above the laws. The Committee isn’t a law enforcement entity as your blood thirst would imply. Tibs says their sole purpose is to protect democracy. I’m all for that! Are they looking into the protocols that were used to change election regulations without proper legislative action? Hmmm? When does the protecting democracy start? After the witch hunting ends? 3 1
BillStime Posted March 4, 2022 Posted March 4, 2022 2 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: The Committee isn’t a law enforcement entity as your blood thirst would imply. Tibs says their sole purpose is to protect democracy. I’m all for that! Are they looking into the protocols that were used to change election regulations without proper legislative action? Hmmm? When does the protecting democracy start? After the witch hunting ends? lmao - nice job deek - making the case for H.R.1 - For the People Act of 2021 😍
Demongyz Posted March 4, 2022 Posted March 4, 2022 56 minutes ago, BillStime said: Not dumb enough to be fooled by Conald like you precious! Dumb dumb dumb.
Doc Posted March 5, 2022 Posted March 5, 2022 10 hours ago, Tiberius said: Not enough. Spending on defending our democratic institutions is worth it Should have spent more on security that day. When will we finally get to the bottom of who refused additional security and why? In any case, the majority of people believe it was a protest that went too far. And they don't care about this committee. 2
All_Pro_Bills Posted March 5, 2022 Posted March 5, 2022 (edited) 9 hours ago, Doc said: Should have spent more on security that day. When will we finally get to the bottom of who refused additional security and why? In any case, the majority of people believe it was a protest that went too far. And they don't care about this committee. Extra security was not provided because the goal was to let the protest happen and let things get out of hand. With or without help from federal agency operatives inside the demonstrations encouraging or participating. The silence in the face of questions why security was "standard" in the face of 100,000+ protesters expected to express their dis-satisfaction at the election results and process is deafening. Simply, experienced and seasoned security specialists and leadership at the Capitol would never have allowed this event to get out of control unless ordered to stand down. Only a handful of officials have the authority to give that order. Notably the office of the Speaker of the House. But don't get too excited. You won't see any subpoenas issued for their testimony. Identifying facts and the truth is not high on the list of the Committee's primary objectives. What is on their list of objectives is using the event as the pretext for an investigation and provide conclusions to push for new legislation outlawing criticism and dissent to government. Demonizing and silencing political opposition. Protecting government from the people, not protecting the people's democracy. Just looking at the cast of grifters and charlatans that compose the Committee provide obvious clues to their intent. Edited March 5, 2022 by All_Pro_Bills 1
Doc Posted March 5, 2022 Posted March 5, 2022 1 hour ago, All_Pro_Bills said: Extra security was not provided because the goal was to let the protest happen and let things get out of hand. With or without help from federal agency operatives inside the demonstrations encouraging or participating. The silence in the face of questions why security was "standard" in the face of 100,000+ protesters expected to express their dis-satisfaction at the election results and process is deafening. Simply, experienced and seasoned security specialists and leadership at the Capitol would never have allowed this event to get out of control unless ordered to stand down. Only a handful of officials have the authority to give that order. Notably the office of the Speaker of the House. But don't get too excited. You won't see any subpoenas issued for their testimony. Identifying facts and the truth is not high on the list of the Committee's primary objectives. What is on their list of objectives is using the event as the pretext for an investigation and provide conclusions to push for new legislation outlawing criticism and dissent to government. Demonizing and silencing political opposition. Protecting government from the people, not protecting the people's democracy. Just looking at the cast of grifters and charlatans that compose the Committee provide obvious clues to their intent. What about when both Houses flip next year? 1
Westside Posted March 5, 2022 Posted March 5, 2022 20 minutes ago, Doc said: What about when both Houses flip next year? Impeach the imposter in office and start cleaning house. But I doubt the repugs would do that. They all are crooked. 1
Orlando Buffalo Posted March 18, 2022 Posted March 18, 2022 On 3/16/2022 at 8:20 PM, BillStime said: Does the NYT know it's audience better than anyone? Just make a loud headline that has some minor resemblance to a fact for those too dumb to understand. Billstime how many Dems are discussing the 25th amendment today and everyday in regards to Biden?
BillStime Posted March 18, 2022 Posted March 18, 2022 3 hours ago, Buffalo Timmy said: Does the NYT know it's audience better than anyone? Just make a loud headline that has some minor resemblance to a fact for those too dumb to understand. Billstime how many Dems are discussing the 25th amendment today and everyday in regards to Biden?
BillsFanNC Posted March 20, 2022 Posted March 20, 2022 People like @BillStime Wastes of skin pieces of *****. 1 1
BillStime Posted March 20, 2022 Posted March 20, 2022 3 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: People like @BillStime Wastes of skin pieces of *****. Um, ok big guy.... lmao Classic DR - trigged and starting to meltdown like he always does when he encounters a speedbump that gets in his way of GOING OVERBOARD trying to convince his lemmings that Conald is a victim here... Give it up and go back to your safe place and spew the BS there. 1
BillStime Posted March 23, 2022 Posted March 23, 2022 Why does the cult always think they are above the law? 1
Recommended Posts