B-Man Posted December 20, 2021 Posted December 20, 2021 THERE WASN’T ONE, AND THERE WON’T BE ONE: Washington Post, Leftist Generals Stoke Hysteria About a 2024 ‘Insurrection’ 😂 The Jan. 6 “insurrection” hasn’t worked out quite the way the Democrats obviously hoped: Trump wasn’t convicted in his second Stalinist impeachment show trial, no one has actually been charged with orchestrating or participating in any “insurrection,” and the witch hunt to demonize and marginalize Trump and his supporters as “white supremacists” who pose an imminent threat to our “democracy” (it’s a republic, folks) has so far been a huge fizzle. But three ferociously partisan retired generals are thinking ahead, publishing an op-ed in the Washington Post Friday, which warns that those dastardly Trump supporters would certainly stage an “insurrection” in 2024, so the military must start preparing now to “preserve our democracy,” that is, destroy our republic. https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/robert-spencer/2021/12/19/washington-post-leftist-generals-stoke-hysteria-about-a-2024-insurrection-n1542872
BillStime Posted December 20, 2021 Posted December 20, 2021 10 minutes ago, B-Man said: THERE WASN’T ONE, AND THERE WON’T BE ONE: Washington Post, Leftist Generals Stoke Hysteria About a 2024 ‘Insurrection’ 😂 The Jan. 6 “insurrection” hasn’t worked out quite the way the Democrats obviously hoped: Trump wasn’t convicted in his second Stalinist impeachment show trial, no one has actually been charged with orchestrating or participating in any “insurrection,” and the witch hunt to demonize and marginalize Trump and his supporters as “white supremacists” who pose an imminent threat to our “democracy” (it’s a republic, folks) has so far been a huge fizzle. But three ferociously partisan retired generals are thinking ahead, publishing an op-ed in the Washington Post Friday, which warns that those dastardly Trump supporters would certainly stage an “insurrection” in 2024, so the military must start preparing now to “preserve our democracy,” that is, destroy our republic. https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/robert-spencer/2021/12/19/washington-post-leftist-generals-stoke-hysteria-about-a-2024-insurrection-n1542872 Love how this is all well documented and we can revisit in a few years if PPP still exists.
Doc Posted December 20, 2021 Posted December 20, 2021 1 hour ago, B-Man said: THERE WASN’T ONE, AND THERE WON’T BE ONE: Washington Post, Leftist Generals Stoke Hysteria About a 2024 ‘Insurrection’ 😂 The Jan. 6 “insurrection” hasn’t worked out quite the way the Democrats obviously hoped: Trump wasn’t convicted in his second Stalinist impeachment show trial, no one has actually been charged with orchestrating or participating in any “insurrection,” and the witch hunt to demonize and marginalize Trump and his supporters as “white supremacists” who pose an imminent threat to our “democracy” (it’s a republic, folks) has so far been a huge fizzle. But three ferociously partisan retired generals are thinking ahead, publishing an op-ed in the Washington Post Friday, which warns that those dastardly Trump supporters would certainly stage an “insurrection” in 2024, so the military must start preparing now to “preserve our democracy,” that is, destroy our republic. https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/robert-spencer/2021/12/19/washington-post-leftist-generals-stoke-hysteria-about-a-2024-insurrection-n1542872 Oh, there probably will be one in 2024, when the Dems lose. Except it will be spun as something else. 1
B-Man Posted December 20, 2021 Posted December 20, 2021 Trump: In retrospect, he'd ensure that National Guard troops were deployed on January 6 Former President Donald Trump said Saturday that if he could do it over again, he would do more to ensure that National Guard troops were deployed on Jan. 6 to prevent the storming of the U.S. Capitol. In a public question-and-answer session with former Fox News personality Bill O’Reilly, Trump said he had recommended a day before the riot that 10,000 troops be deployed at the Capitol, but it didn’t happen. “I would have insisted they had proper protection,” https://hotair.com/karen-townsend/2021/12/19/trump-in-retrospect-hed-ensure-that-national-guard-troops-were-deployed-on-january-6-n436551
B-Man Posted December 21, 2021 Posted December 21, 2021 (edited) Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha........ Capitol riot police officer Michael Fanone resigns from the force, joins CNN as a contributor https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2021/12/20/capitol-riot-police-officer-michael-fanone-resigns-from-the-force-joins-cnn-as-a-contributor/ Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha ! The Jan 6 Channel ! ! ! Edited December 21, 2021 by B-Man 1
B-Man Posted December 21, 2021 Posted December 21, 2021 Florida Democrat on January 6 committee announces she won't run for reelection "I've decided not to seek another term in Congress. Serving Central Florida has been the honor of my life, but it's also been incredibly challenging for my family and me," Murphy said in a tweet, which also featured a video announcement of her plans. Murphy, a moderate Democrat who has represented her district for five years, has been a leading voice in shaping the centrist wing of the Democratic Party. She was one of six Democrats to unseat a Republican incumbent in 2016, and currently serves as co-chairwoman of the moderate caucus, Blue Dog Coalition. Murphy was the first Vietnamese-American woman to serve in Congress and also currently serves in House leadership as a chief deputy whip. https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/20/politics/stephanie-murphy-not-running-reelection/index.html Perhaps after a stint on the "commission" she realized there is no room for moderates in today's Democrat Party. .
BillStime Posted December 21, 2021 Posted December 21, 2021 Trump is losing it…. look what a couple text messages did to the SOB and his cult. And he knows NY AG is coming for him - poor guy lmao
Doc Posted December 21, 2021 Posted December 21, 2021 3 hours ago, B-Man said: Florida Democrat on January 6 committee announces she won't run for reelection "I've decided not to seek another term in Congress. Serving Central Florida has been the honor of my life, but it's also been incredibly challenging for my family and me," Murphy said in a tweet, which also featured a video announcement of her plans. Murphy, a moderate Democrat who has represented her district for five years, has been a leading voice in shaping the centrist wing of the Democratic Party. She was one of six Democrats to unseat a Republican incumbent in 2016, and currently serves as co-chairwoman of the moderate caucus, Blue Dog Coalition. Murphy was the first Vietnamese-American woman to serve in Congress and also currently serves in House leadership as a chief deputy whip. https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/20/politics/stephanie-murphy-not-running-reelection/index.html Perhaps after a stint on the "commission" she realized there is no room for moderates in today's Democrat Party. Yup. Doesn't like having Marxism forced on her. 1
B-Man Posted December 22, 2021 Posted December 22, 2021 (edited) Michael Flynn vs Granny Boxwine—Make Extra Popcorn. “It’s impossible to predict anything anymore, but I still feel that none of this is going to turn out the way the Democrats are envisioning it in their mentally disturbed Trump hate fever-dream.” https://pjmedia.com/columns/stephen-kruiser/2021/12/22/the-morning-briefing-michael-flynn-vs-granny-boxwine-make-extra-popcorn-n1543476 Michael Flynn sues Nancy Pelosi and Jan. 6 committee by Ryan King https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/michael-flynn-sues-nancy-pelosi-and-jan-6-committee “Flynn served as Trump’s National Security Adviser for less than a month before he resigned under a cloud in Feb. 2017, having become a central focus of the FAKE Russian collusion hoax. He wasn’t serving in the Trump administration in any capacity on Jan. 6, 2020 and had not done so for nearly three years. But that didn’t stop the rabid partisans of the Jan. 6 committee from trying to rope him into something he had absolutely nothing to do with.” Edited December 22, 2021 by B-Man
Orlando Buffalo Posted December 22, 2021 Posted December 22, 2021 At this point I truly think that the entire purpose of the committee is to stretch this out until just before the elections, possibly September, make vague lies about not being able to do their jobs do to obstruction, and then make more dishonest comments through the press that can't be proven wrong because there is not information. 1
SoCal Deek Posted December 22, 2021 Posted December 22, 2021 8 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said: At this point I truly think that the entire purpose of the committee is to stretch this out until just before the elections, possibly September, make vague lies about not being able to do their jobs do to obstruction, and then make more dishonest comments through the press that can't be proven wrong because there is not information. Really? Ya think? No! Adam Schiff would never put his stamp on something that dishonest! He’s super trustworthy! 1
Doc Posted December 23, 2021 Posted December 23, 2021 17 hours ago, Buffalo Timmy said: At this point I truly think that the entire purpose of the committee is to stretch this out until just before the elections, possibly September, make vague lies about not being able to do their jobs do to obstruction, and then make more dishonest comments through the press that can't be proven wrong because there is not information. Of course this is what they are (and always were) doing. At first it was to ensure Trump didn't run again, but with the Brandon Administration being such a major CF, and this is all they have, it's even more incumbent on them to try and stem the red wave that's coming in less than 11 months. But most people are onto their ruse and/or don't GAF, when stuff like their money, health and general competency/optics is far more important. 1 1
BillStime Posted December 28, 2021 Posted December 28, 2021 Nothing to see here “We spent a lot of time lining up over 100 congressmen, including some senators. It started out perfectly. At 1 p.m., Gosar and Cruz did exactly what was expected of them,” Navarro told The Daily Beast. “It was a perfect plan. And it all predicated on peace and calm on Capitol Hill. We didn’t even need any protestors, because we had over 100 congressmen committed to it.” My role was to provide the receipts for the 100 congressmen or so who would make their cases… who could rely in part on the body of evidence I'd collected,” he told The Daily Beast. “To lay the legal predicate for the actions to be taken.” (Ultimately, states have not found any evidence of electoral fraud above the norm, which is exceedingly small.) The next phase of the plan was up to Bannon, Navarro describes in his memoir, In Trump Time. “Steve Bannon’s role was to figure out how to use this information—what he called ‘receipts’—to overturn the election result. That’s how Steve had come up with the Green Bay Sweep idea,” he wrote.
Orlando Buffalo Posted December 28, 2021 Posted December 28, 2021 59 minutes ago, BillStime said: Nothing to see here “We spent a lot of time lining up over 100 congressmen, including some senators. It started out perfectly. At 1 p.m., Gosar and Cruz did exactly what was expected of them,” Navarro told The Daily Beast. “It was a perfect plan. And it all predicated on peace and calm on Capitol Hill. We didn’t even need any protestors, because we had over 100 congressmen committed to it.” My role was to provide the receipts for the 100 congressmen or so who would make their cases… who could rely in part on the body of evidence I'd collected,” he told The Daily Beast. “To lay the legal predicate for the actions to be taken.” (Ultimately, states have not found any evidence of electoral fraud above the norm, which is exceedingly small.) The next phase of the plan was up to Bannon, Navarro describes in his memoir, In Trump Time. “Steve Bannon’s role was to figure out how to use this information—what he called ‘receipts’—to overturn the election result. That’s how Steve had come up with the Green Bay Sweep idea,” he wrote. "This last-minute maneuvering never had any chance of actually decertifying the election results on its own, a point that Navarro quickly acknowledges. But their hope was to run the clock as long as possible to increase public pressure on then-Vice President Mike Pence" you missed the part where this was all a legal maneuver, might not be a good look but still more proof the committee is out here simply for those too stupid to read 5 whole paragraphs. 1
BillStime Posted December 28, 2021 Posted December 28, 2021 4 hours ago, Buffalo Timmy said: "This last-minute maneuvering never had any chance of actually decertifying the election results on its own, a point that Navarro quickly acknowledges. But their hope was to run the clock as long as possible to increase public pressure on then-Vice President Mike Pence" you missed the part where this was all a legal maneuver, might not be a good look but still more proof the committee is out here simply for those too stupid to read 5 whole paragraphs. Thank you for driving the point home. The Trump plan was to create a mirage of public pressure via the fake news election fraud campaign that was launched prior to the election and then launch 60+ post election law suits by a bunch of pathetic lawyers - again - attempting to create this mirage of fraud and doubt in our institutions - and then when all else failed - Trump tried to put pressure on Pence by inciting an insurrection to retain power. And you snowflakes thoughts Watergate was bad? Idiots - every single one of you
Recommended Posts