Jump to content

The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

So are you trying to state that the stress caused by a riot that causes a stroke means the person died from the riot?

So if @B-Man pushes an old women down a flight of stairs and she has a heart attack, that would be death by natural causes? 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BillStime said:

 

 

This Tweet is misinformation and should have banned on Twitter as making up crap and posting it doesn't make it real.  But Libs don't get "Dorseyed" on twitter.  If the officer was "beaten" then it seems reasonable to expect the medical examiner would have noted any bruises and contusions and perhaps reached a different conclusion on the autopsy report.  Or is there some conspiracy to protect the insurrectionists inside the government? 

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

This Tweet is misinformation and should have banned on Twitter as making up crap and posting it doesn't make it real.  But Libs don't get "Dorseyed" on twitter.  If the officer was "beaten" then it seems reasonable to expect the medical examiner would have noted any bruises and contusions and perhaps reached a different conclusion on the autopsy report.  Or is there some conspiracy to protect the insurrectionists inside the government? 

 

 


Wait a minute - now you care about accuracy? Where have you been the past four years? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

So if @B-Man pushes an old women down a flight of stairs and she has a heart attack, that would be death by natural causes? 

 

 

 

1 hour ago, BillStime said:

 

 

 

 

You just won't learn.

 

Medical examiner Francisco J. Diaz told the Post that the autopsy found no evidence that Sicknick "suffered an allergic reaction to chemical irritants" and that there were no " internal or external injuries."

 

The stroke was not caused by "beating"............stop your lies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, B-Man said:

 

 

 

You just won't learn.

 

Medical examiner Francisco J. Diaz told the Post that the autopsy found no evidence that Sicknick "suffered an allergic reaction to chemical irritants" and that there were no " internal or external injuries."

 

The stroke was not caused by "beating"............stop your lies.

He would of dropped dead even if nothing happened, huh? Just a total coincidence? 

 

 

Ya right! You will say anything to defend Trump. Shameful! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

You just won't learn.

 

Medical examiner Francisco J. Diaz told the Post that the autopsy found no evidence that Sicknick "suffered an allergic reaction to chemical irritants" and that there were no " internal or external injuries."

 

The stroke was not caused by "beating"............stop your lies.


You do realize, Bonnie - that a failed coup attempt is still a coup attempt right?

 

You celebrating the death and outcome of a medical report on a Capitol policeman - who died that day as a result of your failed coup - brings NO comfort to his family and friends.

 

Its laughable watching you parade around here - basically spouting DR’s Twitter page - thinking you’re winning. 
 

You’ve lost. A long time ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Tragically Officer Brian Sicknick had an underlying condition, a blood clot lurking that he likely knew nothing about. Did the Democrats and media care about that? Did they care about his family? Did they care that they were knowingly peddling very false narratives? NO, because that was and IS the plan!

 

The media has been continually parroting the narrative so that we would ALL know that the very worst protest/riot/gathering was the one that took place on January 6, 2021. Any other riots and looting from the end of May ’til today? Nothing to see here, move along.

 

“But the gruesome story of Sicknick’s “murder” was too valuable to allow any questioning. It was weaponized over and over to depict the pro-Trump mob not as just violent but barbaric and murderous, because if Sicknick weren’t murdered by them, then nobody was (without Sicknick, the only ones killed were four pro-Trump supporters: two who died of a heart attack, one from an amphetamine overdose, and the other, Ashli Babbitt, who was shot point blank in the neck by Capitol Police despite being unarmed). So crucial was this fairy tale about Sicknick that it made its way into the official record of President Trump’s impeachment trial in the Senate, and they had Joe Biden himself recite from the script, even as clear facts mounted proving it was untrue.”

 

That’s right. It was a fairy tale peddled by the Democrat media establishment with all their might. They exploited Brian Sicknick and his service for their own tawdry goals. Too bad the truth finally saw the light of day. 

 

Exit question: When will we find out who shot Ashli Babbitt?

Edited by B-Man
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

Tragically Officer Brian Sicknick had an underlying condition, a blood clot lurking that he likely knew nothing about. Did the Democrats and media care about that? Did they care about his family? Did they care that they were knowingly peddling very false narratives? NO, because that was and IS the plan!

 

The media has been continually parroting the narrative so that we would ALL know that the very worst protest/riot/gathering was the one that took place on January 6, 2021. Any other riots and looting from the end of May ’til today? Nothing to see here, move along.

 

“But the gruesome story of Sicknick’s “murder” was too valuable to allow any questioning. It was weaponized over and over to depict the pro-Trump mob not as just violent but barbaric and murderous, because if Sicknick weren’t murdered by them, then nobody was (without Sicknick, the only ones killed were four pro-Trump supporters: two who died of a heart attack, one from an amphetamine overdose, and the other, Ashli Babbitt, who was shot point blank in the neck by Capitol Police despite being unarmed). So crucial was this fairy tale about Sicknick that it made its way into the official record of President Trump’s impeachment trial in the Senate, and they had Joe Biden himself recite from the script, even as clear facts mounted proving it was untrue.”

 

That’s right. It was a fairy tale peddled by the Democrat media establishment with all their might. They exploited Brian Sicknick and his service for their own tawdry goals. Too bad the truth finally saw the light of day. 

 

Exit question: When will we find out who shot Ashli Babbitt?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

Tragically Officer Brian Sicknick had an underlying condition, a blood clot lurking that he likely knew nothing about. Did the Democrats and media care about that? Did they care about his family? Did they care that they were knowingly peddling very false narratives? NO, because that was and IS the plan!

 

The media has been continually parroting the narrative so that we would ALL know that the very worst protest/riot/gathering was the one that took place on January 6, 2021. Any other riots and looting from the end of May ’til today? Nothing to see here, move along.

 

“But the gruesome story of Sicknick’s “murder” was too valuable to allow any questioning. It was weaponized over and over to depict the pro-Trump mob not as just violent but barbaric and murderous, because if Sicknick weren’t murdered by them, then nobody was (without Sicknick, the only ones killed were four pro-Trump supporters: two who died of a heart attack, one from an amphetamine overdose, and the other, Ashli Babbitt, who was shot point blank in the neck by Capitol Police despite being unarmed). So crucial was this fairy tale about Sicknick that it made its way into the official record of President Trump’s impeachment trial in the Senate, and they had Joe Biden himself recite from the script, even as clear facts mounted proving it was untrue.”

 

That’s right. It was a fairy tale peddled by the Democrat media establishment with all their might. They exploited Brian Sicknick and his service for their own tawdry goals. Too bad the truth finally saw the light of day. 

 

Exit question: When will we find out who shot Ashli Babbitt?

Didn’t Advil Babbitt die because her heart stopped? Nothing to do with her getting shot! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tiberius said:

So if @B-Man pushes an old women down a flight of stairs and she has a heart attack, that would be death by natural causes? 

 

 

 

Was there any physical violence against the officer?  

52 minutes ago, BillStime said:


You do realize, Bonnie - that a failed coup attempt is still a coup attempt right?

 

You celebrating the death and outcome of a medical report on a Capitol policeman - who died that day as a result of your failed coup - brings NO comfort to his family and friends.

 

Its laughable watching you parade around here - basically spouting DR’s Twitter page - thinking you’re winning. 
 

You’ve lost. A long time ago.

 

HIS failed coup?  B-Man...Dude?!?!  

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

He would of dropped dead even if nothing happened, huh? Just a total coincidence? 

 

 

Ya right! You will say anything to defend Trump. Shameful! 

Would have or would've, you monster!

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Didn’t Advil Babbitt die because her heart stopped? Nothing to do with her getting shot! 

 

 

Her name was Ashli Babbitt.

 

You can spout your childish bullsh*t all you want, but at least have the decency to get her name right.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, B-Man said:

You just won't learn.

 

Medical examiner Francisco J. Diaz told the Post that the autopsy found no evidence that Sicknick "suffered an allergic reaction to chemical irritants" and that there were no " internal or external injuries."

 

The stroke was not caused by "beating"............stop your lies.

 

He was "beaten" as much as this was an "armed insurrection."

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BillStime said:

in retrospect I am Glad and relieved the damage and death toll wasn't higher  on 1/6......The amount of damage that DIDN'T happen I'm grateful for. No bombings, no high velocity weaponry used on either side to quell or instigate the insurrection..I mean this could have been soooo much worse when you think about it. The police were overrun, the capitol was breached and any manner of destruction was indeed possible but didn't happen......Whew.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...