Jump to content

The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

The barricade that the driver rammed has been there for years, it was not part of the new fencing, and certainly the National guard did not add to any safety.

 

But leave it to you Tiberius, to again use someone's death to try and justify your own vile bias.

 

You are a very poor example of a human being.

 

 

 

 

Just heard on Fox News - Chad Pergram - Congressional Correspondent:

 

"Had this street been closed, two weeks ago like it was, this incident would not have happened at this checkpoint"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Just heard on Fox News - Chad Pergram - Congressional Correspondent:

 

"Had this street been closed, two weeks ago like it was, this incident would not have happened at this checkpoint"

 

 

So, keep all streets around the Capitol closed, even though they still have the barricades ?

 

You have less sense than Tibs.

 

Would it have happened at another checkpoint then ?

 

You don't know and neither do I.

 

If a deranged person wants to attack cops he will.  

 

When you politicize everything you give yourself away.

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, B-Man said:

 

 

So, keep all streets around the Capitol closed, even though they still have the barricades ?

 

You have less sense than Tibs.

 

Would it have happened at another checkpoint then ?

 

You don't know and neither do I.

 

If a deranged person wants to attack cops he will.  

 

When you politicize everything you give yourself away.

 

 

 

You get upstaged by your ANTI-AMERICAN terrorist party and its extreme followers EVERY SINGLE DAY.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Confronted with an argument,

 

answer with some sort of gibberish attack instead of really responding.

 

Standard billZtime procedure


LMAO - look in the freakn mirror bro.
 

You fall on your face every day here. Another one in over his head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

On 4/2/2021 at 3:52 PM, B-Man said:

 

 

Confronted with an argument,

 

answer with some sort of gibberish attack instead of really responding.

 

Standard billZtime procedure


Oh you don’t like my responses because the truth hurts? Yup.

 

You are continuously on the wrong side of every issue.

 

There is nothing to argue about a fence protecting the Capitol. Your team stormed the Capitol on Jan 6 and ruined it for everyone.
 

 

Edited by BillStime
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

The legal situation of the Jan 6th Capitol “insurrection” defendants

 

So far it seems that in the main they will be charged with trespassing:

 

“There is a natural cycle to an event like this,” the defense attorney added. “People will say it was the end of the world, then things will calm down, and they’ll begin looking at cases back on what people actually did.”

 

That’s no accident, of course. What’s left out of that statement is which “people” are saying what, and why. If the “event” is one that features leftists as the alleged perpetrators, the entire episode is trivialized and considered “mostly peaceful” even at the outset. But if it’s people on the right who stand accused, well that’s when the “end of the world” cries go out from the Democrats and their mouthpieces in the press.

 

That sets the narrative so that evidence that might later come out in a legal proceeding concerning what people actually did has already become irrelevant to the public. Even if no one or only a relatively few people end up being charged for their actions on January 6th, many Democrats will either say that proves that the legal system is biased in favor of the right and against the left, or they won’t even get the news at all. Either way, almost all will continue to think there was and still is a huge and dangerous insurrection afoot among people on the right, including all Trump supporters, and that just about anything is justified in order to stop it.

 

And prosecutors are facing pressure from judges to either back up their tough talk about sedition or put a lid on it. Michael Sherwin, the former lead Jan. 6 prosecutor, found himself rebuked by other senior prosecutors and Judge Amit Mehta last week for publicly flirting with the possibility of sedition charges when none had actually been leveled.

 

No matter what happens, I don’t think Biden or his spokespeople or any Democrat leader will ever admit this wasn’t an insurrection. Way too much is riding on that perception. They worked hard to plant that idea in the heads of the public, and it serves them in good stead. Why let facts get in the way?

 

 

https://www.thenewneo.com/2021/04/02/the-legal-situation-of-the-jan-6th-capitol-insurrection-defendants/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New York Times: Boehner lays blame for 'that bloody insurrection' at Trump's feet

 

Former House Speaker John Boehner said former President Donald Trump "incited that bloody insurrection" at the US Capitol and blamed his false election claims for the GOP losing control of Congress, according to excerpts from his forthcoming book obtained by The New York Times.

 

Republicans have wobbled over whether to embrace the 45th President's legacy as an electoral strategy, and Boehner's scathing rebuke amounts to the latest plea by the former de facto head of the GOP to resist Trump's influence as it defines itself in the Biden era.


Trump's "refusal to accept the result of the election not only cost Republicans the Senate but led to mob violence," the former speaker writes in his forthcoming book, "On the House: A Washington Memoir," 

 

https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/07/politics/john-boehner-donald-trump-insurrection/index.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...