SoCal Deek Posted March 25, 2022 Posted March 25, 2022 On 3/24/2022 at 9:41 PM, BillStime said: Seriously, wtf? Expand So let me get this straight. If you honestly thought the election results weren’t accurate, it’s your opinion that the ‘losing’ candidate should just say ‘oh well’ and walk away? That’s what you honestly think? Honestly?
BillStime Posted March 25, 2022 Posted March 25, 2022 On 3/25/2022 at 3:03 AM, SoCal Deek said: So let me get this straight. If you honestly thought the election results weren’t accurate, it’s your opinion that the ‘losing’ candidate should just say ‘oh well’ and walk away? That’s what you honestly think? Honestly? Expand Please stop. There are serious ethical issues with the spouse of a SC judge running around like a Q nut job and using her stature to reach out to WH staff they Gin Gin did. Why was Trump questioning the integrity of the election MONTHS before the actual election? Why was he planting doubt in the gullible and insecure MAGAs? All part of the plan . Love, The Big Lie
BillsFanNC Posted March 25, 2022 Posted March 25, 2022 On 3/25/2022 at 3:03 AM, SoCal Deek said: So let me get this straight. If you honestly thought the election results weren’t accurate, it’s your opinion that the ‘losing’ candidate should just say ‘oh well’ and walk away? That’s what you honestly think? Honestly? Expand Democrats in congress would never protest the results of an election! They are only for "preserving democracy" Note Joe Bidens speech cadence in this clip vs. today. Striking. 1
SoCal Deek Posted March 25, 2022 Posted March 25, 2022 On 3/25/2022 at 12:41 PM, DRsGhost said: Democrats in congress would never protest the results of an election! They are only for "preserving democracy" Note Joe Bidens speech cadence in this clip vs. today. Striking. Expand You’re right of course. The civilized way to protest the election is to set up a phony story so you can spy on the White House and then use it as a pretense to remove your opponent from office via impeachment. Silly me! 1
Wacka Posted March 25, 2022 Posted March 25, 2022 So dems want to subjugate women. They must be under their husband's thumb!
BillStime Posted March 25, 2022 Posted March 25, 2022 On 3/25/2022 at 7:23 PM, Wacka said: So dems want to subjugate women. They must be under their husband's thumb! Expand Yea ok bro
daz28 Posted March 25, 2022 Posted March 25, 2022 On 3/25/2022 at 3:03 AM, SoCal Deek said: So let me get this straight. If you honestly thought the election results weren’t accurate, it’s your opinion that the ‘losing’ candidate should just say ‘oh well’ and walk away? That’s what you honestly think? Honestly? Expand I think you'd maybe want to substantiate your claims before you start taking those measures? It does matter what you "thought". 1
SoCal Deek Posted March 25, 2022 Posted March 25, 2022 On 3/25/2022 at 11:14 PM, daz28 said: I think you'd maybe want to substantiate your claims before you start taking those measures? It does matter what you "thought". Expand Ugh! And how do you substantiate your claims without due process? And…not that you care…but the initial claim (which still stands today) is that election laws were illegally changed without legislative approval. 1
daz28 Posted March 25, 2022 Posted March 25, 2022 On 3/25/2022 at 11:17 PM, SoCal Deek said: Ugh! And how do you substantiate your claims without due process? And…not that you care…but the initial claim (which still stands today) is that election laws were illegally changed without legislative approval. Expand So litigate it for 4 years, and damn the results, even if it appears that no one "rigged" the election? If "rigging" the election is counting legitimate votes, even if they weren't to the letter of the law, then gimme more of it. It would be the equivalent of voiding a super bowl for missing a guys toe stepping out of bound, but there was no one within 50 yards of him to stop the score. 1
BuffaninSarasota Posted March 25, 2022 Posted March 25, 2022 On 3/25/2022 at 11:23 PM, daz28 said: So litigate it for 4 years, and damn the results, even if it appears that no one "rigged" the election? If "rigging" the election is counting legitimate votes, even if they weren't to the letter of the law, then gimme more of it. It would be the equivalent of voiding a super bowl for missing a guys toe stepping out of bound, but there was no one within 50 yards of him to stop the score. Expand Rigging = counting legitimate votes ? That’s some pretzel logic ….
daz28 Posted March 25, 2022 Posted March 25, 2022 On 3/25/2022 at 11:28 PM, BuffaninSarasota said: Rigging = counting legitimate votes ? That’s some pretzel logic …. Expand He lost period. Stop searching for the loophole. Trump's spent his life doing that, and it's not always honorable. 1
BuffaninSarasota Posted March 26, 2022 Posted March 26, 2022 On 3/25/2022 at 11:37 PM, daz28 said: He lost period. Stop searching for the loophole. Trump's spent his life doing that, and it's not always honorable. Expand I’m not trying to defend Trump - at all. I’m making an observation about your convoluted statement.
BillStime Posted March 26, 2022 Posted March 26, 2022 On 3/25/2022 at 11:28 PM, BuffaninSarasota said: Rigging = counting legitimate votes ? That’s some pretzel logic …. Expand …. lmao
Recommended Posts