Doc Posted October 31, 2021 Posted October 31, 2021 2 minutes ago, BillStime said: You're desperate, @Doc. Where is the proof on Epps? Substantiate it! lol Cling to Bonnie like he provides credibility. I don't need Epps for anything other than to show you how you made a hypocrite of yourself. "What law was broken"? But OK, there's no proof on Epps. There's also no proof on Trump. Who's fantasy does that hurt more?
BillStime Posted October 31, 2021 Posted October 31, 2021 1 minute ago, Doc said: I don't need Epps for anything other than to show you how you made a hypocrite of yourself. "What law was broken"? But OK, there's no proof on Epps. There's also no proof on Trump. Who's fantasy does that hurt more? Oh - you don’t think I knew where you were going with this all along? lmao Who had the most to gain? Epps or Trump?
Doc Posted October 31, 2021 Posted October 31, 2021 7 minutes ago, BillStime said: Oh - you don’t think I knew where you were going with this all along? lmao Who had the most to gain? Epps or Trump? No, you didn't. Otherwise you wouldn't have said it. Trump theoretically had more to gain obviously. The reality is he gained nothing. So why was Epps actually saying it on video, like he knew nothing would (and guess what? It didn't) happen to him? But that still has nothing to do with proving Trump told them to enter the Capitol. What are you going to do when there is no evidence found? Yup, still believe it.
BillStime Posted October 31, 2021 Posted October 31, 2021 2 minutes ago, Doc said: No, you didn't. Otherwise you wouldn't have said it. Trump theoretically had more to gain obviously. The reality is he gained nothing. So why was Epps actually saying it on video, like he knew nothing would (and guess what? It didn't) happen to him? But that still has nothing to do with proving Trump told them to enter the Capitol. What are you going to do when there is no evidence found? Yup, still believe it. Lol - wow - grasp harder - keep convincing yourself that all of this makes sense. Now way more importantly - where do you practice medicine? You do know we can figure this out right? Lol
Doc Posted October 31, 2021 Posted October 31, 2021 9 minutes ago, BillStime said: Lol - wow - grasp harder - keep convincing yourself that all of this makes sense. Now way more importantly - where do you practice medicine? You do know we can figure this out right? Lol No, I've seen your posts. You still believe all the bull#### they fed you, even though it's all been disproven. You'll do the same here. No matter, Joey's been such a disaster that everyone except for lock-step Dems like you realize they made a huge mistake voting for him. When the commission fails to find anything, it will only get worse. And then when the socialists succeed in taking the Dem party far left... Go knock yourself out then and figure it out. Anything that keeps you from posting...
All_Pro_Bills Posted October 31, 2021 Posted October 31, 2021 (edited) 6 hours ago, Doc said: No, you didn't. Otherwise you wouldn't have said it. Trump theoretically had more to gain obviously. The reality is he gained nothing. So why was Epps actually saying it on video, like he knew nothing would (and guess what? It didn't) happen to him? But that still has nothing to do with proving Trump told them to enter the Capitol. What are you going to do when there is no evidence found? Yup, still believe it. With evidence of incitement and the fact Epps hasn't been arrested, althoughh is actions, name, and address are clearly known while 100's of other's are picked up and charged with lesser offenses, the logical conclusion is he's an agency asset put at the scene to create an incident. Although the FBI or other Federal agencies or departments will probably never admit to it. And the committee will likely steer clear of digging into the details surrounding his actions. The question is how many other agents or assets were active during 1/6. What's not stated enough is the likelihood that Federal law enforcement and other Federal agencies were running an active intelligence and misinformation operation against a sitting President. To create an incident that would lead to him being accused of mounting a violent assault on the US Capitol to stop or change the Electoral Vote. Federal employees under the executive branch of government, reporting to the President working to set him up. So who are the real traitors and insurrectionists here? That's why I have such a high level of contempt and distain for the FBI and intelligence agencies. If they can do it to him, the President, then there are no limits or controls on what they can do to you and me. That's the core issue at play here. Everything else is a sideshow drama. Rogue agencies operating independently of the elected government without regard for the law or the Constitution. That's the big threat to democracy and the theme the dummies supporting the committee are missing. Edited October 31, 2021 by All_Pro_Bills 1
yall Posted October 31, 2021 Posted October 31, 2021 14 hours ago, Buffalo Timmy said: Dear lord you are an absolute moron, no one said they did not enter the capitol. The fact that your whole statement is predicated on a complete lie is all I need to know. Seriously find one person in this 172 page thread or stated that people did not enter the capitol. That wasn't what I was referring to with the "no they didn't line". It was more of a reference to the fact that people are being wilfully ignorant about their intentions, actions and motivation. Also you're probably an idiot. Haven't seen Tom here in a while so likely you need to be reminded.
BillStime Posted October 31, 2021 Posted October 31, 2021 8 hours ago, Doc said: No, I've seen your posts. You still believe all the bull#### they fed you, even though it's all been disproven. You'll do the same here. No matter, Joey's been such a disaster that everyone except for lock-step Dems like you realize they made a huge mistake voting for him. When the commission fails to find anything, it will only get worse. And then when the socialists succeed in taking the Dem party far left... Go knock yourself out then and figure it out. Anything that keeps you from posting... Wow - lol - deflect much? lol
Doc Posted October 31, 2021 Posted October 31, 2021 16 minutes ago, BillStime said: Wow - lol - deflect much? lol I guess, because obviously in your world "deflect" is actually "tell you the truth and watch it be proven true later when investigations find nothing." This will be no different.
BillStime Posted October 31, 2021 Posted October 31, 2021 4 minutes ago, Doc said: I guess, because obviously in your world "deflect" is actually "tell you the truth and watch it be proven true later when investigations find nothing." This will be no different. Why are you so desperate?
Doc Posted October 31, 2021 Posted October 31, 2021 10 minutes ago, BillStime said: Why are you so desperate? Another of your words for "tell you the truth and watch it be proven true later when investigations find nothing."
Orlando Buffalo Posted October 31, 2021 Posted October 31, 2021 54 minutes ago, yall said: That wasn't what I was referring to with the "no they didn't line". It was more of a reference to the fact that people are being wilfully ignorant about their intentions, actions and motivation. Also you're probably an idiot. Haven't seen Tom here in a while so likely you need to be reminded. Are you seriously trying to say people were saying the intent of the march was not to stop the certification of the election? Once again show me one person. Actions would be the entering of the capitol, which you just agreed no one disputes. And we all agree the motivation was to stop a Biden presidency- so once again what did people dispute? Maybe go find a comment that backs up something along the lines of what you are saying because right now you are not making any sense.
BillStime Posted October 31, 2021 Posted October 31, 2021 6 minutes ago, Doc said: Another of your words for "tell you the truth and watch it be proven true later when investigations find nothing." For example? lol You are so desperate you are putting all your chips on Ray Epps!!! And of course you wouldn’t dare acknowledge the fact that people at the rally were encouraging people to storm the capitol while your cult leader was speaking. loser
Doc Posted October 31, 2021 Posted October 31, 2021 1 minute ago, BillStime said: For example? lol You are so desperate you are putting all your chips on Ray Epps!!! And of course you wouldn’t dare acknowledge the fact that people at the rally were encouraging people to storm the capitol while your cult leader was speaking. loser LOL! No. He was a useful idiot for the government whose inability to implicate Trump should tell you everything you need to know (no wait, they're waiting for the commission to bring out this smoking gun 🤣). I just used him as a way to make you look like a fool with the "what law was broken."
yall Posted October 31, 2021 Posted October 31, 2021 12 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said: Are you seriously trying to say people were saying the intent of the march was not to stop the certification of the election? Once again show me one person. Actions would be the entering of the capitol, which you just agreed no one disputes. And we all agree the motivation was to stop a Biden presidency- so once again what did people dispute? Maybe go find a comment that backs up something along the lines of what you are saying because right now you are not making any sense. It may not have been in this thread, but there were many initial reactions that claimed it was really antifa posing some false flag operation and not really Trump heads. So yes my original point clearly does make sense. And you're still an idiot.
Orlando Buffalo Posted October 31, 2021 Posted October 31, 2021 2 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said: With evidence of incitement and the fact Epps hasn't been arrested, althoughh is actions, name, and address are clearly known while 100's of other's are picked up and charged with lesser offenses, the logical conclusion is he's an agency asset put at the scene to create an incident. Although the FBI or other Federal agencies or departments will probably never admit to it. And the committee will likely steer clear of digging into the details surrounding his actions. The question is how many other agents or assets were active during 1/6. What's not stated enough is the likelihood that Federal law enforcement and other Federal agencies were running an active intelligence and misinformation operation against a sitting President. To create an incident that would lead to him being accused of mounting a violent assault on the US Capitol to stop or change the Electoral Vote. Federal employees under the executive branch of government, reporting to the President working to set him up. So who are the real traitors and insurrectionists here? That's why I have such a high level of contempt and distain for the FBI and intelligence agencies. If they can do it to him, the President, then there are no limits or controls on what they can do to you and me. That's the core issue at play here. Everything else is a sideshow drama. Rogue agencies operating independently of the elected government without regard for the law or the Constitution. That's the big threat to democracy and the theme the dummies supporting the committee are missing. If you had told me a similar statement as "the FBI set this up" 5 years ago I would have rejected it put of hand immediately and not even thought about it. The FBI though has outed itself as a partisan organization, and since January 6th was clearly well known before the date the lack of prep work is at a minimum pathetic.
yall Posted October 31, 2021 Posted October 31, 2021 2 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said: If you had told me a similar statement as "the FBI set this up" 5 years ago I would have rejected it put of hand immediately and not even thought about it. The FBI though has outed itself as a partisan organization, and since January 6th was clearly well known before the date the lack of prep work is at a minimum pathetic. So is your assertion that the FBI knowingly allowed it to happen?
Orlando Buffalo Posted October 31, 2021 Posted October 31, 2021 1 minute ago, yall said: It may not have been in this thread, but there were many initial reactions that claimed it was really antifa posing some false flag operation and not really Trump heads. So yes my original point clearly does make sense. And you're still an idiot. So I am the idiot when you had to walk back an initial statement, which you could not defend, to somewhere you saw someone say something that resembles what you need to believe. BTW do you believe that everyone who entered the capitol is a Trump supporter?
BillStime Posted October 31, 2021 Posted October 31, 2021 45 minutes ago, Doc said: LOL! No. He was a useful idiot for the government whose inability to implicate Trump should tell you everything you need to know (no wait, they're waiting for the commission to bring out this smoking gun 🤣). I just used him as a way to make you look like a fool with the "what law was broken." Do you still believe in Santa?
Recommended Posts