Buffalo_Stampede Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Southern_Bills said: Absolutely astonishing that people are on here questioning Beane's ability as a GM. Everyone makes mistakes. He built a roster that got us to the AFCCG, calm down. Of course unless all that was sarcasm then I retract. Nobody's questioning Beane. Don't make it about that. He messed up with Trent Murphy. Those types of mistakes can cost you a Super Bowl. Edited February 13, 2021 by Buffalo_Stampede 1
Success Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 4 minutes ago, Southern_Bills said: Absolutely astonishing that people are on here questioning Beane's ability as a GM. Everyone makes mistakes. He built a roster that got us to the AFCCG, calm down. Of course unless all that was sarcasm then I retract. Beane has earned 100% trust, imo. After 2 decades, he fairly quickly turned this team into a SB contender - AND he picked the right Josh. Yet we will still get tons of posts on draft day saying he should have picked this guy or that guy, and blew it...
Buffalo_Stampede Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 2 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said: We are in agreement that Beane has been very inefficient with cap space.........that's why they are up against it with a QB still on his rookie deal. But you are discounting that they still thought that Murphy was perhaps going to return to his peak pass rusher level. That's why they signed him and he had a huge game with 3 sacks in the playoffs against Houston 9 months earlier so they might have thought he was finally getting back to being productive. Murphy as that near double-digit sacks guy that they paid him to be was NOT replaced. That's why we are having this Watt discussion. They replaced him cap wise with Mario Addison. He was replaced by Addison. 1
Southern_Bills Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 6 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said: Nobody's questioning Beane. Don't make it about that. He messed up with Trent Murphy. Those types of mistakes can cost you a Super Bowl. The same Trent Murphy who was instrumental in the gameplan to shut Lamar Jackson down in the playoffs 🤔 That makes sense my bad
GunnerBill Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 29 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said: Dumping Logan Thomas and then watching him become a top receiving TE(3rd in receptions 7th in yards)? That wasn't a bad decision IMO. Not like they dumped him straight away. He was on the roster the first two years here and got on the field ocassionally and was bang average. He then went to Detroit and didn't stick too. You don't just keep dedicating a roster spot to a QB to TE conversion project for four years hoping the light finally comes on when he is 29 year old. I am pleased for Logan but I attach no wrong doing to the Bills in that scenario. 2 2
Buffalo_Stampede Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 Just now, Southern_Bills said: The same Trent Murphy who was instrumental in the gameplan to shut Lamar Jackson down in the playoffs 🤔 That makes sense my bad So you're telling me that we don't beat Baltimore without Trent Murphy? He had a good game the year before in the playoffs, we lost. Should we re-sign Murphy then?
JGMcD2 Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 9 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said: Nobody's questioning Beane. Don't make it about that. He messed up with Trent Murphy. Those types of mistakes can cost you a Super Bowl. Wasn’t Trent Murphy fairly instrumental when it came to containing Lamar Jackson against Baltimore in the playoffs, which got us to the AFC Championship game? So not having Murphy could’ve have also cost us a chance at the Super Bowl? 1
Southern_Bills Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 Just now, Buffalo_Stampede said: So you're telling me that we don't beat Baltimore without Trent Murphy? He had a good game the year before in the playoffs, we lost. Should we re-sign Murphy then? It's hard to say win/lose off one guys performance. Though I will say we wouldn't have been as successful against the read option without him. Also Beane had no clue the salary cap would bottom out. I think the criticism is out of line.
4merper4mer Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 17 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: Congrats. He’s calling Bills fans criminals. 1
Hapless Bills Fan Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 17 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: "Attempts at bribes" 😆
Shaw66 Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 For me, the Watt decision is simple. A year ago, the Bills needed a top-10 receiver. The only top-10 players who are available have a back story. Diggs had a back story, so he was available. Is there a risk taking a guy with a back story? Sure, but every decision carries risk. This year, the Bills need a top-10 defensive lineman. Watt is clearly one of those. He has a back story, so he is available. Is there a risk? Sure. Would you like to see JJ Watt rushing the passer for the Bills? Sure. If Beane and Watt can make a deal, it's a no brainer. 2 2
JGMcD2 Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Southern_Bills said: It's hard to say win/lose off one guys performance. Though I will say we wouldn't have been as successful against the read option without him. Also Beane had no clue the salary cap would bottom out. I think the criticism is out of line. I personally would’ve cut him. I was underwhelmed by him for 2 years, but I don’t think it was this egregious error. It’s pretty simple, they felt having him on the roster at $7.5M was better than saving $7.5M and the next guy up after him. Was he a difference maker for us? No. But for all the whining about our bad defensive line play, you’d think people would be ok with keeping a decent defensive lineman who had shown flashes the previous year to see if he can make a difference or not in a season where going into it you’re making a run at the division and potentially the conference. The move isn’t setting the franchise back decades. Edited February 13, 2021 by JGMcD2 1
Buffalo_Stampede Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 1 minute ago, Southern_Bills said: It's hard to say win/lose off one guys performance. Though I will say we wouldn't have been as successful against the read option without him. Also Beane had no clue the salary cap would bottom out. I think the criticism is out of line. Yes he did know. There were no fans. We knew the cap would be low. There is no defending keeping Murphy. No one is attacking Beane. No need to defend him. 5 minutes ago, Shaw66 said: For me, the Watt decision is simple. A year ago, the Bills needed a top-10 receiver. The only top-10 players who are available have a back story. Diggs had a back story, so he was available. Is there a risk taking a guy with a back story? Sure, but every decision carries risk. This year, the Bills need a top-10 defensive lineman. Watt is clearly one of those. He has a back story, so he is available. Is there a risk? Sure. Would you like to see JJ Watt rushing the passer for the Bills? Sure. If Beane and Watt can make a deal, it's a no brainer. But do you wait for Von Miller? Also others will become available.
FireChans Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 20 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said: We are in agreement that Beane has been very inefficient with cap space.........that's why they are up against it with a QB still on his rookie deal. But you are discounting that they still thought that Murphy was perhaps going to return to his peak pass rusher level. That's why they signed him and he had a huge game with 3 sacks in the playoffs against Houston 9 months earlier so they might have thought he was finally getting back to being productive. Murphy as that near double-digit sacks guy that they paid him to be was NOT replaced. That's why we are having this Watt discussion. Hmm, not sure I agree. I look at the cap, and the second Josh hits real money, we pretty much have no dead weight under contract. 2 1
GunnerBill Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 4 minutes ago, Shaw66 said: For me, the Watt decision is simple. A year ago, the Bills needed a top-10 receiver. The only top-10 players who are available have a back story. Diggs had a back story, so he was available. Is there a risk taking a guy with a back story? Sure, but every decision carries risk. This year, the Bills need a top-10 defensive lineman. Watt is clearly one of those. He has a back story, so he is available. Is there a risk? Sure. Would you like to see JJ Watt rushing the passer for the Bills? Sure. If Beane and Watt can make a deal, it's a no brainer. My concern is he has player his whole career in a very different scheme. I'm not sure at this stage in his career if you can suddenly make him an outside edge rusher in a 4-3 and expect him to be that guy that puts us over the top. That said, I love JJ Watt and for the right contract I'd do it. Is he willing to take below what he could get on the open market to chase a ring? If he is, then come on down. 1 1
ngbills Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 Watt, Hughes, AJ,Johnson, Rookies vs Hughes, Addison, Jefferson, AJ, Johnson easy choice. If you can swap watt for Addison and Jefferson.
Rc2catch Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 It’s funny seeing people using Logan Thomas as a niche to dig at management, yet hating on Knox for not playing fantastic after two seasons. How long has Thomas been around now? Pretty sure he seen more targets this season alone than him or Knox have seen in their careers almost 2
NewEra Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 1 minute ago, GunnerBill said: My concern is he has player his whole career in a very different scheme. I'm not sure at this stage in his career if you can suddenly make him an outside edge rusher in a 4-3 and expect him to be that guy that puts us over the top. That said, I love JJ Watt and for the right contract I'd do it. Is he willing to take below what he could get on the open market to chase a ring? If he is, then come on down. That’s the one thing that scares me about Watt. What position does he play. Seems like 3 tech would be his best position in a 4-3. I saw that you preferred Von Miller to watt, with that I ask, what position does he play? DE is the obvious answer, but it’s also a position that he’s never played before, as Denver has been 3-4 since he’s been in the league iirc. the only thing I know, is we should replace a Addison with a top free agent pass rusher or our 1st rd pick. 1
Rc2catch Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 2 minutes ago, NewEra said: That’s the one thing that scares me about Watt. What position does he play. Seems like 3 tech would be his best position in a 4-3. I saw that you preferred Von Miller to watt, with that I ask, what position does he play? DE is the obvious answer, but it’s also a position that he’s never played before, as Denver has been 3-4 since he’s been in the league iirc. the only thing I know, is we should replace a Addison with a top free agent pass rusher or our 1st rd pick. I think Watt would be what they wanted Quentin Jefferson to be. Versatile enough to swap between end and DT depending on down and package 3 1
FireChans Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 1 minute ago, Rc2catch said: It’s funny seeing people using Logan Thomas as a niche to dig at management, yet hating on Knox for not playing fantastic after two seasons. How long has Thomas been around now? Pretty sure he seen more targets this season alone than him or Knox have seen in their careers almost Compare how long they've played TE
Recommended Posts