Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Starters to the Left

 

RT Williams Peters Gandy McFarland

RG Villarial Smith Geisinger

C Teague Preston Tucker

LG Anderson Tucker Geisinger

LT Price?? Peters Gandy Teague

 

 

I am trying to work this out, this is an F****** Mess. Price is more than likely not coming back, which leaves us with one, maybe two true tackles, and some filler pieces. McNally has some work to do, but I am confident he will figure it out.

Posted
give me what you think is our starting o-line as of right nowr

317376[/snapback]

Based on the current roster:

 

LT Mike Gandy

LG Bennie Anderson

C Trey Teague

RG Chris Villarrial

RT Mike Williams

 

Bench:

OT/OG Dylan McFarland

OC Duke Preston

OG/OC Ross Tucker

 

Practice Squad:

OT/OG Justin Geisinger

UDFA to be named later

Posted

I did not attend any Bills games last year, but I did see each and every game on Sunday Ticket. The only position I am really worried about is left tackle. I think if our line is Gandy, Anderson, Teague, Villariell and Williams I am really happy because it means Ross Tucker is on the bench it means he is depth and I thought he was quite solid last year. Essentially I think if Teague is our left tackle ross tucker is our centre or if Teague remains at centre Gandy is our left tackle. I do not know enough to comment on the possibility of Jason Peters at left tackle.

Posted
Peters-Anderson-Teague-Villarial-Williams

 

atleast going into mini-camp that's projected.

317383[/snapback]

 

You are correct Sir!

 

And I think that will be the Line-Up on Opening Day (baring injury) as well... :(

Posted
Agreed.

 

Tackles:Gandy,Williams, McFarland, Peters

Guards: Villarrial, Anderson, Tucker, Smith

Centers:Teague, Tucker, Preston

317581[/snapback]

 

I generally aggree but this is going to be way open to competition as UDFAs are signed, depending upon who comes available as cap casualties. and from exisiting roster competition.

 

My guess is that either Peters is going to be such a phenomenal athlete they will be unable to take the ball out of his hands by making him a tackle and he makes this roster as a TE or he is not athlete he should be and will fail to make the roster.

 

I expect that we will keep 10 OL players. This will be the 5 dtarters, 2 active back-ups each week and 1 in-sctive back-up. In addition to this there should be two developmental players who will either be on the PS or on the active roster.

 

If you shift Peters on the above list to TE, this gives one more OL spot for a UDFA, new signing (a cap casualty like Shelton) or even a trade to make the team.

Posted
Based on the current roster:

 

LT Mike Gandy

LG Bennie Anderson

C Trey Teague

RG Chris Villarrial

RT Mike Williams

 

Bench:

OT/OG Dylan McFarland

OC Duke Preston

OG/OC Ross Tucker

 

Practice Squad:

OT/OG Justin Geisinger

UDFA to be named later

317576[/snapback]

 

I see it this way

 

LT - Teague

LG - Anderson

C - Tucker

RG - Villarrial

RT - Williams

 

Bench:

Peters (T), Gandy (T/G), McFarland (T/G), Preston (C/G)

 

Practice:

T/G Geisinger

 

There's no way they start Gandy or Peters at Tackle.

Posted

Let the rookies play:

 

LT Teague

LG Geisinger

C Duke

RG Villarrial

RT Williams

 

Look, if you have a guy nicknamed "Duke" on your roster, you have to start him, it is a League rule, look it up.

Posted
Starters to the Left

 

RT  Williams      Peters          Gandy        McFarland

RG  Villarial        Smith          Geisinger

C    Teague        Preston        Tucker

LG  Anderson    Tucker        Geisinger

LT  Price??        Peters          Gandy          Teague

I am trying to work this out, this is an F****** Mess. Price is more than likely not coming back, which leaves us with one, maybe two true tackles, and some filler pieces. McNally has some work to do, but I am confident he will figure it out.

317387[/snapback]

 

I am sure teams will be releasing players from now till camp...(Remember

the guy from Arizona who was released last year and the Jets signed him

and he had a good season for them). I am sure TD will be looking for those

kind of players and also any other trade possibilities. The OL is not going

to be the same going into training camp.

Posted

I think the Bills will look at all options at LT before moving TT out there. If Gandy, McFarland or a 6/1 cut can get the job done, why move TT. He seemed to be more comfortable at OC in 2004 and I'd like to see him stay there in 2005.

Posted
I see it this way

 

LT - Teague

LG - Anderson

C - Tucker

RG - Villarrial

RT - Williams

 

Bench:

Peters (T), Gandy (T/G), McFarland (T/G), Preston (C/G)

 

Practice:

T/G Geisinger

 

There's no way they start Gandy or Peters at Tackle.

317628[/snapback]

 

 

Bullseye

Posted
I see it this way

 

LT - Teague

LG - Anderson

C - Tucker

RG - Villarrial

RT - Williams

 

Bench:

Peters (T), Gandy (T/G), McFarland (T/G), Preston (C/G)

 

Practice:

T/G Geisinger

 

There's no way they start Gandy or Peters at Tackle.

317628[/snapback]

If Geisinger is as good as they say, no way does the "phenom" ;) Peters beat him out for a spot on the 53 man roster.

 

Other than that, I can see the OL playing out as you have stated.

Posted

I am trying to work this out, this is an F****** Mess. Price is more than likely not coming back, which leaves us with one, maybe two true tackles, and some filler pieces. McNally has some work to do, but I am confident he will figure it out.

317387[/snapback]

 

 

Fortunately, the Bills pay staff to figure the mess out so you do not have to.

Posted

LT - Trey Teague

LG - Bennie Anderson

C - Raymond Preston

RG - Chris Villarial

RT - Mike Williams

 

But I think that someone is going to get cut between now and the beginning of the season that we'll sign as our LT.

Posted

LT:peters (he wasnt good enouph to even be a backup last season. how can he start!!???

 

LG: L. Smith (he did ok last season)

C: Teague

RG: Vilarrial

RT: Williams

 

 

i can see williams switching to LT.

Posted

Peters may not be starting, but based on what he showed us last year on ST, I find it hard to believe that he wouldn't make the 53-man roster (as some have in this thread have suggested as a possibility). Unlike last year, he'd be snapped up by another team pretty quick.

Posted
Peters may not be starting, but based on what he showed us last year on ST, I find it hard to believe that he wouldn't make the 53-man roster (as some have in this thread have suggested as a possibility). Unlike last year, he'd be snapped up by another team pretty quick.

317893[/snapback]

You're on the "phenom" bandwagon? It's going to take a heck of a lot more than one blocked punt for me to believe he is a lock for the 53 man roster. Two months ago, people were stating that Bannan and Peters were going to be solid OL players. Well...so much for Bannan. He got moved back to DT and one step away from being camp fodder as of yesterday.

 

Let's see how things play out with the other OL convert.

×
×
  • Create New...