Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
17 hours ago, ChiGoose said:

Anyone supporting the dissolution of the United States is a traitor and should be treated as such.

 

We may have our disagreements but the moment you start seeing your fellow Americans as the enemy is the moment you’ve betrayed the values this country was founded upon. 

Couldn’t agree more. It far better to stay married in an abusive relationship where one side calls the other side, deplorable, Neanderthal terrorists. 😉

Posted
22 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Couldn’t agree more. It far better to stay married in an abusive relationship where one side calls the other side, deplorable, Neanderthal terrorists. 😉

 

In an actual divorce, it's possible to go separate ways. With MAGA vs the rest of us, that doesn't seem very possible, mostly due to geography. Maybe Marge should lead MAGA in a takeover of Canada or Mexico.

 

It's a treasonous sentiment, regardless.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Gene Frenkle said:

 

In an actual divorce, it's possible to go separate ways. With MAGA vs the rest of us, that doesn't seem very possible, mostly due to geography. Maybe Marge should lead MAGA in a takeover of Canada or Mexico.

 

It's a treasonous sentiment, regardless.

She’s a clown. But pointing to her as having coming out of nowhere is naive. She’s a product of my earlier post. You can’t keep calling people worthless trash without them eventually taking offense. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

She’s a clown. But pointing to her as having coming out of nowhere is naive. She’s a product of my earlier post. You can’t keep calling people worthless trash without them eventually taking offense. 

 

She's powerful right now, and dangerous.

 

I want to preface this by saying that I'm not calling her Hitler:

 

Hitler was considered a clown as well, until he wasn't. Just because she's a clown, doesn't mean she should just be ignored and left to put on her clown show unchecked.

 

This latest GOP Nazi vibe is getting a bit unnerving.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Gene Frenkle said:

 

She's powerful right now, and dangerous.

 

I want to preface this by saying that I'm not calling her Hitler:

 

Hitler was considered a clown as well, until he wasn't. Just because she's a clown, doesn't mean she should just be ignored and left to put on her clown show unchecked.

 

This latest GOP Nazi vibe is getting a bit unnerving.

She’s a clown. Period. Relax Gene. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Gene Frenkle said:

 

Right, just ignore it. Will do, thanks. Sounds like a good plan.

The democrats have their own lunatic fringe in the House. Again, most folks just ignore them.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said:

Couldn’t agree more. It far better to stay married in an abusive relationship where one side calls the other side, deplorable, Neanderthal terrorists. 😉


That’s an absolutely ridiculous comparison and you know it. 

Posted
2 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

in other words, they can't pick a team.  Not sure they're gonna find one they agree with on the state level.  If it doesn't pander to them at the expense of everyone else, it's no good.


They’ll still vote republican. They just won’t enjoy it. 
 

Their options are either A. All the leftist policies they hate at the speed of light or B. All the leftist policies they hate at the speed of sound. 
 

The “third parties” are all bad. Green Party full of nuts, lolbertarian party’s big draw is teenagers and most of them can’t vote. 

 

1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:


That’s an absolutely ridiculous comparison and you know it. 


Because the Hitler comparison is so apt. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Sure Goose. You must be right. You’re always right….in your mind. 


Divorces in abusive relationships don’t usually end in an actual war. What is being proposed here would. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


Divorces in abusive relationships don’t usually end in an actual war. What is being proposed here would. 

You’re a reasonable guy Goose. Did you REALLY think that elected officials could call American citizens every name in the book, and it NOT end up with some people getting REALLY pissed off? Really? 

Posted
4 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

You’re a reasonable guy Goose. Did you REALLY think that elected officials could call American citizens every name in the book, and it NOT end up with some people getting REALLY pissed off? Really? 


Sure, people get pissed off at the dumbest things. 
 

Doesn’t mean that a second civil war is a good idea. 
 

Maybe we should focus our energies on reforms that would turn down the heat instead of accelerating it. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted

Does anyone believe the stockpile of civilian weaponry could compete with F16's and state of the art drones etc?  It'd be over faster than you can say Iraq.  But people would needlessly die.  Ridiculous to even consider.  Sure there are people that would be traitors within the military but punish a few appropriately and it would stop quickly.  c'mon guys.

Posted
12 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


Sure, people get pissed off at the dumbest things. 
 

Doesn’t mean that a second civil war is a good idea. 
 

Maybe we should focus our energies on reforms that would turn down the heat instead of accelerating it. 

Okay…so ‘you’ have the bulky pulpit now. How about if Biden knocks it off? Do we have a deal? 

Posted
3 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Okay…so ‘you’ have the bulky pulpit now. How about if Biden knocks it off? Do we have a deal? 


Sorry to break it to you, but the President of the United States doesn’t take my calls. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Does anyone believe the stockpile of civilian weaponry could compete with F16's and state of the art drones etc?  It'd be over faster than you can say Iraq.  But people would needlessly die.  Ridiculous to even consider.  Sure there are people that would be traitors within the military but punish a few appropriately and it would stop quickly.  c'mon guys.


Again, are these the same F16s and state of the art drones that couldn’t beat a bunch of opium farmers armed with thirty year old AKs?

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, LeviF said:


Again, are these the same F16s and state of the art drones that couldn’t beat a bunch of opium farmers armed with thirty year old AKs?

they did a bang up job in Iraq and the terrain would be very familiar.  I'd wager the stockpile locations of weapons are already known.  That and Bill Gates has already altered the DNA of every American...just needs to selectively throw the switch.  And we have awesome space lasers.

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Haha (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...