Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

There's an important distinction here:

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/twitter-permanently-suspends-marjorie-taylor-greenes-personal-account-rcna10615

 

See that? Marjorie Taylor Greene's PERSONAL account is suspended.

She still has access to her official account as a member of the House.

 

So did Trump when his personal account - the one he used incessantly to post his inflammatory bs - was suspended.

 

Obama never had a "personal" account as President. It was the White House account.

 

If Marjorie wants to post her conspiracy nonsense on her official account, I guess we'll have to see how twitter responds.

  • Dislike 1
Posted
1 hour ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Falsely put.

 

NO bakery has refused to sell cakes/baked goods to gays.

 

Several have asked not to fill a WEDDING cake order due to religious beliefs, but of course they were condemned for this.

 

Except in the courts.

Seems to me that is refusal and in my books discriminatory 100%. Don't care if it is a wedding or birthday cake, of a frigging fruitcake.

My religion believes in blood transfusions so should I not serve birthday cake to those who do not.

My religion dies not believe in birthcontrol pills or abortion, so should I not serve those who accept it.

I believe in God do should I not sell cakes to atheists.

 

A rose by any color is still a rose.

Posted
5 hours ago, Tiberius said:

What, if you go to car dealership and abuse the car on a test drive, then (you’d say) too bad for the business this guy should get to do it all the time? 😒

Not so fast. ‘Abuse’ a website by expressing an opinion…when the entire business plan of the website is built upon people expressing their opinions? 

Posted

The liberals here are the biggest hypocrites and cry babies. Ban or shutdown anything I don’t agree with. You twist yourselves into pretzels to make it work for you.

 

For once, put your political agenda aside and use common sense!

It’s not that difficult. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Westside said:

The liberals here are the biggest hypocrites and cry babies. Ban or shutdown anything I don’t agree with. You twist yourselves into pretzels to make it work for you.

 

For once, put your political agenda aside and use common sense!

It’s not that difficult. 

They used to be the party of working people and free speech…but that ship sailed long ago. It’s honestly fascinating to see where they’ve ended up. 

  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said:

Not so fast. ‘Abuse’ a website by expressing an opinion…when the entire business plan of the website is built upon people expressing their opinions? 

For me the issue is relatively straightforward.  Its got nothing to do with the rights of private entities to act with impunity.  The law is clear there are limitations to private freedoms and their ability to disregard customer agreements, contracts, and regulations.  So all these hypothetical comparisons are just that, hypothetical.  It distracts from the real issue.  Which is demanding the truth and making fact based decisions.  Whatever your political, social, or economic views everybody should be demanding that decisions be made on sound facts.  Not on politics.  But when you mix science with politics most times you get politics. 

 

And the example I used is Dr. Robert Malone.  The guy that invented mRNA technology and holds all kinds of patents against the technology.  He gets banned from Twitter for spreading "mis-information" based on an almost 3 hour Joe Rogan podcast.  He raises all kinds of issues and provides what sounds like clear and rational science.  Whether you like Joe Rogan or not doesn't matter.  Whether you like Robert Malone or not doesn't matter.  What matters is the truth.  And if he's not qualified to express views on the mRNA vaccines then ask yourself who is then?   

 

So how does Twitter determine this guy's views are not sound science and it's mis-information? Who are the experts employed by Twitter that decided Malone is spreading mis-information?  What are their qualifications as scientists and medical experts?  What are the names of these people?  Does jack Dorsey see himself as an expert at mRNA technology?  Does Twitter employ or consult with anyone that has these skills and knowledge?  The truth once again, is that Twitter or anyone at Twitter has no qualifications to dispute anything this guy says.  If they do then come out and show us.  Who are your experts?  They stay hidden and silent because they're full of crap.  

 

So you won't get any answer to those questions.  Nor will anyone with the ability to force them to answer to this do so.  The censors hide behind a cloak of unanimity.  Working in the shadows.  It all comes down to we don't like what you're saying so you get blocked.  The truth does not matter.  How can any rational person support this?  Suppressing facts leads to poor and incorrect decisions and conclusions.  It seems the only thing that scares people more than the virus is the truth.         

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

For me the issue is relatively straightforward.  Its got nothing to do with the rights of private entities to act with impunity.  The law is clear there are limitations to private freedoms and their ability to disregard customer agreements, contracts, and regulations.  So all these hypothetical comparisons are just that, hypothetical.  It distracts from the real issue.  Which is demanding the truth and making fact based decisions.  Whatever your political, social, or economic views everybody should be demanding that medical decisions be made on sound facts.  Not on politics.  But when you mix science with politics most times you get politics. 

 

And the example I used is Dr. Robert Malone.  The guy that invented mRNA technology and holds all kinds of patents against the technology.  He gets banned from Twitter for spreading "mis-information" based on an almost 3 hour Joe Rogan podcast.  He raises all kinds of issues and provides what sounds like clear and rational science.  Whether you like Joe Rogan or not doesn't matter.  Whether you like Robert Malone or not doesn't matter.  What matters is the truth.  And if he's not qualified to express views on the mRNA vaccines then ask yourself who is then?   

 

So how does Twitter determine this guy's views are not sound science and it's mis-information? Who are the experts employed by Twitter that decided Malone is spreading mis-information?  What are their qualifications as scientists and medical experts?  What are the names of these people?  Does jack Dorsey see himself as an expert at mRNA technology?  Does Twitter employ or consult with anyone that has these skills and knowledge?  The truth once again, is that Twitter or anyone at Twitter has no qualifications to dispute anything this guy says.  If they do then come out and show us.  Who are your experts?  They stay hidden and silent because they're full of crap.  

 

So you won't get any answer to those questions.  Nor will anyone with the ability to force them to answer to this do so.  The censors hide behind a cloak of unanimity.  Working in the shadows.  It all comes down to we don't like what you're saying so you get blocked.  The truth does not matter.  How can any rational person support this?  Suppressing facts leads to poor and incorrect decisions and conclusions.  It seems the only thing that scares people more than the virus is the truth.         

Very well said. I’d suggest that’s it’s  simpler than that. If you’re trying to ‘fundamentally transform America’ there’s simply no room, space, or time for voices and opinions that deter you from that central goal. Period! 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
  • 2 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
33 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

 

It would be way easier if she just said she was going to Washington to impeach the mitherfxver like every decent and acceptable politician does. Come on Man! 

Posted
32 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

It would be way easier if she just said she was going to Washington to impeach the mitherfxver like every decent and acceptable politician does. Come on Man! 

Trump for speaker of the house? That's what you will vote for in November? 

Posted

Who are the bigger face of their party: MTG and Boebert (who will both be gone soon) or "The Squad," who keep getting re-elected?  We know the answer and the harsh reality will hit Dems this November.

Posted
46 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Trump for speaker of the house? That's what you will vote for in November? 

I actually find it interesting. Someone said it could happen through some parliamentary procedure. If that’s true then I’m going to throw MY hat into the ring! I’ll do a way better job. (And to answer your question more directly…my vote doesn’t count for sh$t here in California.)

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 1/31/2021 at 7:51 AM, Backintheday544 said:

If anyone wants to see which party has clearer values:

 

Dem Senator has picture of him groping a boob from 14 years ago. Dems - man you need to step down and leave Congress - and he does.

 

Republican says wildfires were started due to Secret Jewish space lasers, calls for killing for other congressman, and more. Republicans in this thread, that’s fine let’s donate more to her.

 

One party clearly has a clear set of higher values.


Also, for 4 years the right on this board were made people were calling them White Nationalists for voting for Trump. Sometimes the shoe fits especially if you’re in this thread saying you want to give her more money and are trying to still support her after the secret Jewish space lasers came out.

 

 

They still fawn over Marjorie and Matt Gaetz like the pathetic cowards they are

×
×
  • Create New...