Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, The Governor said:

Fox is already correcting the claims.  It's kind of ironic that the crowd you can throw any red meat at, and they'll devour it fell for this.  Newest Republican fear mongering: they're coming for your cheeseburgers, because Biden canceled 4th of July failed.

Posted

Joe Biden is not banning meat and conservatives are stupid for thinking he’d do something like that

 

and also Joe Biden should do something like that.

 

 

 

 

ParchedActiveHamadryad-size_restricted.g

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

 

Where’s the beef?

 

Well, if it’s in your fridge, and you’re trying to figure out what to do with it, looks like you won’t get any ideas from popular recipe site Epicurious.

 

Not anymore:

 

 

 

“Pro-planet.”

 

That’s cute.

 

 

So you’re getting rid of all the beef content on your site? Even the old stuff?

 

No. All our previously published beef content is still available and there are no plans to remove it. You may also see beef pop up in our recipe galleries, most of which are archival pieces of content that get lightly updated every year.

 

So, you’re not doing a complete beef purge, then. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

Where’s the beef?

 

Well, if it’s in your fridge, and you’re trying to figure out what to do with it, looks like you won’t get any ideas from popular recipe site Epicurious.

 

Not anymore:

 

 

 

“Pro-planet.”

 

That’s cute.

 

 

So you’re getting rid of all the beef content on your site? Even the old stuff?

 

No. All our previously published beef content is still available and there are no plans to remove it. You may also see beef pop up in our recipe galleries, most of which are archival pieces of content that get lightly updated every year.

 

So, you’re not doing a complete beef purge, then. 

 

What the ***** is this noise?  So Epicurious is no longer going to post recipes containing beef?  Well they just became websitus no gratis for this Chef.  Idiots. 

Posted
23 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

Where’s the beef?

 

Well, if it’s in your fridge, and you’re trying to figure out what to do with it, looks like you won’t get any ideas from popular recipe site Epicurious.

 

Not anymore:

 

 

 

“Pro-planet.”

 

That’s cute.

 

 

So you’re getting rid of all the beef content on your site? Even the old stuff?

 

No. All our previously published beef content is still available and there are no plans to remove it. You may also see beef pop up in our recipe galleries, most of which are archival pieces of content that get lightly updated every year.

 

So, you’re not doing a complete beef purge, then. 

I don’t know who they are but this is amazing and I just became a Chef!

Posted
Just now, The Governor said:

I don’t know who they are but this is amazing and I just became a Chef!

 

Why is it amazing?  If you want to frequent a site the refuses to post article/recipes about a particular type of meat you are not a Chef.  You're a weenie. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

Why is it amazing?  If you want to frequent a site the refuses to post article/recipes about a particular type of meat you are not a Chef.  You're a weenie. 

Mostly because you hate it.

Posted
7 minutes ago, The Governor said:

Mostly because you hate it.

 

That's what you base your opinions on?  You're not much of a thinker either are you?  

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

That's what you base your opinions on?  You're not much of a thinker either are you?  

Just for the record, when I told you guys about “The war on fatties” I never said that it was in Biden’s infrastructure bill. I just said that legislation was already drawn up and ready to go at some point, meaning 5-7 years from now.

 

Everyone acted like they had never heard the argument before.

 

Will you be eating beef like you are now 10 years from now? NO. You absolutely won’t be.

Edited by The Governor
Posted
13 minutes ago, The Governor said:

Just for the record, when I told you guys about “The war on fatties” I never said that it was in Biden’s infrastructure bill. I just said that legislation was already drawn up and ready to go at some point, meaning 5-7 years from now.

 

Everyone acted like they had never heard the argument before.

 

Will you be eating beef like you are now 10 years from now? NO. You absolutely won’t be.

Trying to take beef away from Americans would be like trying to take away cigs and alcohol.  Never gonna happen.  See prohibition.  

Posted
Just now, daz28 said:

Trying to take beef away from Americans would be like trying to take away cigs and alcohol.  Never gonna happen.  See prohibition.  

Cigarettes are a bad example. Tobacco usage has dropped drastically over the last 10 years. We want people to consume less, not consume none.

Posted
4 minutes ago, daz28 said:

Trying to take beef away from Americans would be like trying to take away cigs and alcohol.  Never gonna happen.  See prohibition.  

Personally, I think we need to annihilate the dairy industry before we tackle beef. That stuff is bad news and kills the most people and puts the biggest strain on the HC system.

 

“Milk does the body good” might be the biggest lie ever told to the American people.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, The Governor said:

Cigarettes are a bad example. Tobacco usage has dropped drastically over the last 10 years. We want people to consume less, not consume none.

The government didn't cut smoking rates, cancer did.  Nutrition awareness has already been tried, and were still a very obese country.  It's engrained into our economy so much that you can't help one without hurting the other.  People want tasty food.  it's that simple. 

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, daz28 said:

The government didn't cut smoking rates, cancer did.  Nutrition awareness has already been tried, and were still a very obese country.  It's engrained into our economy so much that you can't help one without hurting the other.  People want tasty food.  it's that simple. 

Of course they did. They made them 12-20 dollars a pack. People decided that they’d rather use that money elsewhere and smoking dropped immediately. That’s how you change behaviors. Taxation.

 

Chef Jim can still have a greasy burger but it will cost him 67 dollars. Over time, he will decide that the dopamine blast he gets from eating it isn’t worth 67 dollars and he’ll only do it occasionally.

Edited by The Governor
Posted
20 minutes ago, The Governor said:

Of course they did. They made them 12-20 dollars a pack. People decided that they’d rather use that money elsewhere and smoking dropped immediately. That’s how you change behaviors. Taxation.

 

Chef Jim can still have a greasy burger but it will cost him 67 dollars. Over time, he will decide that the dopamine blast he gets from eating it isn’t worth 67 dollars and he’ll only do it occasionally.

Sin taxes are the most incredibly stupid idea that a free country that's free of laws based on religion could ever come up with.  Just so you know cigs on the rez are less than $1 a pack, so there goes that theory.  Also, I still know people who pay the ridiculous prices anyways.  Lying politicians are the single greatest threat to our country, so maybe we should charge people $10k and a random body part to vote?????????????? 

Posted
12 minutes ago, daz28 said:

Sin taxes are the most incredibly stupid idea that a free country that's free of laws based on religion could ever come up with.  Just so you know cigs on the rez are less than $1 a pack, so there goes that theory.  Also, I still know people who pay the ridiculous prices anyways.  Lying politicians are the single greatest threat to our country, so maybe we should charge people $10k and a random body part to vote?????????????? 

Take a walk through NYC these days. You’ll notice thst no one is smoking. It wasn’t like that in the 90’s. It’s because they’re too expensive.

 

Now, everyone still smokes in NC. It’s a tobacco state. Why? Because they’re only $6 a pack.

Posted
2 hours ago, The Governor said:

 

 

Will you be eating beef like you are now 10 years from now? NO. You absolutely won’t be.


Yes I absolutely will be. 
 

1 hour ago, The Governor said:

Take a walk through NYC these days. You’ll notice thst no one is smoking. It wasn’t like that in the 90’s. It’s because they’re too expensive.

 

Now, everyone still smokes in NC. It’s a tobacco state. Why? Because they’re only $6 a pack.


Ah yes. Legislate behavior.  Hey government!  Leave me alone 

Posted (edited)
On 4/21/2021 at 4:18 PM, The Governor said:

What an amazing man that Biden is. Most successful “first 100 days” in history!


IMO, you can’t really have an honest conversation about the environment without first mentioning “meat consumption.”

 

Nothing else really matters until the “fatties” stop this behavior.

 

Regarding civil infrastructure and climate change, I would argue strongly that Biden hasn’t done NEARLY enough to “meet the moment” during his first 100 days. But ugh…whatever…I’ll save that lengthy debate for another day.

 

Being the ostentatious vegan that I am (see: my beautiful profile wallpaper!), I very much like the side debate on meat consumption that has emerged. The fat-shaming tactic isn’t the one I would go with, but you did include a quote from Mean Girls, so that makes it more than okay in my book! Let there be no doubt: those fatty omnivores hate us DIME PIECE vegans for our low BMI’s and for our glowing, phytonutrient-enriched skin!

 

You highlighted the most salient point: reducing meat intake is the best singular thing an individual can possibly do for the environment, due to the extraordinarily disproportionate amount of land/water resources consumed and greenhouse gases emitted relative to plant-based protein/calorie alternatives (legumes, grains, etc.). Same goes for dairy versus plant-based dairy alternatives (almond milk, rice milk, soy milk, cashew milk, etc.).

 

As RochesterRob explained, a regressive sin tax would not be the most desirable way to reduce meat consumption. To be clear: meat/dairy consumption is most definitely a negative environmental externality, so in principle I have no moral qualms taxing it (not to mention the animals rights component or the burden on our already sh!tty health care system). But there are so many better proposed solutions out there: cap-and-trade permit markets for the meat/dairy industries is one such method I would prefer over sin taxes, though so far I’m not 100% convinced of any particular solution. If you insist on going the sin/carbon tax route on meat consumption, you would first need to address the American food desert dilemma that plagues poor communities. The poor need viable alternatives to meat! Oh and dairy must be included in the conversation, too, because the poor in America are disproportionately minorities and minorities are disproportionately lactose intolerant.

 

Affordable lab-grown meat will be the ultimate game changer in this conversation!! I can’t wait for that day to come!! Oooh and speaking of game changers, everyone please check out all of these vegan documentaries for free on YouTube:

 

The Game Changers (2019)

Dominion (2018)

What The Health (2017)

Cowspiracy (2014)

Earthlings (2005)

 

EDIT: spelling error. It’s CIVIL infrastructure, not CIVIC.

Edited by ComradeKayAdams
×
×
  • Create New...