Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, GunnerBill said:

 

PFT, The Athletic, Peter King and SI all reported he had dinner with Cal McNair in December and was promised he would be consulted in advance of both the GM and HC hires. Now in fairness I think a QB has no real role to play in a GM hire. I see the argument on the HC because the two are going to have to work together extremely closely but a GM? See no purpose in involving your QB in that. But that is what Cal McNair promised. He was stupid to promise it but when you do that and then don't deliver... well people are gonna think you are not trustworthy.

 

 

So Watson's agent told a bunch of mouthpieces that he wanted to shill for him that Watson would be "consulted" before the guys were hired?

 

What exactly does "consult" mean in the context?   Input?  Veto?   How do you know he wasn't "consulted" on Caserio or that his opinion was just taken into account and overruled leading to a feeling that he was lied to?  

 

And like you said,  there is no reason for Watson to be involved in the GM choice,  what would he know about THAT job other than maybe wanting hire his own agent as the GM.......which is something that has happened recently in MLB.

 

And Watson submitted his trade demand long before Culley was hired so your timeline is off by weeks in that regard. 

 

Like I said there are a lot of ways and reasons that this is just BS spread by Watson's agent.

 

I'm not sure how closely you follow US sports other than football but this is pretty much standard agent work in MLB and the NBA to try to get a player to more immediately greener pastures.

 

  • Disagree 2
Posted
1 hour ago, BADOLBILZ said:

Like I said.......you dudes need to get some focus factor......you got C.R.A.F.T..........this story was discussed ad nauseam on TSW and you practically live here.:doh:

 

From Sports Illustrated:

 

"Team president Russ Brandon also texted Ryan the next day: “The owner likes red wine. ... “I'm not a red wineguy,” Ryan says, “but that day I drank red wine."

 

It would help then if you linked that article instead.  Because I don't recall any discussion about Brandon having Rex get Pegs drunk so that he would hire him.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Rico said:

Is there language in the contract he agreed to & signed that allows him to demand a trade if he believes the owner isn’t trustworthy? If so, I have no problem at all with him taking this stance.

The contract he agreed to & signed doesn't say he "can't" demand a trade for any reason. Duh.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

It would help then if you linked that article instead.  Because I don't recall any discussion about Brandon having Rex get Pegs drunk so that he would hire him.

image-placeholder-title.webp

Posted
1 hour ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

So Watson's agent told a bunch of mouthpieces that he wanted to shill for him that Watson would be "consulted" before the guys were hired?

 

What exactly does "consult" mean in the context?   Input?  Veto?   How do you know he wasn't "consulted" on Caserio or that his opinion was just taken into account and overruled leading to a feeling that he was lied to?  

 

And like you said,  there is no reason for Watson to be involved in the GM choice,  what would he know about THAT job other than maybe wanting hire his own agent as the GM.......which is something that has happened recently in MLB.

 

And Watson submitted his trade demand long before Culley was hired so your timeline is off by weeks in that regard. 

 

Like I said there are a lot of ways and reasons that this is just BS spread by Watson's agent.

 

I'm not sure how closely you follow US sports other than football but this is pretty much standard agent work in MLB and the NBA to try to get a player to more immediately greener pastures.

 


dang never seen someone bend over backwards this far to defend incompetents like mcnair and easterby. They remind you of yourself maybe?
 

Mcnair confirmed exactly what the agent “fed” to the mouthpieces, chief.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
4 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I don't think being a "jesus freak" makes you any more or less able to run a successful franchise.... I think being such frauds that they have unnecessarily alienated their franchise Quarterback does though.... I don't think Deshaun wants out because they are religious. He wants out because they have behaved in such a way that he no longer trusts a word that comes out of their mouth. And from the reports on Easterby I'm not surprised. For a man of God he certainly seems to have a real machiavellian side to his character.

 

He wants to get out because he signed a contract with a signing bonus rather than do 1 year contracts like Kirk Cousins and is trying to reap benefits of keeping signing bonus.

  • Disagree 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, JoPoy88 said:


dang never seen someone bend over backwards this far to defend incompetents like mcnair and easterby. They remind you of yourself maybe?
 

Mcnair confirmed exactly what the agent “fed” to the mouthpieces, chief.

 

 

No, he did not.:doh:

 

He simply said that he had texted with Watson and that Watson wasn't happy with him and essentially that he "apologized if he offended him". 

 

That's it.    He never said he broke a promise to Watson.

 

Which sounds a lot like Watson was a bit delusional in thinking that he was going to be allowed to pick the teams next GM.

 

 

  • Disagree 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

You linked a story about them drinking when they got the call for the Shady trade.  Talk about an even shorter memory...

 

And I'm sorry for you if you felt "embarrassed" by it.  One would think by your posts you'd be tougher than that.  I guess not. :lol:

 

 

:lol:

 

 

Correct here's the story from the hiring:

 

https://www.si.com/nfl/2015/04/15/rex-ryan-buffalo-bills-new-york-jets

 

Down near the bottom.

 

Brandon advised Ryan to bring some of that red stuff that @eball drinks from the box every night to the second interview.    

 

Methinks some of you guys need to lay off the ol' milk of amnesia............I don't think you can call yourself a Bills fan from that era if you don't remember this story............it got a ton of mileage in the wake of both Rex and Brandon's firings.

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

Correct here's the story from the hiring:

 

https://www.si.com/nfl/2015/04/15/rex-ryan-buffalo-bills-new-york-jets

 

Down near the bottom.

 

Brandon advised Ryan to bring some of that red stuff that @eball drinks from the box every night to the second interview.    

 

Methinks some of you guys need to lay off the ol' milk of amnesia............I don't think you can call yourself a Bills fan from that era if you don't remember this story............it got a ton of mileage in the wake of both Rex and Brandon's firings.

 

 

That's better.  Now...was there a thread here about it?  Because I know I never read that story.  And I wouldn't have wanted to because I didn't want Rex and would rather they hired an offensive-minded coach and kept Schwartz.

 

And I'm not sure how Rex being told to bring a nice bottle of red wine to his 2nd interview meant they were drunk.  But...OK.

Posted
3 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

I may have a terrible memory, I may not have a terrible memory.  But I can quote what you just posted:

Quote

Brandon had Rex get Pegs liquored up to accelerate the hiring process.........remember the whole "get this bottle of wine" story?........and then shortly after the hiring they were all boozing it up on the yacht when the call came in to Whaley offering them McCoy.   Got so liquored up they sealed the deal without talking to Shady and his agent first.

 

Lesson:  Don't drink and drive your franchise into mediocrity.

 

Couple bottles of booze cost Pegs $50M in guaranteed money.

 

Pegs traded his first wife in for his secretary....half her age.....so I wasn't necessarily surprised that he would hire a, shall we say..... "self-indulgent", guy like Rex Ryan.

 

But the whole "man of faith" 180 hiring of McD after previously choosing a guy who was into watching his wife do foot stuff on other dudes......that was a very amusing turn of events and first choice of words.

 

The link you posted is about where the group were located when the enquiry about trading McCoy came through.

 

It says nothing about the Brandon/Rex/Pegula "hiring process"

It says nothing about Brandon having Rex "get Pegs liquored up to accelerate the hiring process...

Bringing someone a bottle of wine as a gift does not equate to "getting liquored up" for most adult males (says nothing about whether the recipient drank it), and even if he did, unless he drank it all himself while everyone else watched, it's not very "liquored up" when the bottle is shared among 5 or 6 people.

 

The story says they were on the yacht when the McCoy trade enquiry came through, and drinking wine is mentioned.  Maybe they were drunk, maybe they each had 2 glasses, which again, is an amount most grown men can drink without being described as "boozing it up" or "got so liquored up that they....".  The story makes neither point.

 

Creative piece of writing on your part, with a "yellow journalism/shock jock" vibe.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

I may have a terrible memory, I may not have a terrible memory.  But I can quote what you just posted:

 

The link you posted is about where the group were located when the enquiry about trading McCoy came through.

 

It says nothing about the Brandon/Rex/Pegula "hiring process"

It says nothing about Brandon having Rex "get Pegs liquored up to accelerate the hiring process...

Bringing someone a bottle of wine as a gift does not equate to "getting liquored up" for most adult males (says nothing about whether the recipient drank it), and even if he did, unless he drank it all himself while everyone else watched, it's not very "liquored up" when the bottle is shared among 5 or 6 people.

 

The story says they were on the yacht when the McCoy trade enquiry came through, and drinking wine is mentioned.  Maybe they were drunk, maybe they each had 2 glasses, which again, is an amount most grown men can drink without being described as "boozing it up" or "got so liquored up that they....".  The story makes neither point.

 

Creative piece of writing on your part, with a "yellow journalism/shock jock" vibe.

 

 

 

 

Here's another piece of creative writing for you:

 

The night before Russ Brandon was planning to announce the cancellation of the "Toronto series" and take all the credit for it........he went to a local establishment and was overheard drunkenly spilling the beans by nearby listeners.

 

The next morning he awoke to find that the local media had reported the story and was furiously trying to figure out who leaked the story and making threats about limiting access to the media etc..:lol:

 

Good ol' milk of amnesia.

 

I don't know how many people you've hired but it's not a great idea for the parties involved to drink at a job interview.   Gifts.......also weird and unnecessary.......especially for a second interview.   And if you think a non-red-wine drinker in Ryan was advised to bring a random "red wine" to the interview by an unscrupulous club president with the idea in mind that the billionaire TPegs was going to put it in his private collection..........well frankly that just seems a bit naive.

 

 

Posted
15 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

I don't know how many people you've hired

 

Correct

 

Quote

 it's not a great idea for the parties involved to drink at a job interview.   Gifts.......also weird and unnecessary.......especially for a second interview.

 

Since I've never had occasion to interview or be interviewed on a billionaire's private yacht, I have no idea what etiquette might apply, but if I were invited to someone's private home for a "meet and greet" (which happens sometimes as an informal job interview or follow on to a job interview), I would bring a "host(ess) gift" (usually wine or chocolates, flowers seem too personal).

 

Quote

 And if you think a non-red-wine drinker in Ryan was advised to bring a random "red wine" to the interview by an unscrupulous club president with the idea in mind that the billionaire TPegs was going to put it in his private collection..........well frankly that just seems a bit naive.

 

My understanding is that it wasn't a "random bottle of wine".  It was a specific wine Brandon advised Ryan to bring.  The point remains that bringing a bottle of wine does not automatically mean Pegula will immediately uncork and consume it prior to concluding whatever hiring discussions he wished to conclude.

 

And then the point remains that a standard 750 ml bottle of wine contains about 6 4 oz glasses of wine, and when served among 4 or 5 people does not, to most grown men, constitute:

Quote

Brandon had Rex get Pegs liquored up to accelerate the hiring process

nor did your link actually provide any information suggesting that's what happened.

 

 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Correct

 

 

Since I've never had occasion to interview or be interviewed on a billionaire's private yacht, I have no idea what etiquette might apply, but if I were invited to someone's private home for a "meet and greet" (which happens sometimes as an informal job interview or follow on to a job interview), I would bring a "host(ess) gift" (usually wine or chocolates, flowers seem too personal).

 

 

My understanding is that it wasn't a "random bottle of wine".  It was a specific wine Brandon advised Ryan to bring.  The point remains that bringing a bottle of wine does not automatically mean Pegula will immediately uncork and consume it prior to concluding whatever hiring discussions he wished to conclude.

 

And then the point remains that a standard 750 ml bottle of wine contains about 6 4 oz glasses of wine, and when served among 4 or 5 people does not, to most grown men, constitute:

nor did your link actually provide any information suggesting that's what happened.

 

 

 

OHHHH suddenly you remember.....

 

As you know I most often find your football (and CA agriculture;)) takes to often be :rolleyes:..........this is one of those cases.

 

I'll keep referencing people I trust for information.........there won't always be links........but I have no problem with you calling it fake news if there isn't said link.  

 

As I've said for years.......no awards for being right on TSW.🥂

 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Rico said:

Reading between the lines is such a lost art these days. :(

 

Yeah people used to make up whatever they wanted before.

Posted
15 minutes ago, Limeaid said:

 

Yeah people used to make up whatever they wanted before.

 

 

Fortunately sports agents would never do that.......otherwise we wouldn't be able to trust everything we hear from "NFL insiders".

 

 

 

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

Fortunately sports agents would never do that.......otherwise we wouldn't be able to trust everything we hear from "NFL insiders".

 

 

I trust IRS agents more than NFL agents and insiders.

Posted
1 hour ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

OHHHH suddenly you remember.....

 

Suddenly I remember what?  The issue is whether (as you claimed):

Quote

Brandon had Rex get Pegs liquored up to accelerate the hiring process

 

I didn't remember that.  You didn't provide any evidence to support that, despite providing a link you called out to me as saying it did.

 

1 hour ago, BADOLBILZ said:

As you know I most often find your football (and CA agriculture;)) takes to often be :rolleyes:..........this is one of those cases.

 

I don't spend time considering what you might or might not think of me or anything I say.  So no, wouldn't claim I know that. 

 

Wouldn't surprise me though; would be entirely consistent with your creative writing in this thread and the "emoji litter" you use as a substitute for actual response or rebuttal when someone has actually made a point you can't refute factually, like pointing out that a standard 750 ml bottle of wine and 5 adults does not exactly constitute evidence of an "unscrupulous" plot to "get Pegs liquored up"

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 3
×
×
  • Create New...