Pine Barrens Mafia Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 This fan is tired of waiting for prospects, it's time for Tom's picks to put up or shut up. Anything less than a playoff win is unacceptable this year, IMO. Anything less means TD should work on his resume. Because 5 years is too long for "rebuilding". One thing: Does our GM think games are won on the periphery rather than the lines?
CoachChuckDickerson Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 This fan is tired of waiting for prospects, it's time for Tom's picks to put up or shut up. Anything less than a playoff win is unacceptable this year, IMO. Anything less means TD should work on his resume. Because 5 years is too long for "rebuilding". One thing: Does our GM think games are won on the periphery rather than the lines? 317149[/snapback] 2 out of 6 picks went towards lineman.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted April 24, 2005 Author Posted April 24, 2005 2 out of 6 picks went towards lineman. 317153[/snapback] Will they start? I know one was a center. What was the other one?
CoachChuckDickerson Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 Will they start? I know one was a center. What was the other one? 317158[/snapback] Would a guy taken in middle of the second or third started? Highly unlikely.
Mark VI Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 And now you have to wait until Sept.... Double your meds. Expect some good cigars at the opener.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted April 24, 2005 Author Posted April 24, 2005 Would a guy taken in middle of the second or third started? Highly unlikely. 317161[/snapback] Really? Second rounders are often viable starters.
CoachChuckDickerson Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 Really? Second rounders are often viable starters. 317165[/snapback] Interior lineman sure. We are lacking a LT. A starting LT was not available with the 55 pick. Look at it this way. You have a 2nd year QB coming in to start. He needs as many weapons as possible. The season doesn't start tomorrow. June 1 cuts are just around the corner. No worries yet. TH still could be traded. Just because everything isn't happening now doesn't mean it isn't going to happen. Stay tuned.
bills_fan Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 Interior lineman sure. We are lacking a LT. A starting LT was not available with the 55 pick. Look at it this way. You have a 2nd year QB coming in to start. He needs as many weapons as possible. The season doesn't start tomorrow. June 1 cuts are just around the corner. No worries yet. TH still could be traded. Just because everything isn't happening now doesn't mean it isn't going to happen. Stay tuned. And I'm still not sold on Ron Edwards. LT and DT. Anthony Bryant was available.
wwovince Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 Sorry to say but more likely we have 1 more year of rebuilding seeing we are starting with a young QB. So GET OVER IT!! Its possible we do something with JP right away but more likely its next year where we start our playoff runs.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted April 24, 2005 Author Posted April 24, 2005 Sorry to say but more likely we have 1 more year of rebuilding seeing we are starting with a young QB. So GET OVER IT!! Its possible we do something with JP right away but more likely its next year where we start our playoff runs. 317263[/snapback] Ludicrous. 6 years to MAYBE make the playoffs? Unacceptable in today's NFL.
mead107 Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 even if we went 0-16 for the next 5 years i would still be a BILLS fan , would you ????
Fake-Fat Sunny Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 The question for you however, is that lets say we replaced TD right now, how many years of rebuilding do you think the Bills would have to go through for the replacement for TD to make the playoffs? Since you put the TD number at 5 years, I assume you endorse him for 2005. if he is canned after this year, right off 2006 and probably 2007 as thye new guy reverses the TD way and puts his new way into place. If you endorse abandoning TD right now (even though he obviously will be in place this year(, it sounds like you are endorsing a plan where we win in 2008 even if things work well for new order.
Assquatch Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 even if we went 16 - 0 for the next 5 years i would still be a BILLS fan , would you ???? 317274[/snapback] 16-0 for the next five years, and lots of people would be bills "fans" Even T-Bone.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted April 24, 2005 Author Posted April 24, 2005 The question for you however, is that lets say we replaced TD right now, how many years of rebuilding do you think the Bills would have to go through for the replacement for TD to make the playoffs? Since you put the TD number at 5 years, I assume you endorse him for 2005. if he is canned after this year, right off 2006 and probably 2007 as thye new guy reverses the TD way and puts his new way into place. If you endorse abandoning TD right now (even though he obviously will be in place this year(, it sounds like you are endorsing a plan where we win in 2008 even if things work well for new order. 317290[/snapback] The question here is: Is it better to continue with an unsuccessful regime ad infinitum or make the change when it's apparent it's not working. I'm willing to give him this year, next year at the MOST, but 6 years is a long time to rebuild.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted April 24, 2005 Author Posted April 24, 2005 even if we went 16 - 0 for the next 5 years i would still be a BILLS fan , would you ???? 317274[/snapback] Assuming you mean 0-16, yes. But I would still call the administration out on the carpet for it.
Frez Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 This fan is tired of waiting for prospects, it's time for Tom's picks to put up or shut up. Anything less than a playoff win is unacceptable this year, IMO. Anything less means TD should work on his resume. Because 5 years is too long for "rebuilding". One thing: Does our GM think games are won on the periphery rather than the lines? 317149[/snapback] Joe, i'm with you 100%!
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted April 24, 2005 Author Posted April 24, 2005 Joe, i'm with you 100%! 317300[/snapback] You are? You must be the only one.
mary owen Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 Really? Second rounders are often viable starters. 317165[/snapback] which 2005 starter in this draft should he have taken at #55. wasn't much left. DON'T YOU THINK THEY WOULD HAVE TAKEN THEIR "ANSWER TO THE OLINE PROBLEM" IF HE WERE THERE???? who is this Super Prospect????
CoachChuckDickerson Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 The question here is: Is it better to continue with an unsuccessful regime ad infinitum or make the change when it's apparent it's not working. I'm willing to give him this year, next year at the MOST, but 6 years is a long time to rebuild. 317294[/snapback] I reallt don't think that the problem with the TD regime has been talent. He has shown he will do what it takes to get the talent needed. The primary problem was coaching. It has been corrected. 9-7 last year and damn close to a playoff birth.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted April 25, 2005 Author Posted April 25, 2005 which 2005 starter in this draft should he have taken at #55. wasn't much left. DON'T YOU THINK THEY WOULD HAVE TAKEN THEIR "ANSWER TO THE OLINE PROBLEM" IF HE WERE THERE???? who is this Super Prospect???? 317305[/snapback] Seen that's just it. They could have traded up to grab an OL prospect, but they didn't. I think TD thinks he's smarter than he is. See: Kris Farris, Ryan Denney, Brandon Spoon, etc...
Recommended Posts