billvernsays Posted January 25, 2021 Posted January 25, 2021 I just saw that after the games that we are picking 30th with GB picking 29. Does anyone know why the Packers get the tiebreaker is it SOS?
Big Turk Posted January 25, 2021 Posted January 25, 2021 6 minutes ago, billvernsays said: I just saw that after the games that we are picking 30th with GB picking 29. Does anyone know why the Packers get the tiebreaker is it SOS? They played a weaker schedule so they get an earlier pick. 1 1
Real McClappy Posted January 25, 2021 Posted January 25, 2021 1 minute ago, Big Turk said: They played a weaker schedule so they get an earlier pick. Which makes zero sense 1 1
billvernsays Posted January 25, 2021 Author Posted January 25, 2021 Hopefully the Clemson RB or N Harris falls to 30. 2 3
Big Turk Posted January 25, 2021 Posted January 25, 2021 3 minutes ago, Real McNasty said: Which makes zero sense Thought process is if a team with a weaker schedule finishes in the same place they are worse than the team with the stronger schedule. 2 1 1
Virgil Posted January 25, 2021 Posted January 25, 2021 5 minutes ago, Real McNasty said: Which makes zero sense Better draft picks go to weaker teams. Our record was harder to achieve than theirs 1 1
Real McClappy Posted January 25, 2021 Posted January 25, 2021 1 minute ago, Big Turk said: Thought process is if a team with a weaker schedule finishes in the same place they are worse than the team with the stronger schedule. Thanks, I honestly didn't know that. I figured it still go by seeding or record in the conference.
Estro Posted January 25, 2021 Posted January 25, 2021 Bills most glaring needs to better compete with the Chiefs: 1 - weapon in the passing game 2 - Pass Rusher 3 - CB 4 - Cover LB (if Milano is not retained)
ClemsonBills Posted January 25, 2021 Posted January 25, 2021 I think bills move from 30. Just a hunch
Ralonzo Posted January 25, 2021 Posted January 25, 2021 23 minutes ago, billvernsays said: Hopefully the Clemson RB or N Harris falls to 30. They both will, and Edge or CB is a greater need at 30 than either
purple haze Posted January 25, 2021 Posted January 25, 2021 28 minutes ago, ClemsonBills said: I think bills move from 30. Just a hunch Hope so. Trade back into the 2nd and get a third. With a amount of important FA’s this off-season and Allen about to cash-in, the draft is paramount. Need as many picks as they can get.
Aussie Joe Posted January 25, 2021 Posted January 25, 2021 46 minutes ago, ClemsonBills said: I think bills move from 30. Just a hunch Down to take an RB 45 minutes ago, Rc2catch said: Trade that pick. Go get a proven player You want an RB right? 1
The Jokeman Posted January 25, 2021 Posted January 25, 2021 2 hours ago, Real McNasty said: Which makes zero sense If go by the logic if two teams have an identical record by other tie breakers than the worse team is one one that played weaker opponents as if they were infact a better team than they'd have a better record. 1
Rc2catch Posted January 25, 2021 Posted January 25, 2021 6 hours ago, Aussie Joe said: Down to take an RB You want an RB right? Running back is low on the priority list. We have two backs on rookie deals. I’m sure they’ll grab a free agent but I don’t see them drafting one 1
Sweats Posted January 25, 2021 Posted January 25, 2021 Draft order means nothing to Beane.....trade down into the first and grab Harris at RB. That'll cure what ails ya.
maryland-bills-fan Posted January 25, 2021 Posted January 25, 2021 2 minutes ago, Rc2catch said: Running back is low on the priority list. We have two backs on rookie deals. I’m sure they’ll grab a free agent but I don’t see them drafting one So....... to get by the Chiefs,,,, how are you going to convince them NOT to double team our wide receivers OR to not do a straight, "ears pinned back" pass rush? The danger in playing a man-to-man pass defence is that the DB will be watching the WR and not see the ball coming and will not see the running back running downfield at all. The danger in an all out pass rush is that it leaves big gaps in the center of the line for the RB or QB. If the RB is fast and the LB's have been schemed away or are outrun, you have a big chunk of yardage. Can we bribe them to play into our hands on this?
Rc2catch Posted January 25, 2021 Posted January 25, 2021 1 minute ago, maryland-bills-fan said: So....... to get by the Chiefs,,,, how are you going to convince them NOT to double team our wide receivers OR to not do a straight, "ears pinned back" pass rush? The danger in playing a man-to-man pass defence is that the DB will be watching the WR and not see the ball coming and will not see the running back running downfield at all. The danger in an all out pass rush is that it leaves big gaps in the center of the line for the RB or QB. If the RB is fast and the LB's have been schemed away or are outrun, you have a big chunk of yardage. Can we bribe them to play into our hands on this? I didn’t say we shouldn’t run the ball.
maryland-bills-fan Posted January 25, 2021 Posted January 25, 2021 1 minute ago, Rc2catch said: I didn’t say we shouldn’t run the ball. OK. But what I see missing is that really fast RB or guy like #10, who is so fast that the defences have to worry about a big chunk from a missed tackle. More important is that all the pursuit angles and where the defence is positioned on the field become different with such a guy. .. ... .... Remember how the Bills used McKenzie to replicate Lamar Jackson in the prep to the Ravens game. We don't have that type of running threat and it changes a LOT of things.
Recommended Posts