Doc Posted January 20, 2022 Posted January 20, 2022 So then, I guess every election in American history is invalid, eh Joey? 1
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted January 20, 2022 Posted January 20, 2022 10 minutes ago, Doc said: So then, I guess every election in American history is invalid, eh Joey? The non winner ALWAYS claims this… just like each an every winner salutes the historically unflappable integrity of the amazing election they win. 1
B-Man Posted January 20, 2022 Posted January 20, 2022 Joe’s Big Lie: Biden Casts Doubt On Legitimacy of Midterm Elections, Blaming Election Integrity Laws Trending Politics, by Eric Thompson https://trendingpolitics.com/joes-big-lie-biden-casts-doubt-on-legitimacy-of-midterm-elections-blaming-election-itegrity-l-ethom/
reddogblitz Posted January 22, 2022 Posted January 22, 2022 (edited) 3 hours ago, B-Man said: Yes. We all know President Biden loves war and it is good for the economy and unites the people against a common enemy. Just what the doctor ordered. I am watching this very closely. Come on man , isn't there a Grenada or Panama out there we can easily beat? Edited January 22, 2022 by reddogblitz
B-Man Posted January 23, 2022 Posted January 23, 2022 “At its core, the filibuster is not about stopping a nominee or a bill, it is about compromise and moderation. That is why the Founders put unlimited debate in. … It does not mean I get my way. It means you may have to compromise. You may have to see my side of the argument. That is what it is about, engendering compromise and moderation.” [Abolishing the filibuster] “is ultimately an example of the arrogance of power. It is a fundamental power grab by the majority party. Folks who want to see this change want to eliminate one of the procedural mechanisms designed for the express purpose of guaranteeing individual rights, and they also have a consequence, and would undermine the protections of a minority point of view in the heat of majority excess. We have been through these periods before in American history but never, to the best of my knowledge, has any party been so bold as to fundamentally attempt to change the structure of this body.” “What shortsightedness, and what a price history will exact on those who support this radical move.” “This is being done in the name of fairness? Quite frankly, it is the ultimate act of unfairness to alter the unique responsibility of the Senate and to do so by breaking the very rules of the Senate. … This is the single most significant vote, as I said earlier, that I will have cast in my 32 years in the Senate.” “[T]he nuclear option [abolishing the filibuster] extinguishes the power of Independents and moderates in this Senate. That is it. They are done. Moderates are important only if you need to get 60 votes to satisfy cloture. They are much less important if you need only 50 votes.” The Senator who said this? His name is Joe Biden. https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2022/01/when-the-filibuster-was-good.php
B-Man Posted January 24, 2022 Posted January 24, 2022 25 minutes ago, BillStime said: and as usual, the board dunce misses the point. No one cares that Biden swore.....😂 It's the hypocrisy of the two statements, Lord, how did he get through elementary school ?
BillStime Posted January 24, 2022 Posted January 24, 2022 2 minutes ago, B-Man said: and as usual, the board dunce misses the point. No one cares that Biden swore.....😂 It's the hypocrisy of the two statements, Lord, how did he get through elementary school ? Seriously? Hypocrisy? In Washington? No foresight, as usual Bonnie dear... Remember when Conald Trump said he would have no time to golf if he were president and then spent over 265 days golfing during his presidency??
Doc Posted January 25, 2022 Posted January 25, 2022 1 hour ago, B-Man said: No mean tweets, though...
BillStime Posted January 25, 2022 Posted January 25, 2022 39 minutes ago, Doc said: No mean tweets, though... Laughable coming from the F Your Feelings cult.
B-Man Posted January 27, 2022 Posted January 27, 2022 On Wednesday’s broadcast of the Fox News Channel’s “Ingraham Angle,” host Laura Ingraham contrasted President Joe Biden’s vow to nominate a black woman to the Supreme Court to replace outgoing Justice Stephen Breyer with then-Sen. Biden’s opposition to and multiple filibusters of the nomination of Janice Rogers Brown to the federal bench by then-President George W. Bush in 2003 and 2005 and remarked that “race and gender, they only count if you’re thought to be a committed judicial activist, judicial leftist.” Ingraham said, [relevant remarks begin around 2:50] “I’m thinking back on the nomination of what would’ve been another first, which is the nomination of Janice Rogers Brown. And she was filibustered by none other than Joe Biden. So, this idea of appointing a black woman to the judiciary, he voted three times against confirming her just to be a U.S. circuit judge. I mean, this wasn’t even to the Supreme Court. So, race and gender, they only count if you’re thought to be a committed judicial activist, judicial leftist.” https://video.foxnews.com/v/6293921900001#sp=news-clips
Chef Jim Posted February 1, 2022 Posted February 1, 2022 5 hours ago, B-Man said: And this has been what I've been saying all along. 1
B-Man Posted February 2, 2022 Posted February 2, 2022 “MODERATE JOE” WAS ALWAYS A LIE: Coalition of States Call on Biden to Rescind Federal Reserve Nominee Over ‘Radical’ Views. “We, the undersigned, oppose Ms. Raskin’s radical banking and economic views and are deeply concerned that she would use the supervisory authority as Vice-Chair for Supervision at the Federal Reserve Bank to disrupt the private banking sector, reliable energy supplies, and the U.S. economy.” https://humanevents.com/2022/02/01/coalition-of-states-call-on-biden-to-rescind-federal-reserve-nominee-over-radical-views/
Recommended Posts