B-Man Posted May 10, 2021 Posted May 10, 2021 Return to normalcy? Biden waives ethics rules for union lobbyists https://hotair.com/jazz-shaw/2021/05/09/return-to-normalcy-biden-waives-ethics-rules-for-union-lobbyists-n388696 1 1
SydneyBillsFan Posted May 10, 2021 Posted May 10, 2021 On 5/7/2021 at 8:30 AM, Unforgiven said: Maybe some lefties here can provide proof that biden was ever on the right side of anything. That is about as likely as one guy proving to another guy that he was not the one who farted in an elevator - when they were the only two guys in the elevator! 1
B-Man Posted May 10, 2021 Posted May 10, 2021 US Census Bureau Confirms Huge Conflict in Total Number of Voters in 2020 Election by Joe Hoft The results of the 2020 Election are again not supported by evidence. This time the data reported by the Census Bureau conflicts with the election results.According to the US Census Bureau’s results from the 2020 Census, their are obvious discrepancies with the results of the 2020 Election. (Snip) According to the Census, the recorded number of people voting in 2020 was tallied at 154,628,000. On the other hand, official results place the number of actual ballots cast slightly north of 158 million. That’s a discrepancy of nearly four million votes. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/evidence-2020-election-trickery-people-voted-reported-2020-census-data/ 1 1
B-Man Posted May 12, 2021 Posted May 12, 2021 Transparency ?..................you didn't really believe that did you ? https://www.politico.com/newsletters/west-wing-playbook/2021/05/10/this-email-is-on-background-with-quote-approval-492792 Reporters fume at White House ‘quote approval’ rules. The practice allows the White House an extra measure of control as it tries to craft press coverage. At its best, quote approval allows sources to speak more candidly about their work. At its worst, it gives public officials a way to obfuscate or screen their own admissions and words. The Biden White House isn’t the first to employ the practice. Many reporters say it’s reminiscent of the tightly controlled Obama White House. The Trump White House used it, too. But reporters say Trump’s team did so less frequently than Biden’s team — which also used the tactic during the campaign — and a number of current White House reporters have become increasingly frustrated by what they see as its abuse. “The rule treats them like coddled Capitol Hill pages and that’s not who they are or the protections they deserve,” said one reporter. “Every reporter I work with has encountered the same practice,” said another. But, as is often the case with the unwieldy White House press corps, there is a collective action problem. Reporters are reluctant to say no to using background with quote approval because it could put them at a disadvantage with their competitors. “The only way the press has the power to push back against this is if we all band together,” said the first reporter. At least one White House reporting team has been talking internally about reaching out to other outlets to push the Biden team to stop the practice. “Have any reporters talked about mutinying?” the second reporter asked us. “If you start fomenting an insurrection, keep me updated.” Reached for comment, White House spokesperson MICHAEL GWIN asked to go off the record. Gwin later texted a statement from press secretary JEN PSAKI. “We would welcome any outlet banning the use of anonymous background quotes that attack people personally or speak to internal processes from people who don’t even work in the Administration,” she said. “At the same time, we make policy experts available in a range of formats to ensure context and substantive detail is available for stories. If outlets are not comfortable with that attribution for those officials they of course don’t need to utilize those voices.” Related: WH Press Secretary Jen Psaki Wishes Biden Maybe Didn’t Talk So Much. https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/jim-treacher/2021/05/06/wh-press-secretary-jen-psaki-wishes-biden-maybe-didnt-talk-so-much-n1445064 1
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted May 12, 2021 Posted May 12, 2021 16 minutes ago, Doc said: But Trump... He wasn’t any better or worse.. more of the same
Doc Posted May 12, 2021 Posted May 12, 2021 3 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: He wasn’t any better or worse.. more of the same I originally was going to say "meet the new boss..." But Joe is worse.
B-Man Posted May 13, 2021 Posted May 13, 2021 ‘We are screwed’: President Joe Biden makes it very clear that he does not want to talk about the Colonial Pipeline ransom [video] https://twitchy.com/sarahd-313035/2021/05/13/we-are-screwed-president-joe-biden-makes-it-very-clear-that-he-does-not-want-to-talk-about-the-colonial-pipeline-ransom-video/
Chef Jim Posted May 13, 2021 Posted May 13, 2021 22 minutes ago, B-Man said: ‘We are screwed’: President Joe Biden makes it very clear that he does not want to talk about the Colonial Pipeline ransom [video] https://twitchy.com/sarahd-313035/2021/05/13/we-are-screwed-president-joe-biden-makes-it-very-clear-that-he-does-not-want-to-talk-about-the-colonial-pipeline-ransom-video/ Lets set up a poker game with Biden. We’d clean up. WORST POKER FACE EVER !!! 1
B-Man Posted May 14, 2021 Posted May 14, 2021 There really is another choice. It's incoherent to demand that people follow science and to misrepresent the options. There's also the choice to avoid both the mask and the vaccination. Everyone knows that. If I had to defend the President, I'd say it's so obviously not true that no one takes it as true, so it doesn't count as a lie.
Chef Jim Posted May 15, 2021 Posted May 15, 2021 15 hours ago, B-Man said: Why? Wait I know why.......TRUMP!
B-Man Posted May 17, 2021 Posted May 17, 2021 BECAUSE LABELING IT TERRORISM WOULD REQUIRE THEM TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT: Jonathan Turley: Why the White House won’t define pipeline attack as terrorism. https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/553690-why-the-white-house-wont-define-darksides-pipeline-attack-as-terrorism Also, they’re reserving the “terrorism” label for their political opposition.
Doc Posted May 17, 2021 Posted May 17, 2021 (edited) 3 hours ago, B-Man said: BECAUSE LABELING IT TERRORISM WOULD REQUIRE THEM TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT: Jonathan Turley: Why the White House won’t define pipeline attack as terrorism. https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/553690-why-the-white-house-wont-define-darksides-pipeline-attack-as-terrorism Also, they’re reserving the “terrorism” label for their political opposition. No need to label it as everyone knows what it was. But as predicted, after all the tough talk last year about what Joey would do to Putin...he will do nothing. Edited May 17, 2021 by Doc 1
B-Man Posted May 17, 2021 Posted May 17, 2021 The Neanderthals Were Right https://redstate.com/bonchie/2021/05/17/the-neanderthals-were-right-n381634
Recommended Posts