Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Philo said:

Rams so beat up after this game. Hard to see them competing with GB next week (assuming CHI doesn't upset NO).

 

Donald is one of the most resilient players in all of sports. He will play and still give rodgers trouble.

Posted
3 minutes ago, jeremy2020 said:

 

To be fair, there's not much difference between a 100% goff and a 50% one.

I’m not sure why Goff wasn’t playing if he could go in as second string in the playoffs. John Wolford is not what you want, even with a 50% starter. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, SirAndrew said:

I’m not sure why Goff wasn’t playing if he could go in as second string in the playoffs. John Wolford is not what you want, even with a 50% starter. 

 

"Starter" is a strong word to use for Goff. Sure, it's technically true, but Blake Bortles was also a "Starter"

Edited by jeremy2020
Posted
Just now, jeremy2020 said:

 

"Starter" is a strong word to use for Goff;

True, but Wolford is almost a Tuel level guy. Goff is familiar with the system that allows him to be average sometimes. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Mark Vader said:

Yes, the Seahawks were clearly the favorites, still the Rams are not a pushover.

 

3.5 at home isn't much of a favorite.

 

Seattle has serious personnel issues, though. They just don't have a high percentage offense and a bad line.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, y2zipper said:

 

3.5 at home isn't much of a favorite.

 

Seattle has serious personnel issues, though. They just don't have a high percentage offense and a bad line.

Yes, if Wilson doesn’t have success chucking the ball downfield to Metcalf, they’ll have issues. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, PetermansRedemption said:

This is an embarrassing loss for the Seahawks. Lose to a Donald-less Rams defense when their offense is starting John Walford and then Goff at 50%. 

 

Agreed.  We're to hard on the Bills.  Seattle lost by 10 points to a team with a QB playing without a thumb.

 

 

Posted

We should be thanking our lucky stars that we have Josh at QB. Just got finished watching 2 really bad QB performances by Goff and Wilson.

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Ta111 said:

We should be thanking our lucky stars that we have Josh at QB. Just got finished watching 2 really bad QB performances by Goff and Wilson.

No quarterback is going to look good behind Seattle's O line. 

Not to mention Rams did have the number one defense

Edited by Comebackkid
Posted

The Seahawks looked totally out of sync today. The outstanding pick 6 play was a game changer.  I was really hoping for one of our Dbs to jump a route like that on one of Rivers noodle arm passes but we were nowhere near!

Posted

Wilson talked a bunch this season, but he's been bad for several weeks now. Metcalf been talking. 

 

If you're gonna talk, you better makes plays when they matter. 

Posted
15 minutes ago, jeremy2020 said:

Seahawks gave up two firsts for Jamal Adams who got toasted over and over and missed tackles. Now they have to give a huge contract to him. Ouch.

but he got named 1st team all pro somehow

×
×
  • Create New...