Kemp Posted January 20, 2021 Posted January 20, 2021 On 1/9/2021 at 12:33 PM, snafu said: I don’t recall telling you when I thought polarization in our politics became a problem, so eff off with that, fool. Funny, I said twice that I don’t use twitter. It is morons like you who hung on trump’s words for 4 years. You couldn’t get enough of his daily stupidity so you could justify your hatred. All the while you missed the 4 year buildup of backlash against not just Trump, but all Republicans just for being in the “wrong” party. And January 6 was your grand finale Trump final outrage. What will you do with yourself now? Who to hate? Who’s left, the “stupid” and “evil” party you don’t support? If you think what’s going on is a good thing then you’ve been just as manipulated as those idiots who entered the Capitol. When you support a racist, criminal and traitor, you are the same. Simple stuff. I have never cared what an idiot thinks of me. 4
snafu Posted January 20, 2021 Posted January 20, 2021 18 minutes ago, Kemp said: When you support a racist, criminal and traitor, you are the same. Simple stuff. I have never cared what an idiot thinks of me. 11 days later you reply. So I'm not an idiot. Thanks for the reinforcement. By the way, Trump lost and he left the White House, so maybe it is time for you to go lock your fantasy fiction thread. 1 1 1
Kemp Posted January 22, 2021 Posted January 22, 2021 On 1/20/2021 at 3:54 PM, snafu said: 11 days later you reply. So I'm not an idiot. Thanks for the reinforcement. By the way, Trump lost and he left the White House, so maybe it is time for you to go lock your fantasy fiction thread. 11 days later because America's nightmare is over. I don't come here as often because the scum has left. Fantasy fiction? He tried to overthrow the election, incited a riot that led to multiple deaths, and your take is that nothing much happened. As long as there are people who think like you, scum will keep popping up doing stupid and evil things. Stupid never learns. 2 1
Kemp Posted January 22, 2021 Posted January 22, 2021 https://www.newsweek.com/georgia-lawyer-who-kicked-pelosis-door-during-riots-denied-release-over-social-media-posts-1563538 Lots of dangerous scum energized by the great lie of Republicans. 1
BillStime Posted January 25, 2021 Posted January 25, 2021 On 1/9/2021 at 12:16 AM, Buffarukus said: im not sure if its age or what. i brought up #walkaway but there are alot more accounts that i just dont think were extremists. just right perspectives. its like people truly want one party rule. noone to watchdog, contradict, or call out our officials or themselves. if there's one party rule they no longer need your vote. no longer will serve anyone that does not directly benefit themselves. that goes for the rightwingers as well. its a path history has shown goes down in horrifiic ways. 2
Buffarukus Posted January 25, 2021 Posted January 25, 2021 1 hour ago, BillStime said: i read the affidavit. straka was at the capital and posting on his private twitter account. so as a founder of #walkaway do his personal actions automatically become relagated to the organization he founded? a relavent question of why #walkaway was censored before he was even charged or at least explanation of how #walkaway platform was used in the attack? its a important question and i am not defending straka for his actions. is it ok to condemn the foundation on the actions of the founder? is the fbi sharing info with twitter on who they are investigating so they can preemptively delete the account? im seriously asking? as i dont follow #walkaway. maybe it was a front for straka to gain zelots on his private account and they were there committing crimes. if not, then its removal is wrong, or we need to have the same standards for ALOT more companies and organizations. the news is full of high ranking ceo and owners committing crimes of all ranges, but we remove that person from that at which they are in control of we do not destroy and condemn the organization itself ESPECIALLY before convicted in a court of law.
BillStime Posted January 26, 2021 Posted January 26, 2021 1 hour ago, Buffarukus said: i read the affidavit. straka was at the capital and posting on his private twitter account. so as a founder of #walkaway do his personal actions automatically become relagated to the organization he founded? a relavent question of why #walkaway was censored before he was even charged or at least explanation of how #walkaway platform was used in the attack? its a important question and i am not defending straka for his actions. is it ok to condemn the foundation on the actions of the founder? is the fbi sharing info with twitter on who they are investigating so they can preemptively delete the account? im seriously asking? as i dont follow #walkaway. maybe it was a front for straka to gain zelots on his private account and they were there committing crimes. if not, then its removal is wrong, or we need to have the same standards for ALOT more companies and organizations. the news is full of high ranking ceo and owners committing crimes of all ranges, but we remove that person from that at which they are in control of we do not destroy and condemn the organization itself ESPECIALLY before convicted in a court of law. Do you think Facebook has the resources to see where most of the content posted on its site originates from?
Buffarukus Posted January 26, 2021 Posted January 26, 2021 1 hour ago, BillStime said: Do you think Facebook has the resources to see where most of the content posted on its site originates from? sure. by originated from do you mean straka or washington d.c. on the day of the riot?
BillStime Posted January 26, 2021 Posted January 26, 2021 41 minutes ago, Buffarukus said: sure. by originated from do you mean straka or washington d.c. on the day of the riot? In general - clearly there was suspicious activity that posed a threat - its their business they can do what they want right? You didn’t mind when the bakery declined to make that wedding cake for the gay couple, right?
Buffarukus Posted January 26, 2021 Posted January 26, 2021 (edited) 18 minutes ago, BillStime said: In general - clearly there was suspicious activity that posed a threat - its their business they can do what they want right? You didn’t mind when the bakery declined to make that wedding cake for the gay couple, right? i don't like to generalize and am interested in clarity which is why im asking questions. if a terms of service was broken id like to read about it, or if the organization was committing criminal activity, I'd also like to hear it. no i think it was pretty dumb not to bake a cake based only on somones sexual prefrances. money is money and a cake is a cake. are you using this to deflect from the questions i asked? not sure what the two have to do with each other? a tos is offered for one that i haven't heard was broken Edited January 26, 2021 by Buffarukus 1
BillStime Posted January 26, 2021 Posted January 26, 2021 19 minutes ago, Buffarukus said: i don't like to generalize and am interested in clarity which is why im asking questions. if a terms of service was broken id like to read about it, or if the organization was committing criminal activity, I'd also like to hear it. no i think it was pretty dumb not to bake a cake based only on somones sexual prefrances. money is money and a cake is a cake. are you using this to deflect from the questions i asked? not sure what the two have to do with each other? a tos is offered for one that i haven't heard was broken Ask Facebook.
Buffarukus Posted January 26, 2021 Posted January 26, 2021 Just now, BillStime said: Ask Facebook. k. good talk.
TSOL Posted January 26, 2021 Posted January 26, 2021 44 minutes ago, BillStime said: Who needs free speech when we have our big tech overlords to tell us what to think. 1 1
BillStime Posted January 26, 2021 Posted January 26, 2021 3 minutes ago, TSOL said: Who needs free speech when we have our big tech overlords to tell us what to think. 1
TSOL Posted January 26, 2021 Posted January 26, 2021 23 minutes ago, BillStime said: The masters tools will never be allowed to dismantle the masters house
BillStime Posted January 26, 2021 Posted January 26, 2021 10 minutes ago, TSOL said: The masters tools will never be allowed to dismantle the masters house How did we ever survive before big tech? Amazing.
reddogblitz Posted January 26, 2021 Posted January 26, 2021 5 hours ago, BillStime said: This is great that they are banning the people you don't like. What happens when they start banning people you do like? Ever thought of that? High tech book burning. 3 hours ago, BillStime said: How did we ever survive before big tech? Amazing. Just fine.
TBBills Posted January 26, 2021 Posted January 26, 2021 37 minutes ago, reddogblitz said: This is great that they are banning the people you don't like. What happens when they start banning people you do like? Ever thought of that? High tech book burning. Just fine. What happens? Well it will be b.c they broke ToS and they deserved it. Just like being banned on here... It's not different. 1
BillStime Posted January 26, 2021 Posted January 26, 2021 38 minutes ago, reddogblitz said: This is great that they are banning the people you don't like. What happens when they start banning people you do like? Ever thought of that? High tech book burning. Just fine. You play with fire you get burned.
Recommended Posts