Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
25 minutes ago, QLBillsFan said:

Colts fans see our run D as a huge flaw. While not perfect it’s improved significantly. Like Henry Bills can focus and limit run game. Colts are 2nd best team for scoring on opening drive. If we can manage their run game and eliminate points on opening drive we should be good. Bills early jitters could make it close at half. But agree control Taylor force 3rd and long. 


Even when our run D was bad early in the year, we could at least sell out to stop the run if we needed to. That’s what we did against Tenn. unfortunately, Tanny killed us through the air and on his QB scrambles. But now we that our D has improved, we can play a bit more Balanced on D, and I think still do pretty well against the run.

 

I think people though are expecting too much out of the D. Taylor averages 5 YPC, basically against everyone. The colts Ran pretty effectively even against the Steelers (not a ton of carries— but good YPC).  We just have to make some key stops, especially on 3rd down and in the redZone, and avoid huge homerun runs. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, Jpsredemption said:

Not sure this is the team we should have wanted to face most. As time goes on the more I realize this is terrifying and the Colts could steal this one. 

 

Im nervous, only because of the gravity of the game. Win or go home.

 

A lot of people seem to believe the Colts will run all over the Bills and that could happen.

Yet, the only way the Colts can keep up with our scoring is through turn overs and short fields.

No stupid plays, pick 6 plays or turnovers in our territory then this will not be a close game.

 

I don’t care if they ran for 500 yards last week. They played a 1-14 Jacksonville team going through the motions  and they

were less then a score ahead going into quarter 4.

 

Lets hope we start out hot and not take much figuring out time.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

Indy struggled against JACKSONVILLE, while the Bills dropped 56 on the #1 scoring defense in the league.

 

Bills' weakness against the run is exaggerated, as we improved from 125 rush yards per game pre-bye to 94 per game post-bye.

Posted (edited)

Bills weakness against the run is exaggerated but I feel like Jonathan Taylor's rise over the past 5-6 weeks has been pretty understated. He's really good. 253 yards last week. He's not Henry but he may be the most complete back that we've seen since Henry. I can envision awful scenarios where Taylor and Hines chunk it up while Rivers game manages and dinks and dunks efficiently. Colts shouldn't be able to keep up with us so I hope Allen airs it out early and often. 

Edited by Nelius
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
2 hours ago, BillsBytheBay said:

Taylor was good but come on people... he put up 150 on Vegas... and 250 in week 17 against a jags team that mailed it in.

  I expect them to have a couple of splash plays,  but the Colts haven't controlled anything with the run at all this year.

 

I know that people discount RB performance because "they're a dime a dozen" and all that but are really going to overlook 400 yards over 2 NFL games now? That's really good. He also did that over the last 4 weeks of the season after he seemingly figured something out. Jonathan Taylor is good and could be a problem tomorrow. A small problem hopefully, but not one that should be completely dismissed. Hard to just toss away the fact that the put up 250 yards in just his last game, c'mon now.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Bs.. with a minute left last game josh had no problems getting a TD. to many teams already tried limiting Josh and our offense  via run. This team can drive down the field for 7 minutes or score in a minute... Im not going to be scared of a running attack...  The only thing that scares me is if Rivers manages to get hot on a cold day...

Posted
30 minutes ago, Nelius said:

Bills weakness against the run is exaggerated but I feel like Jonathan Taylor's rise over the past 5-6 weeks has been pretty understated. He's really good. 253 yards last week. He's not Henry but he may be the most complete back that we've seen since Henry. I can envision awful scenarios where Taylor and Hines chunk it up while Rivers game manages and dinks and dunks efficiently. Colts shouldn't be able to keep up with us so I hope Allen airs it out early and often. 

Bills defense have to be wary of the checkdowns to the RBs. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Solomon Grundy said:

Bills defense have to be wary of the checkdowns to the RBs. 

 

It's Philip's favorite play. It's how Ekeler started winning fantasy games. Hines isn't Ekeler, but he's an athlete that runs a 4.4 and Rivers seems to love him. LBs might get a workout tomorrow.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, Nelius said:

 

It's Philip's favorite play. It's how Ekeler started winning fantasy games. Hines isn't Ekeler, but he's an athlete that runs a 4.4 and Rivers seems to love him. LBs might get a workout tomorrow.

Gotta tackle. Milano needs another game like last week 

Posted
2 hours ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said:


Even when our run D was bad early in the year, we could at least sell out to stop the run if we needed to. That’s what we did against Tenn. unfortunately, Tanny killed us through the air and on his QB scrambles. But now we that our D has improved, we can play a bit more Balanced on D, and I think still do pretty well against the run.

 

I think people though are expecting too much out of the D. Taylor averages 5 YPC, basically against everyone. The colts Ran pretty effectively even against the Steelers (not a ton of carries— but good YPC).  We just have to make some key stops, especially on 3rd down and in the redZone, and avoid huge homerun runs. 


Fair pt. Miyagi San.  Remember that guy who ran over 2000 yards this season (King Henry - 5.4 yds/carry) was kept to 3.0 in our game.

 

You make very good pts.  We can slow down Taylor like Henry and then what do they have to beat us.  They have one WR and a couple of good TE’s.
 

As far as the SB25 is not relevant.  We used a no huddle 2 min. offense the whole game, and Levy and Kelly were stubborn and outcoached.  BB stated he was not going to let our passing offense beat them.  Therefore he played 8 men back just like he tried this year in the wind game.  This coaching staff was smart enough to run the ball down their throat for approximately 190 yards.  Thurmon from memory ran about 145 yards on 14-15 carries.  Had Marv simply forced Jimbo to keep using the running game, it would have forced the Giants to play more up front eventually, or would’ve been a slug f3st between Otis and Thurmon and the Giants wouldn’t have been able to control the clock, as we would’ve done the same.  That singular point would’ve caused a different outcome.  We had a very good line back then.

 

Back to Saturday.  This coaching staff is better than that one, and Rivers is not Hostettler.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, Nelius said:

 

It's Philip's favorite play. It's how Ekeler started winning fantasy games. Hines isn't Ekeler, but he's an athlete that runs a 4.4 and Rivers seems to love him. LBs might get a workout tomorrow.


They are known for that strategy like Tua and Miami.  Our DB’s jammed them at the LOS, and broke up their timing.  They don’t have an explosive offense like us.  They employ this strategy and we will kill them.  They have to try and keep up, and they can’t do it.

Posted

The Bills will still get at least 8 or 9 possessions regardless of what the Colts do. If they score TD's on half of those, that's still 28 points.

 

This isn't the 90's. I think Bills fans need to let go of that loss to the Giants. It has no bearing on this game.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

All the Jonathan Taylor talk does really leave me reflecting again on how he should have been the consensus #1 back in last year's draft. I don't give running backs first round grades very often. I had a first round grade on Taylor. He is a stud. 

 

On a team with a properly dangerous Quarterback he could be Derrick Henry good.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Lets not over think this. Taylor is a good, not great player. He amassed half his rushing yards in Dec against teams like Hou (83), LV (150),Jax (253) and Pitt(74). HALF!!!That's  566 yards out of 1169 for the season. That means he ran for 603 yards in the previous 12 games in 3 months. 486 yards in Dec. against 3 teams that were a combined 13-35 with nothing to play for. The only D they actually played that was decent was Pitt and they choked away that game. 

 

Now they play a team that is motivated and knows the only chance they have to win is to run, kill clock and keep the Josh and the offense off the field. They will take Taylor out of the equation and force Old Man Rivers to win with his noodle arm in the cold. 

 

I like Taylor but he's not the second coming of Eric Dickerson. 

2 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

All the Jonathan Taylor talk does really leave me reflecting again on how he should have been the consensus #1 back in last year's draft. I don't give running backs first round grades very often. I had a first round grade on Taylor. He is a stud. 

 

On a team with a properly dangerous Quarterback he could be Derrick Henry good.

See above post. I like our debates on players and teams😊

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, billsbackto81 said:

Lets not over think this. Taylor is a good, not great player. He amassed half his rushing yards in Dec against teams like Hou (83), LV (150),Jax (253) and Pitt(74). HALF!!!That's  566 yards out of 1169 for the season. That means he ran for 603 yards in the previous 12 games in 3 months. 486 yards in Dec. against 3 teams that were a combined 13-35 with nothing to play for. The only D they actually played that was decent was Pitt and they choked away that game. 

 

Now they play a team that is motivated and knows the only chance they have to win is to run, kill clock and keep the Josh and the offense off the field. They will take Taylor out of the equation and force Old Man Rivers to win with his noodle arm in the cold. 

 

I like Taylor but he's not the second coming of Eric Dickerson. 

See above post. I like our debates on players and teams😊

 

I agree he is not quite a "great" player right now. But he will be. He is an absolute beast. He has elite vision. Beyond Derrick Henry and the two playmaker backs who aren't really just running backs - McCaffrey and Kamara - I am not sure there is a back in the NFL I'd swap him for. 

 

I don't disagree with the general point on the Colts... I have been on the "overrated" train all year with them and to be honest am a little surprised they managed to win 11 games. But Taylor? He is legit. 

Edited by GunnerBill
Posted
2 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I agree he quite great player right now. But he will be. He is an absolute beast. He has elite vision. Beyond Derrick Henry and the two playmaker backs who aren't really just running backs - McCaffrey and Kamara - I am not sure there is a back in the NFL I'd swap him for. 

 

I don't disagree with the general point on the Colts... I have been on the "overrated" train all year with them and to be honest am a little surprised they managed to win 11 games. But Taylor? He is legit.

I expect him to be a much better player as time goes but I gotta say, unless the run D lays an egg I see no reason why a motivated Bills team can't slap the brakes on him.    

×
×
  • Create New...