Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

But it was a semi peaceful protest.   Statues, buildings mean nothing, right.   Cops shoot and kill unarmed protester.  Lefties parrot msm..  smh

No one is going to celebrate a police killing.

 

What is noticable that police have treated these chuckleheads with kid gloves compared to the unmitigated brutality used at the BLM protests this summer. We watched in DC as reporters observing were assaulted on the grounds on a church so Trump gets a photo op with a Bible.

 

We are not so much celebrating the death of a right winger. We are instead noting that it turns out tear gas isn't necessary when a mob is breaching the doors to threaten the people inside, so why did they need to use it this summer.

  • Like (+1) 6
Posted
8 minutes ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said:

What is noticable that police have treated these chuckleheads with kid gloves compared to the unmitigated brutality used at the BLM protests this summe

Dc was burned for days.  Front lawn occupied.  Rocks thrown at cops.  No cops shot anyone.  You all and the msm said it was "mostly peaceful". 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

The rules for use of deadly force is different for the Secret Service than the regular police.  They aren’t going to use kid gloves when you storm a federal building and get near the VP.  

  • Like (+1) 4
Posted
15 hours ago, Big Blitz said:

Trump's fault......wait they actually did say that.  

 

 

 

And these things go unresponsive by the posters here. You all begged for this civil unrest and now are somehow surprised by it.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

I've worked in a secured federal building.

 

Someone bypasses security and tries to force their way into an interior secured area, I expect the guards to respond with lethal force. And the infiltrator should expect to be shot.

 

Period.

  • Like (+1) 4
Posted
5 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

I've worked in a secured federal building.

 

Someone bypasses security and tries to force their way into an interior secured area, I expect the guards to respond with lethal force. And the infiltrator should expect to be shot.

 

Period.

The police allowed them in, directed them in, guided them in. All for show.

Posted
4 minutes ago, wnyguy said:

The police allowed them in, directed them in, guided them in. All for show.

Even if this were true (it's not ... there is video of "protesters" hitting the Capitol Police with pepper spray, etc., but go ahead and keep reading your QAnon posters), there's no question that the protesters were NOT being allowed into the inner secured area where the woman was shot. They were trying to break down the door/glass. 

Again, someone who has not been screened, who may very well be armed, is trying to force her way into a secured interior location of the Capitol. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Even if this were true (it's not ... there is video of "protesters" hitting the Capitol Police with pepper spray, etc., but go ahead and keep reading your QAnon posters), there's no question that the protesters were NOT being allowed into the inner secured area where the woman was shot. They were trying to break down the door/glass. 

Again, someone who has not been screened, who may very well be armed, is trying to force her way into a secured interior location of the Capitol. 

Civil unrest, you guys begged for it. 

Posted

They brought IED's into Congress. The president's attorney urged "Trial by Combat." The President and his attorney should be jailed. The Congressman who continued to object to the certification after the attempt to blow up Congress should be expelled. 

  • Like (+1) 2
×
×
  • Create New...