Augie Posted January 6, 2021 Posted January 6, 2021 (edited) 3 minutes ago, SirAndrew said: Beasley is much better than Beebe imo, but it’s also tough to compare different eras. I do think Beasley is more athletic and runs better routes. Beebe was pure deep speed, Beasley is about underneath quickness. They are absolutely nothing alike as football players. Not to mention, Bass is a kicker and Moorman was a punter. We have a few issues here..... . Edited January 6, 2021 by Augie 1
Bob in STL Posted January 6, 2021 Posted January 6, 2021 (edited) 18 minutes ago, quinnearlysghost88 said: ^^^ I don’t agree. For starters Reed played slot quite a bit. Beebe was the deep threat. Ballard was a RT, Dawkins is a LT so maybe he is Wolford. Knox is more like McKellar than Metzellars. Bass is a kicker, Kelso a FS. Comparing different eras is pointless. Edited January 6, 2021 by Bob in STL
Draconator Posted January 6, 2021 Posted January 6, 2021 8 minutes ago, FireChans said: Diggs isn’t Reed. But did Andre ever floss on the sidelines? Did he?
Ga boy Posted January 6, 2021 Posted January 6, 2021 11 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said: I don't want this team to be any of those guys. They lost 4 Super Bowls, not looking to replicate that. It get that ... but I don’t see any team with the O-line of early 90s Gmen, Hogs and Boys. I like our chances 🏈 1
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted January 6, 2021 Posted January 6, 2021 It’s 2021 the 90’s team was the 90’s team this team is totally different and unique JMO
DJB Posted January 6, 2021 Posted January 6, 2021 34 minutes ago, quinnearlysghost88 said: ^^^ You do understand that your entire thesis doesn't need to be in the title correct? 1
quinnearlysghost88 Posted January 6, 2021 Author Posted January 6, 2021 Just now, DJB said: You do understand that your entire thesis doesn't need to be in the title correct? Trying to save everyone a click 1
quinnearlysghost88 Posted January 6, 2021 Author Posted January 6, 2021 Just now, Doc said: Mobiler? Yeah it does along with the -er theme.
Rochesterfan Posted January 6, 2021 Posted January 6, 2021 I am pretty sure we can all agree this thread is something that rhymes with “barbage”. Some might have a stronger rhyme, but that is ok. That is about the extent of it. 2
Draconator Posted January 6, 2021 Posted January 6, 2021 1 minute ago, quinnearlysghost88 said: Trying to save everyone a click But yet here we are 1 1
quinnearlysghost88 Posted January 6, 2021 Author Posted January 6, 2021 Just now, Rochesterfan said: I am pretty sure we can all agree this thread is something that rhymes with “barbage”. Some might have a stronger rhyme, but that is ok. That is about the extent of it. What is it?
Rochesterfan Posted January 6, 2021 Posted January 6, 2021 2 minutes ago, quinnearlysghost88 said: What is it? Come up with whatever you want as long as it rhymes - then we can all agree.
SirAndrew Posted January 6, 2021 Posted January 6, 2021 5 minutes ago, Ga boy said: It get that ... but I don’t see any team with the O-line of early 90s Gmen, Hogs and Boys. I like our chances 🏈 I agree, some people don’t like comparing eras, but it’s just good fun sometimes. I think the 90’s Bills would actually be more suited to win multiple Super Bowls in today’s era, than they were in the 90’s. There were so many physical hard nosed teams back in the day. It was more difficult to win based on having an elite offense when you faced those teams. The entire league is designed for elite offensive teams to win titles these days. 1
Recommended Posts