Jump to content

Yes, There are Tapes: Trump pressured Georgia Secretary of State in an extraordinary hour-long call: “I just want to find 11,780 votes”


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Backintheday544 said:


On Fulton:

 

Germany: We chose Cobb County because that was the only county where there’s been any evidence submitted that the signature verification was not properly done.

 

Not how he says ONLY county. That’s why Cobb was picked and not Fulton.

 

They would have got Fulton if they provided any evidence. They didn’t. Why didn’t they?

 

 

Randomly selecting a few thousand signatures in an unprecedented election season and crap like this tells you all you need to know..

 

Mark Zuckerberg alone spent an awful lot of energy and money in Fulton:

 

An analysis by the Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society suggests a [partisan element to the CTCL project]. Since September 1, 2020, the CTCL has made at least $63.7 million in grants to election commissions in 18 counties and two cities for what the CTCL calls the coronavirus “safe elections” project.

 

More than 99.5 percent of this funding — $63.4 million — went to election commissions in 17 counties and two cities won by Hillary Clinton in 2016. Less than one half of one percent of the funding — a mere $289,000 — went to a county Donald Trump won in 2016, Hays County, Texas, which the president barely won by a margin of 50.4 percent to 49.6 percent.

 

A significant portion of these grants — more than $13.9 million — went to election commissions in areas Hillary Clinton won with more than 80 percent of the vote. Ten million dollars went to the city of Philadelphia in Pennsylvania, which Clinton won with 84 percent of the vote, $3.5 million went to Wayne County, Michigan, which Clinton won with 96 percent of the vote, and $467,000 went to the election commission in the city of Flint, Michigan, which Clinton won with 84 percent of the vote.

 

The Center for Tech and Civic Life grant will help pay for:

 

♦ Almost 700 partitioned, secure voting system carriers to house the 2,258 ballot marking devices and optical scanners at all polling locations

♦ Hazard pay for roughly 2,300 workers at a rate of $100 per worker, per election.

♦ Additional temporary employees who will help prepare, process and tabulate absentee-by-mail ballots.

♦ Ballot mailing

♦ Advertising to promote absentee and early voting. 

 

Fulton County Elections Director Richard Barron told the Fulton County Board of Commissioners how he was able to secure the grant for the county, but failed to mention the name of the funding group–CTCL–or the fact they had only one day earlier, on September 1, received a $250 million donation from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan, to fund the Fulton County grant.

 

In those three counties combined, Joe Biden’s net vote margin in 2020 over Donald Trump was 374,344, an increase of 168,703 over Hillary Clinton’s net vote margin of 205,641.

That 168,703 vote net margin increase for Biden in 2020 in the three counties that received $15.8 million in grants from the Zuckerberg-funded CTCL was 76 percent of the 221,751 net vote margin improvement for Biden that powered him to a 10,610 vote lead in Georgia with 99 percent of precincts reporting.

 

Between September 1, 2020 and October 30, 2020, the CTCL contributed more than $16.6 million for “safe elections” in six Georgia counties, as Ballotpedia reported.

 

All six counties voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016. Based on currently available public reports, it appears that no Georgia county that voted for Donald Trump in 2106 received a CTCL grant in 2020.

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/11/09/most-of-bidens-221000-vote-margin-gain-in-georgia-in-3-counties-that-received-15-million-from-zuckerberg-funded-safe-elections-project/?_gl=1*16a7dsb*_ga*YTlWU2oxbmNHRzF6UWpDYUhqcGNEOUxRNkVWWWtnRDh2NnU1RWRWSG54dmV5cC05RGt1X2tsOUs4a2paS1M3Tg..

Edited by Big Blitz
  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted
1 hour ago, Big Blitz said:

 

 

Randomly selecting a few thousand signatures in an unprecedented election season and crap like this tells you all you need to know..

 

Mark Zuckerberg alone spent an awful lot of energy and money in Fulton:

 

An analysis by the Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society suggests a [partisan element to the CTCL project]. Since September 1, 2020, the CTCL has made at least $63.7 million in grants to election commissions in 18 counties and two cities for what the CTCL calls the coronavirus “safe elections” project.

 

More than 99.5 percent of this funding — $63.4 million — went to election commissions in 17 counties and two cities won by Hillary Clinton in 2016. Less than one half of one percent of the funding — a mere $289,000 — went to a county Donald Trump won in 2016, Hays County, Texas, which the president barely won by a margin of 50.4 percent to 49.6 percent.

 

A significant portion of these grants — more than $13.9 million — went to election commissions in areas Hillary Clinton won with more than 80 percent of the vote. Ten million dollars went to the city of Philadelphia in Pennsylvania, which Clinton won with 84 percent of the vote, $3.5 million went to Wayne County, Michigan, which Clinton won with 96 percent of the vote, and $467,000 went to the election commission in the city of Flint, Michigan, which Clinton won with 84 percent of the vote.

 

The Center for Tech and Civic Life grant will help pay for:

 

♦ Almost 700 partitioned, secure voting system carriers to house the 2,258 ballot marking devices and optical scanners at all polling locations

♦ Hazard pay for roughly 2,300 workers at a rate of $100 per worker, per election.

♦ Additional temporary employees who will help prepare, process and tabulate absentee-by-mail ballots.

♦ Ballot mailing

♦ Advertising to promote absentee and early voting. 

 

Fulton County Elections Director Richard Barron told the Fulton County Board of Commissioners how he was able to secure the grant for the county, but failed to mention the name of the funding group–CTCL–or the fact they had only one day earlier, on September 1, received a $250 million donation from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan, to fund the Fulton County grant.

 

In those three counties combined, Joe Biden’s net vote margin in 2020 over Donald Trump was 374,344, an increase of 168,703 over Hillary Clinton’s net vote margin of 205,641.

That 168,703 vote net margin increase for Biden in 2020 in the three counties that received $15.8 million in grants from the Zuckerberg-funded CTCL was 76 percent of the 221,751 net vote margin improvement for Biden that powered him to a 10,610 vote lead in Georgia with 99 percent of precincts reporting.

 

Between September 1, 2020 and October 30, 2020, the CTCL contributed more than $16.6 million for “safe elections” in six Georgia counties, as Ballotpedia reported.

 

All six counties voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016. Based on currently available public reports, it appears that no Georgia county that voted for Donald Trump in 2106 received a CTCL grant in 2020.

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/11/09/most-of-bidens-221000-vote-margin-gain-in-georgia-in-3-counties-that-received-15-million-from-zuckerberg-funded-safe-elections-project/?_gl=1*16a7dsb*_ga*YTlWU2oxbmNHRzF6UWpDYUhqcGNEOUxRNkVWWWtnRDh2NnU1RWRWSG54dmV5cC05RGt1X2tsOUs4a2paS1M3Tg..


Or if you read a bit more, to get the grant you needed to apply for it. Conservatives were against these grants so it’s no surprise many conservative jurisdictions did not apply for the grant. 
 

That’s like Trump saying why did I get no mail in ballots when he told people mail in ballots don’t work and don’t use them.

 

You can find out more about this grant program here: https://www.techandciviclife.org/grant-awards/

 

It even has the people who applied for them.

 

As you mentioned, the Thomas Moore Institute sued in several states to stop these grants. They lost every case.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Backintheday544 said:


Or if you read a bit more, to get the grant you needed to apply for it. Conservatives were against these grants so it’s no surprise many conservative jurisdictions did not apply for the grant. 
 

That’s like Trump saying why did I get no mail in ballots when he told people mail in ballots don’t work and don’t use them.

 

You can find out more about this grant program here: https://www.techandciviclife.org/grant-awards/

 

It even has the people who applied for them.

 

As you mentioned, the Thomas Moore Institute sued in several states to stop these grants. They lost every case.

 

 

The government using private citizens "donations" (Zuckerberg in this case....the guy that controls the information they want these voters to see) to fund elections is totally not a problem. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

 

 

The government using private citizens "donations" (Zuckerberg in this case....the guy that controls the information they want these voters to see) to fund elections is totally not a problem. 

It isn't, it is actually allowed and republicans are doing the exact same. They have actually spent more money on TV ads than Dems.

 

You just like one side of the story. 

 

But please try to take this thread off course b.c it's bad for you.

 

You can thank republicans for the ability of outside companies to spend unlimited amounts of money on campaigning, and ability to help out the side they want.

Edited by TBBills
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Big Blitz said:

 

 

The government using private citizens "donations" (Zuckerberg in this case....the guy that controls the information they want these voters to see) to fund elections is totally not a problem. 


Not an issue for me and not an issue for courts who heard the cases about it.

Posted
17 hours ago, Big Blitz said:

 

 

And he did NONE of that.

 

I heard the entire call today.  

 

Absolutely absurd to think this call which was also apparently via the legal-eeze I'm reading that since specific to current legal challenges was perfectly normal that's why you had the people on the call that you did and they even say this during the call.  

 

And, half of what he told the SOS he tweets daily.  But this is tampering?  You kidding me?  Or pressuring?  

 

He asked for the SOS to recognize fraud one side believes they can show happened---just get me 11K (I know you can get more but this is the minimum bc you won't audit 4 million votes but really you just refuse to verify them).  

 

Telling him that fraud occurred and "here is why" isn't "pressuring" .....

 

What they left out for the low infos was Trump's issue:  Why can't SOS show the Fulton County Data that the presidents legal team is claiming signature verification never properly happened with the disputed votes?  

 

Now why does that matter?  Because the SOS admits on the call that FRAUD (via unverified signatures) happened in Cobb County. 

 

But that didn't happen in Fulton?  Oh no.  Absolutely not.  In case you were wondering.....that's inner city Atlanta.  

 

K.  

 

It along with all sorts of other fraud by mail during election season happened.  The people in charge of finding refuse to look.  Period.  Not because it isn't there.  But they are too cowardly to handle the communist regime's media and social media communications department charging them with voter suppression or tampering or stealing an election.  And half the UniParty hates him anyway.  Don't get giddy about that they hate all of you to.  

 

 

There is a reason the media in charge of calling these races wanted this election over by November 5th.  

 

Trump wins and it's perfectly fine for the media to challenge electors to reject the results.  Dems never call to challenge results or verify votes because they know exactly what they'll find and it isn't Republican fraud.  

 

Did you listen to the call, too?  There is a difference between "hearing" and "listening."

Posted

If Trump is doing something unlawful then take his ass to the wood shed i have and will never have a problem with that as long as there is undeniable evidence but don't make up BS like a someone did and pay them to make up a story book and then bring it in to be looked at as if it's the truth then spend $32 million to prove a fantasy .

 

If there's smoke then there's the possibility of a fire so check it out - in every case not just those that help democrats or Republicans. If any one in DC would truly look around with a unbiased eye i'm sure they could find enough corruption to send most them ass bags that reside there home .

 

I'll also bet in some cases if we were to do out here in the real world what some of these career politicians have done we would be in a 4x8 cell some where .

 

I truly wish we could say a prayer like the kid in the movie LIAR LIAR and all of them would have to tell the truth they would have to fire 98% of them which wouldn't be a bad thing . They really need to clean house !! 

 

I know after that last line will give the haters a bunch of ammo to bash but if any one thinks one side is more upstanding or moral than the other you are living a fantasy because corruption has no boundaries especially when there is money to be made or printed in the US case .

 

It's like the old saying "locks are made to keep a honest man honest" crooks will always find a way to be crooked it doesn't matter their political affiliation . JMHO.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, T master said:

If Trump is doing something unlawful then take his ass to the wood shed i have and will never have a problem with that as long as there is undeniable evidence

 

Listen to the call.

 

Read the law.

 

Indict in 16 days.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said:

 

Listen to the call.

 

Read the law.

 

Indict in 16 days.

 

Go for it wrong is wrong / a sin is a sin book him Danno if it's a law and he broke it nail his ass but don't make up BS like in the past ...

Posted
19 hours ago, TBBills said:

dont think you understand what is going on... If you listened to the entire hour long tape and still think like this than you are beyond help and should never be allowed to vote b.c you are obviously way too brainwashed to have a real opinion.

 

Hmmmm.  Not allowing people to vote.  Sounds facist.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
19 hours ago, Doc said:

This time, they got him...

Actually the voters got him.  In a few weeks this douche bag is out.  He can talk about hoaxes and crowd sizes and HCQ and the merits of the McRib and whatever the eff else he wants to rant about somewhere else.  Can’t happen soon enough.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

Actually the voters got him.  In a few weeks this douche bag is out.  He can talk about hoaxes and crowd sizes and HCQ and the merits of the McRib and whatever the eff else he wants to rant about somewhere else.  Can’t happen soon enough.  

 

Yeah, and then we get that idiotic senile do-nothing Joe.  Awesome!

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Yeah, and then we get that idiotic senile do-nothing Joe.  Awesome!

 

He can't possibly do any less than Trump.  It's ironic the fat bastard wants to keep the job that he isn't doing as we pile up thousands of COVID deaths a day.  How's the vaccine rollout going?  Not so well.  But plenty of time to encourage Brad Raffensperger to commit election fraud.  He's a joke and so are his followers. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

He can't possibly do any less than Trump.  It's ironic the fat bastard wants to keep the job that he isn't doing as we pile up thousands of COVID deaths a day.  How's the vaccine rollout going?  Not so well.  But plenty of time to encourage Brad Raffensperger to commit election fraud.  He's a joke and so are his followers. 

 

Ask the governors.  They knew it was coming out for months now.

Posted
1 minute ago, Doc said:

 

Ask the governors.  They knew it was coming out for months now.

 

Pretty smart by Trump.  National crisis.  Perfect time to talk up states rights instead of coordinating a response with consistent rules and procedures.  Sound, sound leadership.  

Posted
3 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Pretty smart by Trump.  National crisis.  Perfect time to talk up states rights instead of coordinating a response with consistent rules and procedures.  Sound, sound leadership.  

 

Yup, just started talking up states rights. LOL!

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Yup, just started talking up states rights. LOL!

 

I suppose it's better that he talks up states' rights than telephones Brad Raffensperger.  That one didn't shake out all that well for him. 

Edited by SectionC3
×
×
  • Create New...