Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 1/3/2021 at 5:44 PM, MJS said:

Time will tell if he is right or wrong. Good QB's can be VERY difficult to find. Jimmy G is good. He isn't elite. He's in the Tannehill category.

Expand  

I think it’s a separate question if he should have let him go or if he let go a really good QB.   Jimmy G plays intelligently and is mobile.  He’s a solid starting QB but I don’t think he is top 15.  I think he’s in that 16-20 range which is solid.

Posted
  On 1/3/2021 at 5:21 PM, Coach Tuesday said:

Jimmy G back to NE, Darnold to SF, Stafford to TB?

Expand  

 

  On 1/3/2021 at 5:23 PM, klos63 said:

They're going to have to pay a bit. Not going to get a $1MM Cam like deal.

Do you think Brady will be gone?

Expand  

Yeah, I don't see that at all. At least Brady would not leave. Not with Tampa Bay scheduled to play New England in Foxboro next season.

 

Is there any chance the Buccaneers outright cut Brady?

Posted

Really good player, massive availability issue. 22-8, efficient passer until it's 30 starts in 4 years. Starting QB is the position where you have to have someone that can play 16. The issue is that the player to replace him isn't on the roster.

 

49ers strike me as a team that that could do the Wentz reclamation project.

 

Posted
  On 1/3/2021 at 7:45 PM, Mark Vader said:

 

Yeah, I don't see that at all. At least Brady would not leave. Not with Tampa Bay scheduled to play New England in Foxboro next season.

 

Is there any chance the Buccaneers outright cut Brady?

Expand  

Not the way he's playing right now. He's getting hot just in time for the playoffs. Why would they even consider it?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

I commend Shanahan for ripping off the band aid  SF has a a good defense and great running game.  Why eat up cap space for a qb when he isn't asked to carry the team  Fails when he has to and is often not available due to injury

Posted
  On 1/3/2021 at 6:46 PM, ProcessAccepted said:

Brady is gone so he'd probably like the QB room a lot more. NE has the $$ to bring in talent to put around him. I think this is quite a likely outcome.

Expand  

 

Yeah but they need to spend it.  And there isn't much talent at the skill positions in FA next year.

 

  On 1/3/2021 at 9:07 PM, peterpan said:

He will be in NE by March.  

 

Stupid move by the 9ers. 

Expand  

 

Not necessarily.  They might be able to get a draft pick out of it.

Posted
  On 1/3/2021 at 6:00 PM, Doc said:

 


This would’ve been my reply. 

 


I doubt they’ll still want to pay that.

Expand  


and I would’ve told you I never said he’d be the qb of the future. 
 

do you remember how many terrible retreads we brought in waiting for our guy?

Posted
  On 1/3/2021 at 9:48 PM, Doc said:

 

They'd take a massive cap hit.

Expand  

 

The Falcons might be in total tear down though and as Beane showed in 2018 here if you are going to do that you can bear a single year of horrible cap hit. Might not make sense for Atlanta we will see.... but if he becomes available that is where San Fran look.

Posted (edited)
  On 1/3/2021 at 9:50 PM, NoSaint said:

and I would’ve told you I never said he’d be the qb of the future. 
 

do you remember how many terrible retreads we brought in waiting for our guy?

Expand  

 

OK.  But what's the point of bringing him in if he's not the QB of the future for them?  What is his incentive to sign if they're not paying him big bucks and committing to him as the QB of the future?

 

  On 1/3/2021 at 9:52 PM, GunnerBill said:

The Falcons might be in total tear down though and as Beane showed in 2018 here if you are going to do that you can bear a single year of horrible cap hit. Might not make sense for Atlanta we will see.... but if he becomes available that is where San Fran look.

Expand  

 

Anything is possible.  But a $50M cap hit, even spread out over 2 years, is gigantic.

Edited by Doc
Posted
  On 1/3/2021 at 9:54 PM, Doc said:

 

OK.  But what's the point of bringing him in if he's not the QB of the future for them?  What is his incentive to sign if they're not paying him big bucks and committing to him as the QB of the future?

 

 

Anything is possible.  But a $50M cap hit, even spread out over 2 years, is gigantic.

Expand  


what was the point of us bringing in Orton? or kolb? Or cassel? 
 

It’s a safe vet floor for them til they have a young guy that can step up. 
 

he will be unlikely to get a large dollar long term commitment. He will possibly get low end starter money with year to year structure. Or I think likely much like cam, dalton, Winston, etc... take less to try to go to the right situation during the cap dip and hope to earn a payday later 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
  On 1/3/2021 at 10:11 PM, NoSaint said:

what was the point of us bringing in Orton? or kolb? Or cassel? 
 

It’s a safe vet floor for them til they have a young guy that can step up. 
 

he will be unlikely to get a large dollar long term commitment. He will possibly get low end starter money with year to year structure. Or I think likely much like cam, dalton, Winston, etc... take less to try to go to the right situation during the cap dip and hope to earn a payday later 

Expand  

 

Competition for a young QB, possibly mentoring.  But they were all cheap, unlike what Jimmy G will be.  He's not going to sign with the Cheaters, or anyone else, for a 1 or 2 year cheap deal.  Especially if he has other suitors, and he likely will.

Edited by Doc
×
×
  • Create New...