Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Liked him when he played for the Phins. Lost track of him on the Texans.  Could be a deep threat decoy to open routes for others.  

Edited by wjag
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Excellent move.

 

Gabe Davis is awful. Never gets open unless it's a blown coverage. He creates zero separation vs man coverage. The fumble and the lack of effort vs the Pats was the cherry on top. Can't trust this bad rookie in playoff games.

 

Stills is a huge upgrade as an outside WR over Davis.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, whatdrought said:

The most critical aspect of this, is that there isn’t a single number between 10-19 available... which means he’ll be in the 80’s by default which will automatically make him our best reciever!

This is your thing now. I respect it. 

Posted
Just now, YoloinOhio said:

This is your thing now. I respect it. 


It is. It always has been. I think it’s @Logic that’s there with me on it.

 

Kumerow looked so sweet in 87. 
 

I’d love 81 for Stills, but I guess that’s Kroft. Maybe 83?

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, JoshAllenReceipts said:

Excellent move.

 

Gabe Davis is awful. Never gets open unless it's a blown coverage. He creates zero separation vs man coverage. The fumble and the lack of effort vs the Pats was the cherry on top. Can't trust this bad rookie in playoff games.

 

Stills is a huge upgrade as an outside WR over Davis.

Really can’t trust Davis. He’s been decent as a rookie but only if he’s schemed wide open. Did have that nice TD catch vs Miami. But he’s no go to guy. 

1 minute ago, whatdrought said:


It is. It always has been. I think it’s @Logic that’s there with me on it.

 

Kumerow looked so sweet in 87. 
 

I’d love 81 for Stills, but I guess that’s Kroft. Maybe 83?

That’s rare territory ... not retired? I know Lee wore it too. Probably should be retired for Reed. 

Edited by YoloinOhio
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, JoshAllenReceipts said:

Excellent move.

 

Gabe Davis is awful. Never gets open unless it's a blown coverage. He creates zero separation vs man coverage. The fumble and the lack of effort vs the Pats was the cherry on top. Can't trust this bad rookie in playoff games.

 

Stills is a huge upgrade as an outside WR over Davis.

 

Umm...you don't watch games much do you?

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

 

Umm...you don't watch games much do you?

 

 

Read the post directly above yours, agreeing with what I said.

 

YOU don't watch the games. Gabe Davis is the weakest link on the Bills offense. 

Edited by JoshAllenReceipts
Posted

This is about adding a player that can greatly add do WR Depth as well as ST and speed. 
 

this is about a run to the SuperBowl. Get weapons that’s help that run. If this signing happens I love it. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, JoshAllenReceipts said:

 

 

Read the post directly above yours.

 

YOU don't watch the games. Gabe Davis is the weakest link on the Bills offense.

Did we get a new tight end?

Posted
3 minutes ago, JoshAllenReceipts said:

 

 

Read the post directly above yours.

 

YOU don't watch the games. Gabe Davis is the weakest link on the Bills offense.

He should be the weakest link..  Lol he’s supposed to be the 5th option in the offense. Stills was the 4th-5th option in Houston. 

Posted
1 minute ago, gobills404 said:

Did we get a new tight end?

 

You realize that Gave Davis creates 0 separation and struggles to get open, right? 

 

He is also a rookie, and was the worst player on the field against the Pats.

Just now, Rc2catch said:

He should be the weakest link..  Lol he’s supposed to be the 5th option in the offense. Stills was the 4th-5th option in Houston. 

 

Right...and Stills is a better WR than Davis.

 

Stills >>> Davis.

 

This is obvious. Why are we even arguing this?

Posted

We could just view this as another aspect of the 'continuous improvement' mantra.

 

Does Stills make our roster better?

 

Very probably.

 

Make the move.

1 minute ago, Magox said:

It’s just about making your team better.   Does adding Stills make this is a better team?  I think it does.

 

Beat me to it.

 

Half of the problem is that we are so used to second guessing moves, we might not see the bit that is right in front of us.

 

While much of what has been discussed has validity, I would still say that when the decision gets made, 'does he make our roster better' will be very high on the list.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
1 minute ago, JoshAllenReceipts said:

 

 

Right...and Stills is a better WR than Davis.

 

Stills >>> Davis.

 

This is obvious. Why are we even arguing this?

I would hope so. He’s a vet and this is his 4th team now I think. He should be more seasoned than a rookie. Point was Stills is not that good that’s why he doesn’t stick places. Davis has as good of stats almost as Stills has ever had in his rookie year. 
I’m happy for the signing and emergency depth. He can be a useful deep threat or decoy but I wouldn’t be surprised if he didn’t see a playoff snap either even if we have injuries 

Posted
16 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

 

Umm...you don't watch games much do you?

Don’t get me wrong, I like Davis’s potential and he’s exceeded my expectations as a 4th round rookie this year but I think he benefits from the coverage the other guys draw. If the bills are left with him all of a sudden as WR2 I think the whole passing game will be negatively impacted. Maybe he becomes that in time but right now he’s most effective as WR 4 and the Bills are adding insurance to make sure it stays that way 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, Rc2catch said:

I would hope so. He’s a vet and this is his 4th team now I think. He should be more seasoned than a rookie. Point was Stills is not that good that’s why he doesn’t stick places. Davis has as good of stats almost as Stills has ever had in his rookie year. 
I’m happy for the signing and emergency depth. He can be a useful deep threat or decoy but I wouldn’t be surprised if he didn’t see a playoff snap either even if we have injuries 

 

 

Davis has his numbers because he's an afterthought for opposing defenses. He is left 1on1 the whole game. Nobody is worried about Davis. Davis puts up numbers simply because he plays so many snaps in an elite Passing Offense. Any WR left 1on1 as often as Davis in THIS particular offense is going to put up some numbers. It doesn't make him good, or impactful. 

1 minute ago, YoloinOhio said:

Don’t get me wrong, I like Davis’s potential and he’s exceeded my expectations as a 4th round rookie this year but I think he benefits from the coverage the other guys draw. If the bills are left with him all of a sudden as WR2 I think the whole passing game will be negatively impacted. Maybe he becomes that in time but right now he’s most effective as WR 4 and the Bills are adding insurance to make sure it stays that way 

 

 

+1

 

Perfectly stated.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, YoloinOhio said:

Don’t get me wrong, I like Davis’s potential and he’s exceeded my expectations as a 4th round rookie this year but I think he benefits from the coverage the other guys draw. If the bills are left with him all of a sudden as WR2 I think the whole passing game will be negatively impacted. Maybe he becomes that in time but right now he’s most effective as WR 4 and the Bills are adding insurance to make sure it stays that way 

 

I said this months ago when Brown went out.  Davis just doesn't do much on the outside.  All his damage is done when he can play from the slot and get lost with a crowd of people and end up wide open.  He's just not very shifty or a good route runner.

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted

Diggs, Brown, Stills (slot) 

 

is just as Dangerous as Diggs, Brown and Beasley in the slot. 
 

a different dangerous but still dangerous. 
 

you have the route runner Diggs. And now add a different element of Speed in the slot. I really like it. And think Stills will bring major value in the playoffs and future (if it is more than a 1 year deal). 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, JoshAllenReceipts said:

 

 

Davis has his numbers because he's an afterthought for opposing defenses. He is left 1on1 the whole game. Nobody is worried about Davis. Davis puts up numbers simply because he plays so many snaps in an elite Passing Offense. Any WR left 1on1 as often as Davis in THIS particular offense is going to put up some numbers. It doesn't make him good, or impactful. 

I never claimed either. He’s produced when called upon and exceeded expectations. You can’t ask much more from a 4th round rookie. Adding veteran depth is never a bad idea. 

×
×
  • Create New...