Malazan Posted January 4, 2021 Posted January 4, 2021 My gut says Beasely will play, but McKenzie sure made me feel better if he's out 3
Process Posted January 4, 2021 Posted January 4, 2021 (edited) McDermott giving zero information as usual. Not saying it's good/bad for him to do that, just annoying as a fan. At this point it's probably best for us to assume Beasley isn't coming back this year, and if he does it's a bonus. I feel a lot better with the Still signing. He can't replace Beasley but provides good depth and some insurance. This team is locked and loaded, with or without Beasley. Edited January 4, 2021 by Process
CNYfan Posted January 4, 2021 Posted January 4, 2021 My experience is that "week to week" = doubtful; and "day to day" = questionable. So, I think that Cole Beasley is "doubtful" for the Saturday Wildcard round against the Indianapolis Colts. 5 1
Straight Hucklebuck Posted January 4, 2021 Posted January 4, 2021 It sounds like he is trending towards being done for the year. If practice was tomorrow, he'd be a DNP.
Straight Hucklebuck Posted January 4, 2021 Posted January 4, 2021 50 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: We have to get the exact wording from McDermott. Was it “no update” and/or did he say week to week again?
Augie Posted January 4, 2021 Posted January 4, 2021 8 minutes ago, Straight Hucklebuck said: It sounds like he is trending towards being done for the year. If practice was tomorrow, he'd be a DNP. If we beat the Colts, I’ll be very interested to see about the next week. I think “done for the year” depends upon how long our year lasts, so I hope we stay alive long enough for him to come back. I’d LOVE to see him play in Tampa! I don’t know that they’d keep the roster spot open if they knew he was a no-go for the rest of the season.
YoloinOhio Posted January 4, 2021 Posted January 4, 2021 5 minutes ago, Straight Hucklebuck said: We have to get the exact wording from McDermott. Was it “no update” and/or did he say week to week again? He hesitated when asked if he was still week to week... then said yes I listened to the interview
BuffaloBaumer Posted January 4, 2021 Posted January 4, 2021 I think the fact that he said let's see what tomorrow brings means Beasley will be good to go for the next round. PROBABLY not ready for this weekend but guarantee those locks will be flowing at the ralph for the next round
Straight Hucklebuck Posted January 4, 2021 Posted January 4, 2021 41 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: He hesitated when asked if he was still week to week... then said yes I listened to the interview Yup I just listened to it. At least there was a follow up question this time. I have no idea what that hesitation was, he’s rehabbing, so it’s not IR or torn ligaments. He added that we’ll see what tomorrow brings, so not sure.
Warcodered Posted January 4, 2021 Posted January 4, 2021 44 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: He hesitated when asked if he was still week to week... then said yes I listened to the interview was it followed by this? 3
YoloinOhio Posted January 4, 2021 Posted January 4, 2021 8 minutes ago, Warcodered said: was it followed by this? Pretty much. He said nothing, with intention!
Straight Hucklebuck Posted January 4, 2021 Posted January 4, 2021 13 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: Pretty much. He said nothing, with intention! Is that your read on it? Beasley is progressing?
YoloinOhio Posted January 4, 2021 Posted January 4, 2021 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Straight Hucklebuck said: Is that your read on it? Beasley is progressing? IMO - “We will see what tomorrow brings” does not align with “week to week” . Then when asked if he was still w 2 w he hesitated... I think because he now could be day to day... but he didn’t want to give that away and no reason to. He doesn’t want the colts to know anything until he has to provide it. Right now they have to study film with Cole and without Cole Edited January 4, 2021 by YoloinOhio 1 1
Big Turk Posted January 4, 2021 Posted January 4, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said: He hesitated when asked if he was still week to week... then said yes I listened to the interview I mean we don't even know WTF the injury actually is after a week now...the lockdown on information leaks coming from OBD is actually pretty impressive. I am wondering if we needed this game if Beasley would have played and he simply just was allowed to rest because we didn't. Edited January 4, 2021 by Big Turk
hemma Posted January 4, 2021 Posted January 4, 2021 I’m 100% guessing he’ll be active, but won’t start. Emergency, pull-out-the-stops only. 2
CommonCents Posted January 4, 2021 Posted January 4, 2021 Is an 80 percent Cole better than a healthy Mckenzie? I doubt it. 1
NickelCity Posted January 4, 2021 Posted January 4, 2021 11 minutes ago, hemma said: I’m 100% guessing he’ll be active, but won’t start. Emergency, pull-out-the-stops only. This is my guess, too.
papazoid Posted January 4, 2021 Posted January 4, 2021 still week to week ....to me means more than 1...i say he is inactive for indy game 1
oldmanfan Posted January 5, 2021 Posted January 5, 2021 59 minutes ago, Straight Hucklebuck said: Is that your read on it? Beasley is progressing? Why are you so obsessed with this? McD does not have to match his words to your personal preferences. Beasley has an injury, I am sure everything is being done that can be, and we’ll see what happens. Meanwhile, without Beasley yesterday the starters hung 28 points in one half on one of the better defenses in the league playing for their playoff lives. 2
Straight Hucklebuck Posted January 5, 2021 Posted January 5, 2021 Just now, oldmanfan said: Why are you so obsessed with this? McD does not have to match his words to your personal preferences. Just wanted the Bills to be full strength for the Playoffs and think Beasley matters. Sorry I’m not being a fan in the way you want me to be. 1
Recommended Posts