BillStime Posted January 1, 2021 Posted January 1, 2021 2 hours ago, SoCal Deek said: Come on Tibs. There’s literally NOBODY who believes there was anything to the Russia collusion story. It’s over. It was a fantasy. Nobody’s even promoting the narrative anymore. Give it a rest.
Tiberius Posted January 1, 2021 Author Posted January 1, 2021 2 hours ago, SoCal Deek said: Come on Tibs. There’s literally NOBODY who believes there was anything to the Russia collusion story. It’s over. It was a fantasy. Nobody’s even promoting the narrative anymore. Give it a rest. Nothing happened between and with Trump and Putin? Seriously? Wow. What about all the evidence I’ve told you about before? 1
SoCal Deek Posted January 1, 2021 Posted January 1, 2021 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: Nothing happened between and with Trump and Putin? Seriously? Wow. What about all the evidence I’ve told you about before? You were played Dude. And you bought into all of it. 1
Tiberius Posted January 1, 2021 Author Posted January 1, 2021 27 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: You were played Dude. And you bought into all of it. But what about all the evidence I presented to you? Just pretend it’s not true? You dont like facts, huh?
Tiberius Posted January 2, 2021 Author Posted January 2, 2021 2 minutes ago, Wacka said: Tibs, stop talking about yourself. Happy new year Wacka!
SoCal Deek Posted January 2, 2021 Posted January 2, 2021 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: But what about all the evidence I presented to you? Just pretend it’s not true? You dont like facts, huh? You are literally the only person in the world who gives a rats arse about that entirely fabricated story, but it’s clearly your happy place so who am I to break your heart?
Tiberius Posted January 2, 2021 Author Posted January 2, 2021 1 minute ago, SoCal Deek said: You are literally the only person in the world who gives a rats arse about that entirely fabricated story, but it’s clearly your happy place so who am I to break your heart? Oh no, the evidence wasn’t fabricated. Who are you saying made up the evidence?
SoCal Deek Posted January 2, 2021 Posted January 2, 2021 Just now, Tiberius said: Oh no, the evidence wasn’t fabricated. Who are you saying made up the evidence? Mr Mueller? Is that you? 😂😂😂😂 1
Tiberius Posted January 2, 2021 Author Posted January 2, 2021 26 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: Mr Mueller? Is that you? 😂😂😂😂 Since you are anti-law enforcement, what about all the evidence I showed you that came from other sources?
49er Fan Posted January 2, 2021 Posted January 2, 2021 12 hours ago, SoCal Deek said: You are literally the only person in the world who gives a rats arse about that entirely fabricated story, but it’s clearly your happy place so who am I to break your heart? Beautiful use of “literally” but completely wrong. Check out Lawfare’s “The Report” podcast instead of following Q, OANN and Newsmax. https://shows.acast.com/the-report
SoCal Deek Posted January 2, 2021 Posted January 2, 2021 3 minutes ago, 49er Fan said: Beautiful use of “literally” but completely wrong. Check out Lawfare’s “The Report” podcast instead of following Q, OANN and Newsmax. https://shows.acast.com/the-report First of all, I’ve never once listened to any of the sources you quote. Second, you can find anyone to say just about anything in this world so if you want believe in some silly conspiracy about Donald Trump and Russia, I’m not going to stop you. But...that doesn’t mean I’m not going laugh hysterically while you do it. (You were lied to by people in power that knew the truth but lied anyway.)
Tiberius Posted January 2, 2021 Author Posted January 2, 2021 10 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: First of all, I’ve never once listened to any of the sources you quote. Second, you can find anyone to say just about anything in this world so if you want believe in some silly conspiracy about Donald Trump and Russia, I’m not going to stop you. But...that doesn’t mean I’m not going laugh hysterically while you do it. (You were lied to by people in power that knew the truth but lied anyway.) Silly, but what about the evidence I’ve shown you again and again? You just want to live fact free and believe whatever feels good to you
SoCal Deek Posted January 2, 2021 Posted January 2, 2021 8 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Silly, but what about the evidence I’ve shown you again and again? You just want to live fact free and believe whatever feels good to you You seem truly concerned with my opinion on this topic. I appreciate that. So given all that transpired I take it you believe Mueller was also a Russian agent?
Tiberius Posted January 2, 2021 Author Posted January 2, 2021 2 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: You seem truly concerned with my opinion on this topic. I appreciate that. So given all that transpired I take it you believe Mueller was also a Russian agent? No, he exposed collusion between Trump campaign and Russia
SoCal Deek Posted January 2, 2021 Posted January 2, 2021 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said: No, he exposed collusion between Trump campaign and Russia Tibs, I’m not going to stop you from believing what you believe. It’s clearly your happy place. Knock yourself out.
Tiberius Posted January 2, 2021 Author Posted January 2, 2021 Judge dismisses Gohmert’s suit seeking to alter formal count of Biden’s electoral college votes A federal judge ruled that Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Tex.) lacked the legal standing to challenge the process for counting electoral college votes. Gohmert had claimed Vice President Pence had the power to determine which votes should be counted. By Devlin Barrett 1 minute ago, SoCal Deek said: Tibs, I’m not going to stop you from believing what you believe. It’s clearly your happy place. Knock yourself out. That’s fine, but if you call it a hoax, I’ll just keep asking why you ignore the evidence, that’s all.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted January 2, 2021 Posted January 2, 2021 3 minutes ago, Tiberius said: No, he exposed collusion between Trump campaign and Russia The only thing that came out of his report was that the govt will go to extraordinary lengths to create a narrative to crush you and everyone around you if you go against the grain. In fact, they don’t even have to be particularly good at it because folks like Tibsy will believe what they say in spite of a horrendous performance by a bureaucrat like Mueller. He looked like a college kid totally unprepared to talk about a term paper he swiped off the internet.
Tiberius Posted January 2, 2021 Author Posted January 2, 2021 3 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: The only thing that came out of his report was that the govt will go to extraordinary lengths to create a narrative to crush you and everyone around you if you go against the grain. In fact, they don’t even have to be particularly good at it because folks like Tibsy will believe what they say in spite of a horrendous performance by a bureaucrat like Mueller. He looked like a college kid totally unprepared to talk about a term paper he swiped off the internet. No, it showed that collusion is not a crime. You can literally work with a foreign evil doer and that isn’t a crime. Trumps team obviously got help from Russia, but they didn’t break any laws getting help from the murderous dictator. Pretend it it didn’t happen all you want, but it did
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted January 2, 2021 Posted January 2, 2021 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: No, it showed that collusion is not a crime. You can literally work with a foreign evil doer and that isn’t a crime. Trumps team obviously got help from Russia, but they didn’t break any laws getting help from the murderous dictator. Pretend it it didn’t happen all you want, but it did I try to understand this perspective, I really do. I just don’t get it. Liberals constantly bash on law enforcement for overreach and over-aggressive tactics. It doesn’t seem to matter that there are millions and millions of interactions between law enforcement and ordinary citizens everyday that are civil, normal and in many cases, heroic. Yet here you are praising a massive, no holds barred, unlimited and unfettered investigation into something that—even buying your narrative—-isn’t a crime. It was never about a crime, heck our friend @Deranged Rhino and others called that out nearly a half-century ago now. This was always about nothing, with an eye toward creating something. “Collusion” got you and yours all amped up and when that faded, they screamed “obstruction” because that was the only outcome that resulted in any substantive penalty. Along the way they used fear, the frightening power of the US government, and the propaganda arm of the National media to keep folks like you on the edge of your seat. In other words, they told you what to think in spite of our legal system, you obliged without question, and when it all fell apart with a confused old man (there’s a trend in Dem leadership) losing track of what was said and done, they told you again to just be OUTRAGED that ‘collusion’ was never a crime. You don’t have to oblige. What concerns me is how quickly you all fall in line in defending special counsel type overreach v say, shedding tears over a Jacob Blake type incident.
Recommended Posts