Scenario where Bills may want to intentionally lose week 17

[BuffaloBillies]

No. Just win. Keep the good juices flowing

[HappyDays]

1 minute ago, Straight Hucklebuck said:

You and I agree on this.

 

The Ravens are the last team I want to play.

 

Miami > Colts > Browns > Tennessee > Baltimore 

 

I would actually rank it like this:

 

Miami > Colts > Browns > Ravens > Titans

 

Titans are the last team I want in the wildcard round. Derrick Henry scares me and their passing offense is efficient.

[SageAgainstTheMachine]

1 minute ago, BuffaloBillies said:

No. Just win. Keep the good juices flowing

 

I love how the team is a steaming locomotive right now and so many of the fans seem content with just scoring the easiest possible wildcard matchup and winning one game.

[Buffalo03]

1 minute ago, SageAgainstTheMachine said:

 

I love how the team is a steaming locomotive right now and so many of the fans seem content with just scoring the easiest possible wildcard matchup and winning one game.

Not winning just one game. You're completely missing the point 

[Mango]

Winning games> losing games 99.9% of the time. Resting starters week 17 is sometimes preferable to keep starters fresh/injury free. 
 

The biggest plus in this scenario is that the Dolphins would have to open their entire bag of tricks and put everything they have on film and the Bills could sit back and just hit record on the camera. 
 

Also unsure if ever allowing your opponent to beat you in week one ever actually helps you beat them in week two. 
 

It is a weird situation either way. If I am playing the same team twice in a row, I think I’d want to squash their hope and dreams to the point that their families are embarrassed  in game 1. 

[HappyDays]

1 minute ago, SageAgainstTheMachine said:

 

I love how the team is a steaming locomotive right now and so many of the fans seem content with just scoring the easiest possible wildcard matchup and winning one game.

 

I'll take any advantage I get. There is literally no reason to play the starters in week 17 if we have the #2 seed clinched. The Chiefs aren't worried about losing momentum because their starters get a week off. The top teams do it all the time.

[SageAgainstTheMachine]

1 minute ago, HappyDays said:

 

I'll take any advantage I get. There is literally no reason to play the starters in week 17 if we have the #2 seed clinched. The Chiefs aren't worried about losing momentum because their starters get a week off. The top teams do it all the time.

 

I completely agree with resting the starters but not with your premise of intentionally losing.  I'd hope the backups beat them soundly.  

[BuffaloBillies]

2 minutes ago, Buffalo03 said:

Not winning just one game. You're completely missing the point 

 

No.  You're missing the point. Fear no one. We're better.

KC game would be an epic battle, but no fear against anyone else, especially at home. 

[Buffalo03]

Just now, BuffaloBillies said:

 

No.  You're missing the point. Fear no one. We're better.

KC game would be an epic battle, but no fear against anyone else, especially at home. 

We aren't looking to win just one game. That's what was said. That's missing the point. We want the easiest matchup week 1 and give us even more momentum going into week 2 against a team that we are more evenly matched with. I feel good about this team beating anyone except the Ravens and the Titans. I'd rather even play the Chiefs right away than play either one of those two teams. I want no part of Lamar or Derrick Henry in the opening round of the playoffs. 

[SageAgainstTheMachine]

6 minutes ago, Buffalo03 said:

Not winning just one game. You're completely missing the point 

 

I don't think I am.  I'd like an easier opponent in the first round but not at the cost of turtling in a game because we're afraid of a bubble team.

[Buffalo03]

Just now, SageAgainstTheMachine said:

 

I don't think I am.  I'd like an easier opponent in the first round but not at the cost of turtling in a game because we're afraid of a bubble team.

It's a meaningless game with backups. Why would you care?

[BringBackFlutie]

It doesn't matter.  We're going to hang 40 on the Dolphins.

 

This isn't a conversation.

[HappyDays]

9 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

I’m actually rooting for the Steelers next week so we don’t need to worry about this scenario.... I think we get the 2 seed either way.

 

I can see the logic there. I'll just root for the Titans to win out and then we don't have to worry about it no matter what.

[TroutDog]

This Bills team can beat beat anyone, anywhere when playing the way they have the last many weeks. Win, baby...just win!

Edited December 22, 2020 by TroutDog

[BuffaloBillies]

2 minutes ago, Buffalo03 said:

We aren't looking to win just one game. That's what was said. That's missing the point. We want the easiest matchup week 1 and give us even more momentum going into week 2 against a team that we are more evenly matched with. I feel good about this team beating anyone except the Ravens and the Titans. I'd rather even play the Chiefs right away than play either one of those two teams. I want no part of Lamar or Derrick Henry in the opening round of the playoffs. 

 

I hear you, friend. But give me 2 home (against anyone) then to KC. I like our chances. Go Bills. 

[SageAgainstTheMachine]

Just now, Buffalo03 said:

It's a meaningless game with backups. Why would you care?

 

There's no such thing as a meaningless game where you play the same opponent the next week.  Handing over a mental advantage could be drinking poison.  I already acknowledged that I'm fine with playing the backups in this scenario but purely because of the injury concerns.  Do you really expect McD to address the team and tell them to intentionally lose?  He wouldn't be able to look at them after.  To be clear if you have a desperate team of starters vs a team of backups actively trying to lose in an NFL game the score would be something like 55-3.  That's not the team morale I want heading into the playoffs.  Give me a swaggering Bills squad against the Ravens over a simpering one against the Dolphins trying to pick their dignity back up off the floor.  

[HappyDays]

8 minutes ago, Buffalo03 said:

I feel good about this team beating anyone except the Ravens and the Titans.

 

Eh the Ravens don't really scare me. I'd put them even with Cleveland as far as ranking teams I'd like to play in the wildcard round. We already know McDermott can slow Lamar Jackson down even in the middle of an MVP season and now we have an offense that can score points. Jackson has choked in two straight playoff appearances. I might actually prefer them to the Browns right now. Only team I really don't want to face in the wildcard is Tennessee. Outside of KC they're my least favorite matchup for the Bills. 

[Figster]

16 minutes ago, SageAgainstTheMachine said:

 

I completely agree with resting the starters but not with your premise of intentionally losing.  I'd hope the backups beat them soundly.  

Main thing is create a bye for the starters

[Big Blitz]

If we secure the 2 seed this week you're dam right McD is using week 17 as a de facto bye for Josh, Diggs, Brown, Beasley, Milano, Tre, Edmunds, both Poyer and Hyde, and Morse.  

 

150% 

Edited December 22, 2020 by Big Blitz

[HappyDays]

4 minutes ago, SageAgainstTheMachine said:

Do you really expect McD to address the team and tell them to intentionally lose?  He wouldn't be able to look at them after. 

 

You're overstating my point. I'm not saying to literally throw the game. If Jake Fromm throwing to Gabe Davis and Isaiah McKenzie somehow beats the Dolphins, God bless them. I consider starting the backups effectively the same thing as intentionally losing. If the Dolphins somehow lose in that scenario I'll just shrug my shoulders and laugh at them.

Edited December 22, 2020 by HappyDays