Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, PrimeTime101 said:

That's a lot of if's ands and buts.  sorry I don't see us ever locking the second seed. and #1 seed? we have 0 chance at #1 seed. KC is up by 2 games winning a tie breaker...  #2 seed is possible but unlikely. and the titans? they are one game behind but win a tie breaker..  that may be the only reason we push the starters out the last game

What? It's unlikely that either the Browns or the Colts beat the Steelers? They lose 1 game and the #2 seed can be ours. 

 

Right now the NY Times has our chance at the #2 seed at 42%. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

I kinda dont want the 2 Seed if Ravens are the 7 seed... id be willing to let Miami win week 17 and rest our starters just so Ravens dont sneak into our 1st round game.

Edited by Kmart128
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

It all depends on how much value the Bills coaching staff places on:

a)  Being healthy and rested for the playoffs

b)  Having the chance at an extra home game in the divisional round

c)  Which opponent they are going to play in the wild card round

 

What happens if the Bills go into Week 17, knowing that a win earns them a matchup against the Titans?  

And by playing their backups (and ultimately losing), they will get a rematch against the Dolphins in the wild card round.

 

If I'm Sean McDermott in this situation, I'm going to start Matt Barkley and use Week 17 as scouting film for the next week.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

We keep playing to win, every week. A week of rest does not do a team hitting their stride well. A reminder that we were 4-0 heading into Tennessee. And look what those extra days did for us. This team is on fire and they need to keep the train a rolling. Choo Choo Baby. Choo Choo. 

 

 

Edited by The Gravytrain
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Motorin' said:

What? It's unlikely that either the Browns or the Colts beat the Steelers? They lose 1 game and the #2 seed can be ours. 

 

Right now the NY Times has our chance at the #2 seed at 42%. 

i agree go reread my post lol

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, The Red King said:

So, I took a look at the standings to see where we could be week 17 and everything from the 1 to 4 seed are in play.  I wondered, is there any way we could be locked in by week 17 and rest our starters?  There's only one, and it's a longshot to say the least.

 

Buffalo will be locked in as the second seed by week 17 *if*...

 

*Buffalo beats New England

*Pitt loses tonight and next week.

*The Titans lose next week

 

If all that happens, Buffalo goes into week 17 a game ahead of Pitt and at least a game ahead of Indy and holds tie-breakers with both.  The Titans have the tie-breaker, but would be two games back.  Even if Cleveland wins to move into a tie for the division, they would also be a game behind the Bills and the Bills also hold the tie-breaker over them.  They would be assured no worse then #2, but Pitt's two losses would lock Buffalo out of #1.

 

So there ya go, only one path to Buffalo's week 17 matchup being meaningless to them, and that relies on four games playing out a certain way.  I don't see us getting to rest our starters.

The one seed is over. Its only spots 2-4

Edited by Protocal69
Posted
11 minutes ago, PrimeTime101 said:

i agree go reread my post lol

 

You said the 2 seed is unlikely and the Steelers hold the tie breaker. We hold the tie breakers, and the #2 seed is almost a coin flip at this point percentage wise. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, CaptnCoke11 said:

Bengals aren’t beating Pittsburgh lol.  Colts or Browns sure but not Cincinnati 


amazing to me how everyone has written off the Steelers. Just a few weeks ago, they were the most complete team in football and were thinking about an undefeated season.

 

I wouldn’t count those guys out. Lot of vets, good coaching, etc. Teams like that can go into a mini slump and easily turn things around. I actually think their main problem is offensive playcalling— which is correctible. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Motorin' said:

 

You said the 2 seed is unlikely and the Steelers hold the tie breaker. We hold the tie breakers, and the #2 seed is almost a coin flip at this point percentage wise. 

yea i wrote that wrong my bad lol

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

steelers are going to lose week 16 & 17.  bills will be better off playing backups/throwing the week 17 game.  with a win over new england and those steelers losses this gives us the 2 seed and a wild card game against miami

Edited by ogham26
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, TH3 said:

They way I see it...NOT being 4 seed means no chance of being at Chiefs Divisional weekend...being 2 Seed means 2 home games

Correct me if I'm wrong weren't we playing at home when Kansas City kicked our butt?

Edited by ALLEN1QB
Posted (edited)

I hope the team is only concerned about winning the Super Bowl. This is a team that should fear absolutely no team in the league at this point. They should have the attitude of welcoming a rematch with the Chiefs because you have to knock the crown off the king to be the king. 

 

The Bills already have a home game in round 1. They don't care who they play. They plan to win and can beat any team in the playoffs. 

 

The team should rest whatever starters needed (maybe all of them!), if it means being healthier and better prepared to march through the playoffs. That week is nothing more than a glorified pre-season game to a confident team. 

 

The Bills need to win 4 games in a row once the season is over. That's the only metric anyone should be thinking about. Our boy blue has it right:

 

“This hat’s fine and dandy. This hat and shirt’s fine and dandy. I want the one that says, f—ing Super Bowl Champion!”
     —Buffalo quarterback Josh Allen, in the locker room, to his teammates, after the Bills won their first AFC East championship in 25 years Saturday in Denver.

 

P.S. That's the quote on the tee shirt they should be selling after the division win!

Edited by BisonMan
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
3 hours ago, CaptnCoke11 said:

Bengals aren’t beating Pittsburgh lol.  Colts or Browns sure but not Cincinnati 

 

Probably, but we certainly would have said the same about the Jets yesterday against the Rams.

One other thing - regardless of whether Pittsburgh gets the 2 seed or not, how likely are they to win their first game?  I feel like as long as we get the #3 seed or higher there's still a pretty good chance we get 2 home playoff games (or even 3 if Baltimore keeps playing like they are and pick off KC.)

Posted
1 hour ago, Kmart128 said:

I kinda dont want the 2 Seed if Ravens are the 7 seed... id be willing to let Miami win week 17 and rest our starters just so Ravens dont sneak into our 1st round game.

I agree...the 2 seed will play the 7 seed.  If the Ravens continue to hit their stride and are the 7 seed, they will beat Pittsburgh.  So, if we're the 3 seed and win the first round, we will get another home game in the second round as well.  Ravens being the 7 seed would play @ KC in the second round.  

As of now, I like the 3 seed!

Posted
20 minutes ago, BisonMan said:

I hope the team is only concerned about winning the Super Bowl. This is a team that should fear absolutely no team in the league at this point. They should have the attitude of welcoming a rematch with the Chiefs because you have to knock the crown off the king to be the king. 

 

The Bills already have a home game in round 1. They don't care who they play. They plan to win and can beat any team in the playoffs. 

 

The team should rest whatever starters needed (maybe all of them!), if it means being healthier and better prepared to march through the playoffs. That week is nothing more than a glorified pre-season game to a confident team. 

 

The Bills need to win 4 games in a row once the season is over. That's the only metric anyone should be thinking about. Our boy blue has it right:

 

“This hat’s fine and dandy. This hat and shirt’s fine and dandy. I want the one that says, f—ing Super Bowl Champion!”
     —Buffalo quarterback Josh Allen, in the locker room, to his teammates, after the Bills won their first AFC East championship in 25 years Saturday in Denver.

 

P.S. That's the quote on the tee shirt they should be selling after the division win!

Could you imagine the fan freakout if Allen started week17 and got hurt for the rest of the year?

 

People are way to hung up on seeds 2-4. I gotta say I love it though. Such a beautiful and refreshing problem to have..

Posted

I would rest White, Edmunds, Milano, Dawkins, Williams, Feliciano, Morse, and our three WRs.  I would play Allen sparingly, a few handoffs.

 

1st seed is out of reach now, so there is no bye week coming our way.

Many scenarios have us re-playing the Dolphins week 1, if we lose to them week 17.

Many scenarios have us playing the Ravens week1, if we beat the Dolphins week 17.

IMO, the Ravens are playing better ball right now.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Kmart128 said:

I kinda dont want the 2 Seed if Ravens are the 7 seed... id be willing to let Miami win week 17 and rest our starters just so Ravens dont sneak into our 1st round game.


I just realized this is a likely situation. Ravens will probably win out since they’re playing NYG and bengals. If Miami wins next week against Vegas, we should consider playing backups and not showing our hand playbook-wise. Then if they win we play them in WC with our starters and full playbook instead of Ravens. 
 

Miami would show tendencies week 17 because they need the game. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
3 hours ago, loveorhatembillsfan4life said:

Pitt has a real chance of losing the next two after tonight. . I think as as long as we have a chance to play for 2 seed we do. 


As long as they can avoid the 4 seed they should do it. Last thing they want is KC in the division round.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, MDH said:


As long as they can avoid the 4 seed they should do it. Last thing they want is KC in the division round.

 

That might be the best time to get them. They will be coming off the bye so they might have some rust to their game.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 hours ago, The Red King said:

So, I took a look at the standings to see where we could be week 17 and everything from the 1 to 4 seed are in play.  I wondered, is there any way we could be locked in by week 17 and rest our starters?  There's only one, and it's a longshot to say the least.

 

Buffalo will be locked in as the second seed by week 17 *if*...

 

*Buffalo beats New England

*Pitt loses tonight and next week.

*The Titans lose next week

 

If all that happens, Buffalo goes into week 17 a game ahead of Pitt and at least a game ahead of Indy and holds tie-breakers with both.  The Titans have the tie-breaker, but would be two games back.  Even if Cleveland wins to move into a tie for the division, they would also be a game behind the Bills and the Bills also hold the tie-breaker over them.  They would be assured no worse then #2, but Pitt's two losses would lock Buffalo out of #1.

 

So there ya go, only one path to Buffalo's week 17 matchup being meaningless to them, and that relies on four games playing out a certain way.  I don't see us getting to rest our starters.

Pittsburgh is not losing tonight, 100%.

/end thread

×
×
  • Create New...