custcarcen Posted December 10, 2020 Posted December 10, 2020 PFF QB rankings on NFL.com for games played week 13: Rodgers Stafford Mahomes Tannehill Mayfield Josh Allen 18
The Wiz Posted December 10, 2020 Posted December 10, 2020 He completed too many hard passes. That's a bad thing. 1 2
IgotBILLStopay Posted December 10, 2020 Posted December 10, 2020 (edited) This is the more egregious tweet How can Allen be fading after a week in which he threw 375 yards, 4 TDs with a 139+ passer rating (was AFC Offensive Player of the Week) and his MVP odds went from 34 - 1 to 13 - 1 (which is 3rd best)? Edited December 10, 2020 by IgotBILLStopay 4
Warcodered Posted December 10, 2020 Posted December 10, 2020 (edited) 5 minutes ago, The Wiz said: He completed too many hard passes. That's a bad thing. Probably threaded the needle too much, PFF would prefer he avoid throwing at the needle all together. Edited December 10, 2020 by Warcodered
DCbillsfan Posted December 10, 2020 Posted December 10, 2020 PFF can rank him 32 for all I care. 32 - 40, 375, 4 TDs, and 34 - 24 good guys. That's what matters. What a joke. 2
HansLanda Posted December 10, 2020 Posted December 10, 2020 a faux fumble that was on Moss must have negated all the passes and TD's
RichRiderBills Posted December 10, 2020 Posted December 10, 2020 I'm just not even sure where Stafford would even have him. Josh Allen leads him in everything....what am I missing. Do they ever explain the metric? 1
NoSaint Posted December 10, 2020 Posted December 10, 2020 8 minutes ago, Warcodered said: Tannehill? He did have 389 yards and a TD so it’s not insane Stanford had 400+ Baker was 338 and 4tda rodgers and mahomes both look like they had good games i surely didn’t see all 6 performances but this isn’t an egregious snub even if he deserves to be a few higher. He’s in the elite grouping from the week.
Don Otreply Posted December 10, 2020 Posted December 10, 2020 Pff is as useful as a sack full of sphincter muscles, 1
Warcodered Posted December 10, 2020 Posted December 10, 2020 1 minute ago, NoSaint said: He did have 389 yards and a TD so it’s not insane Stanford had 400+ Baker was 338 and 4tda rodgers and mahomes both look like they had good games i surely didn’t see all 6 performances but this isn’t an egregious snub even if he deserves to be a few higher. He’s in the elite grouping from the week. Oh right Cleveland almost let the Titans garbage time it back into the game.
GoBills808 Posted December 10, 2020 Posted December 10, 2020 2 minutes ago, NoSaint said: He did have 389 yards and a TD so it’s not insane Stanford had 400+ Baker was 338 and 4tda rodgers and mahomes both look like they had good games i surely didn’t see all 6 performances but this isn’t an egregious snub even if he deserves to be a few higher. He’s in the elite grouping from the week. Tannehill and the Titans got blown tf out and were playing garbage time the whole second half 2
Bferra13 Posted December 10, 2020 Posted December 10, 2020 3 minutes ago, Warcodered said: Oh right Cleveland almost let the Titans garbage time it back into the game. Yup, and one of those plays was a late Mayfield fumble.
Warcodered Posted December 10, 2020 Posted December 10, 2020 1 minute ago, Bferra13 said: Yup, and one of those plays was a late Mayfield fumble. So wait Mayfield is ahead of Allen despite both fumbling and throwing an INT?
RiotAct Posted December 10, 2020 Posted December 10, 2020 surprised they don’t have Mullens ahead of him, too. 2 1
The Wiz Posted December 10, 2020 Posted December 10, 2020 8 minutes ago, RichRiderBills said: I'm just not even sure where Stafford would even have him. Josh Allen leads him in everything....what am I missing. Do they ever explain the metric? They have a 300+ page manual on how they rank players and it is triple checked by the same people every week that have a bias.
Recommended Posts