2003 Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 Give this guy a chance. I think this pick makes sense. Nate had major problems returning kicks last year. By the end of the season all you negative idiots will be kissing this guys ass!!!http://www.nfl.com/partners/aol?http://www.../parrish_roscoe
CoachChuckDickerson Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 Give this guy a chance. I think this pick makes sense. Nate had major problems returning kicks last year. By the end of the season all you negative idiots will be kissing this guys ass!!!http://www.nfl.com/partners/aol?http://www.../parrish_roscoe 314885[/snapback] Yeah. This isn't a place to voice your opinion or anything like that. Everyone shut up!!!
TSNBDSC Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 Give this guy a chance. I think this pick makes sense. Nate had major problems returning kicks last year. By the end of the season all you negative idiots will be kissing this guys ass!!!http://www.nfl.com/partners/aol?http://www.../parrish_roscoe 314885[/snapback] ... there just having some "sticker shock" ! ...
RJsackedagain Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 Dude, I don't think we are the ones making you puke ..... it's the pick!
mead107 Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 Dude, I don't think we are the ones making you puke ..... it's the pick! 315147[/snapback] well said
MrLocke Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 Lets just wait to see him play before we judge him. People who have been arguing that CB is a need because Nate Clements is a free agent next year must also admit receiver is a need because Eric Moulds could just as easily be a free agent due to his cap number.
Chalkie Gerzowski Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 I like the idea of 3 (possible) viable options in the passing game. We have 2 pretty much.....also could/should kick Josh Reed to the curb.
RJsackedagain Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 Lets just wait to see him play before we judge him. People who have been arguing that CB is a need because Nate Clements is a free agent next year must also admit receiver is a need because Eric Moulds could just as easily be a free agent due to his cap number. 315155[/snapback] I'm not worrying about Nate leaving, I've seen the OL play the past few years and they stink ---- that's where my concern happens to be!!
kasper13 Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 Please, go ahead and puke. The pick sucked. Not trading TH sucked. Out of the last three day one drafts for the Bills, this one was by far the worst. This rivals 2000 so far.
MrLocke Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 I'm not worrying about Nate leaving, I've seen the OL play the past few years and they stink ---- that's where my concern happens to be!! 315166[/snapback] I was not neccesarily refering to you. I just reffering to the people around here who have been clamouring for a cornerback.
Ralonzo Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 This pick would be a called a reach, but it didn't come at a position of need. I think Coach April needs 4 dangerous return men. Then on kickoffs and punts, we just line up Clements, F. Smith, Parrish, and McGee back there, and teams will be so scared they'll just squib kick it, or run it into the line on 4th and 14.
Recommended Posts