MikeInRoch Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 ...that so many people posting here know *SO* much more than TD does. Until you see this kid on the field, STFU.
EndZoneCrew Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 Amen.......I would like to read about the positives here.....can't we just get a thread with all of the "Negativists" in one post so I can avoid that one instead of seeing them sprinkled in EVERY FREAKIN THREAD!!!!!
VABills Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 Yeah after all we have made the playoffs every year, and won a couple of Super Bowls since he has been here. Hello, I like TD, and think he is doing okay overall, but he has really screwed the pooch on several occassions.
EndZoneCrew Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 Yeah after all we have made the playoffs every year, and won a couple of Super Bowls since he has been here. Hello, I like TD, and think he is doing okay overall, but he has really screwed the pooch on several occassions. 314859[/snapback] well if it is SOOOOO bad and hard to take do us a favor and post on a Fin or Pats board!
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 well if it is SOOOOO bad and hard to take do us a favor and post on a Fin or Pats board! 314866[/snapback] OOOOOR, you could treat a long-time poster with respect instead of being a windbag.
zonabb Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 At least those guys are dependable up to 40 yds. Then sign a kick off specialist. We CANNOT go into this season with Lindell as our kicker. Who agrees with me on that point? Who replaces him is debateable. . . that he needs to be replaced isn't! 314637[/snapback] I agree, everyone here is a GM waiting for the call to the big leagues. But, with this pick, you have to ask yourself, how does this improve a 9-7 team on the verge of the playoffs that had needs at OL. And I would go so far as to say CB with the impending departure of NC. I think that this pick means more about Moulds than Reed. EM's number is high next year and if Evens continues to develop into a #1, Moulds could be gone. That being said, EM is under contract beyond 05, making a CB more of a need as a backup. But, I'm not a GM, not a scout nor a coach. I have no idea if the CB value, or even OL, were 2nd round. So that's why, although I question, I don't act like I know more than TD.
Frez Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 ...that so many people posting here know *SO* much more than TD does. Until you see this kid on the field, STFU. 314843[/snapback] Isn't it funny!
IndyMark Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 ...that so many people posting here know *SO* much more than TD does. Until you see this kid on the field, STFU. 314843[/snapback] Well said...I especially like the "fans" here who are now saying "I waited 8 hours for that!". As if the Bills owe them, or anyone an exciting draft. Geez get a life and move on until you see the guy play. That said, why does "Avion Black" and "Rodney Bellinger" sound familiar???
EndZoneCrew Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 OOOOOR, you could treat a long-time poster with respect instead of being a windbag. 314871[/snapback] Give me a break...a little ball busting is being a windbag?????.....Get off your high horse....I forgot we have to kiss the feet of every longtime poster on here...what a joke!
Thailog80 Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 Come on guys a 5'8 168 lb WR pick deserves a few jabs. Red zone threat....we'll see.
cåblelady Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 Well said...I especially like the "fans" here who are now saying "I waited 8 hours for that!". 314884[/snapback] I like you, too.
EndZoneCrew Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 Come on guys a 5'8 168 lb WR pick deserves a few jabs. Red zone threat....we'll see. 314898[/snapback] We're just having a little fun here.....the jury will be out until he straps on his pads but I think he was drafted more for his return ability on punts, so when Clements walks after next year we have someone to fill in
cåblelady Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 Touche'.....I think. 314917[/snapback] I'm just a bit surprised at our 1st pick.....and it took a long time getting to #55. It's been a long day. I'm just used to a little more excitment like the McGahee, Losman and Evans picks....(and I'm a little bummed about losing Nugent to the Jets and the fact that we're not going to get the Arizona trade for Travis). Maybe I just need a group hug.
stuckincincy Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 Maybe I just need a group hug. 314946[/snapback] That guy down there hugging your shins is named Roscoe.
cåblelady Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 That guy down there hugging your shins is named Roscoe. 315019[/snapback]
RJsackedagain Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 ...that so many people posting here know *SO* much more than TD does. Until you see this kid on the field, STFU. 314843[/snapback] Hey Modrak is that you?? ..... TD can be wrong sometimes to you know: Gregg Williams is the prime example. When a team has pressing needs on the OL and also has needs at TE, DL, DB and LB a reciver is not a high priority
todd Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 well if it is SOOOOO bad and hard to take do us a favor and post on a Fin or Pats board! 314866[/snapback] Please. Dissent is OK. Nobody here REALLY knows enough to scout players, but choosing a small WR with the second pick is certainly controversial.
SDS Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 I rarely criticize any move until I see the full plan and the players play. With that said, how many *small* players ever make it in the NFL? They are a dime a dozen in college, yet the ones that make it are the exceptions that prove the rule. Corey Moore was an OUTSTANDING college football player, but was an NFL bust. The landscape is littered with them. There is ample reason to be pessimistic about this guy's prospective career.
EndZoneCrew Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 Hey Modrak is that you?? ..... TD can be wrong sometimes to you know: Gregg Williams is the prime example.When a team has pressing needs on the OL and also has needs at TE, DL, DB and LB a reciver is not a high priority 315050[/snapback] Isn't that the same post you made when we drafted Willis M.? We needed other players back then as well......and that seems to be working ok!
Recommended Posts