cåblelady Posted April 24, 2005 Share Posted April 24, 2005 ........a short WR, no less. What am I not seeing here ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EndZoneCrew Posted April 24, 2005 Share Posted April 24, 2005 The Big Picture Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffaloed in Pa Posted April 24, 2005 Share Posted April 24, 2005 ........a short WR, no less. What am I not seeing here ? 314826[/snapback] not much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cåblelady Posted April 24, 2005 Author Share Posted April 24, 2005 The Big Picture 314828[/snapback] Maybe I'll see it better from The End Zone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ch19079 Posted April 24, 2005 Share Posted April 24, 2005 i feel the same way. a short, 165 lbs WR. who didnt start till his last year in college. hes a good punt returner. good, thats nice, but you dont draft a punt returner in the 2nd. and DEFINATLY not when your first pick is #55.!!!!! most people say hes not a starting WR. a slot reciever at best... what about OT?? OG??? TE??? DT??? you can say edwards can fill ill at DT. (hawthorn was there) you can say we can find a OG in our roster somewhere. but what abotu OT?? arizona isnt gunna want henry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSNBDSC Posted April 24, 2005 Share Posted April 24, 2005 ... Willis likes him ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanInSouthBuffalo Posted April 24, 2005 Share Posted April 24, 2005 Something else from the press conference from Tom Modrak. He basically said he can play RIGHT NOW, in the Bills opinion of course. They didn't feel there were too many lineman that they felt the same about. The Sporting News draft guide compares him to Santana Moss. The Bills haven't had too many recievers that can blow the opponents' doors off. Now the Bills might have two in Parrish and Evans. The pick feels a little weird, but past Evans and Moulds I think our receivers are VERY weak. We might have a trio that COULD compete with Indy's---Harrison--Stokely---Wayne. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EndZoneCrew Posted April 24, 2005 Share Posted April 24, 2005 Maybe I'll see it better from The End Zone. 314861[/snapback] ...maybe....we do have a great view!.....of the Jills.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cåblelady Posted April 24, 2005 Author Share Posted April 24, 2005 Something else from the press conference from Tom Modrak. He basically said he can play RIGHT NOW, in the Bills opinion of course. They didn't feel there were too many lineman that they felt the same about.The Sporting News draft guide compares him to Santana Moss. The Bills haven't had too many recievers that can blow the opponents' doors off. Now the Bills might have two in Parrish and Evans. The pick feels a little weird, but past Evans and Moulds I think our receivers are VERY weak. We might have a trio that COULD compete with Indy's---Harrison--Stokely---Wayne. 314969[/snapback] Thanx for making me feel better, Dan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ndirish1978 Posted April 24, 2005 Share Posted April 24, 2005 our new philosphy is drafting special teams I guess. JK I think Parrish is the answer for our 3rd wr. Problem is, we still need better STARTING OL and DL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts