Jump to content

Trump 2024?


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

There was no audience.  There shouldn't be given the scenarios I presented.  Since when has fairness been an R characteristic.? We've decided to fight fire with fire.  Your assertion is weird.

 

OK fine, they can remove the audience.  I think that can be agreed upon in the negotiations.  She'll still refuse because she's scared.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

Karl Rove of the last 15 years is as much a savant as you and you’ve been wrong every step of the way. In this instance, Rove’s “savant” level prediction could be made by a polecat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

OK fine, they can remove the audience.  I think that can be agreed upon in the negotiations.  She'll still refuse because she's scared.

She said she’d debate him. He first withdrew, then he changed their terms. Not sure how she is scared, then again the false equivalence and goal post moving is strong with a many on this board. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

I'm betting he won't agree to this and then use it as an excuse to refuse to debate.  Hell, he wouldn't agree to a fact checker at the Black Journalist convention.  Why do you think that was?


Kamala Harris has to actually put forth policy and take questions from the media for me to gaf about any criticism of Trump agreeing to sit down with people who hate him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SCBills said:


Kamala Harris has to actually put forth policy and take questions from the media for me to gaf about any criticism of Trump agreeing to sit down with people who hate him. 

No one gaf about you giving af.  The debate will happen or not.  If it doesn't, it won't be Kamala refusing.

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are there libs here complaining Harris has to debate on Fox - with an audience?  And Fox moderators neither of whom have proven to be anything but Trump fans.  
 

Lol.  What a joke.  
 

 

These terms aren’t far enough.  I don’t know why Trump and anyone from the GOP continues to play by the rules of a communist party.  
 

Should be Tucker and Joe Rogan moderating.  
 

No crowd necessary.   

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

that's because they don't.  They tried to overturn a valid election and will try again...


 

They should have tried harder because it wasn’t valid - the Democrat Party and this federal government are not valid.  
 


 

Meanwhile, it’s Pravda wing telling you that Harris should do what Biden did during the fraudulent 2020 election where he “won” 82 million votes - hide.  
 

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Sorry morons, early voting begins in PA by then.  You’ll have already been filling out illegal ballots by then.  
 

 


Also, why is ABC necessary?  Trump just took on 2 of the biggest partisan hacks on CNN and did every leftist terms of a debate since 2015.  He just appeared in Chicago with the most hostile democrat operative I’ve ever seen.   
 

Is Harris going to take questions from a Christians for religious fweeedom group?  
 

Go pound sand. 
 

And again, the current format is still unacceptable.  

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, SCBills said:


Kamala Harris has to actually put forth policy and take questions from the media for me to gaf about any criticism of Trump agreeing to sit down with people who hate him. 

‘Gaff’ or blatant raciest remarks your mileage may vary. And let’s look at why they ‘hate him’ is it because his life long hatred of blacks, especially black men. (Central Park 5, birtherism, rental discrimination lawsuits, as examples).  
 

and first thing out of the gate you have a reputation, why should we believe you? His response, I’ve never been so rudely treated and slurred the questioner. 
 

since she wasn’t planning on running for potus until 2 weeks ago, may be let’s give her the benefit of the doubt that you are giving herr felon and give her till the convention to lay out her agenda. You know like the project 2025 clone, agenda 47, was laid out a the gop convention.
 

 

1 hour ago, Doc said:

 

Trump debated Biden on the Dem Fox equivalent in CNN, with all conditions Biden asked for no less.  Why is she scared to reciprocate?

Did cnn settle for $768 million dollars for lying about the election results? I think not. And to think that media should have sides and it’s okay for fox to be on his side is insane, and the problem. 

Edited by Starr-Bills
Typo.
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Starr-Bills said:

‘Gaff’ or blatant raciest remarks your mileage may vary. And let’s look at why they ‘hate him’ is it because his life long hatred of blacks, especially black men. (Central Park 5, birtherism, rental discrimination lawsuits, as examples).  
 

and first thing out of the gate you have a reputation, why should we believe you? His response, I’ve never been so rudely treated and slurred the questioner. 
 

since she wasn’t planning on running for potus until 2 weeks ago, may be let’s give her the benefit of the doubt that you are giving herr felon and give her till the convention to lay out her agenda. You know like the project 2025 clone, agenda 47, was laid out a the gop convention.
 

 


We’re a little over a month from early voting in PA and your candidate doesn’t even have policy positions laid out. 

 

Shes taken zero questions from the media. 
 

Exactly how long of a honeymoon do you demand we give your Black Mirror social experiment candidate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Doc said:

 

Trump debated Biden on the Dem Fox equivalent in CNN, with all conditions Biden asked for no less.  Why is she scared to reciprocate?

Did cnn settle for $768 million dollars for lying about the election results? I think not. And to think that media should have sides and it’s okay for fox to be on his side is insane, and the problem. 
 

p.s. if she backed out and wanted to reschedule the calls of her not being able to stand up to job would never stop.

31 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:


Sorry morons, early voting begins in PA by then.  You’ll have already been filling out illegal ballots by then.  
 

 


Also, why is ABC necessary?  Trump just took on 2 of the biggest partisan hacks on CNN and did every leftist terms of a debate since 2015.  He just appeared in Chicago with the most hostile democrat operative I’ve ever seen.   
 

Is Harris going to take questions from a Christians for religious fweeedom group?  
 

Go pound sand. 
 

And again, the current format is still unacceptable.  

He agreed. 

51 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

Are there libs here complaining Harris has to debate on Fox - with an audience?  And Fox moderators neither of whom have proven to be anything but Trump fans.  
 

Lol.  What a joke.  
 

 

These terms aren’t far enough.  I don’t know why Trump and anyone from the GOP continues to play by the rules of a communist party.  
 

Should be Tucker and Joe Rogan moderating.  
 

No crowd necessary.   

I’m not debating that she shouldn’t appear on Fox. I’m debating that Trump should follow through with what he’s agreed to and not change the terms because he doesn’t like them. Not sure what’s so hard to understand about this. Or maybe this is just another example of why we can’t trust Trump. He won’t do what he says. He won’t do what he agrees to if he’s too scared to debate Kamala at the date and time that he already agreed to debate how is he gonna stand up to Putin or xi or Those socialist European countries? 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

I'm betting he won't agree to this and then use it as an excuse to refuse to debate.  Hell, he wouldn't agree to a fact checker at the Black Journalist convention.  Why do you think that was?

 

Because he didn't agree to it in the first debate, along with everything else Biden wanted, on CNN?  And don't make me laugh about "fact checkers."

 

1 hour ago, Big Blitz said:

Are there libs here complaining Harris has to debate on Fox - with an audience?  And Fox moderators neither of whom have proven to be anything but Trump fans.  
 

Lol.  What a joke. 

 

"Wahhhh.  If he don't get our way again, we're not debating.  Because he's scared!"

 

And it's funny to hear them call Baier and McCallum "sycophants" when Tapper and Bash were the moderators on CNN. :lol:

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

 

Old one ear felon was not “shot in the head”. But sure totally makes sense. 
 

also why is the old one ear felon walking away from his association with project 2025? I mean dozens of his WH staff worked on it, his name is in it dozens of times. Agenda 47 is based on it. If he is walking away from it what are his policies exactly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...