Doc Brown Posted September 5 Posted September 5 4 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said: Should Musk pay back the 4.9 billion dollar government subsidies he received to help build Tesla? 3
Biden is Mentally Fit Posted September 5 Posted September 5 2 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: Should Musk pay back the 4.9 billion dollar government subsidies he received to help build Tesla? What were the terms of the subsidies?
Starr-Bills Posted September 5 Posted September 5 I’m sold on this guy. What an amazing answer. the real question is how did a guy like this go bankrupt 6 time? Or end up owing $500,000,000 to ny state for fraud? 1
The Frankish Reich Posted September 5 Posted September 5 6 minutes ago, Starr-Bills said: I’m sold on this guy. What an amazing answer. the real question is how did a guy like this go bankrupt 6 time? Or end up owing $500,000,000 to ny state for fraud? I'll sum it up in 3 words: Supply Side Economics. 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted September 5 Posted September 5 4 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: I'll sum it up in 3 words: Supply Side Economics. but that doesn't include the words "tremendous" or "like we've never seen".
GMB 8888 Posted September 5 Posted September 5 (edited) Guys, I kind of want them to win now. This is the same question being asked to them, less than a day apart. The answers have no synergy… How can we make childcare more affordable… Trumps answer, I think he said tariffs will pay for it in that clip? Literally not a single piece of policy mentioned. JDs answer, ask a family member if they’d like to help out, and if that doesn’t work we’re going to remove all the childcare worker requirements so there’s no barriers for those people who love kids but can’t/don’t want to goto school for childcare. ——————————- this is some of the most incredible footage I’ve ever seen. Like legit, not a SINGLE policy answer…and Trumps answer made it VERY clear he has no idea how much childcare actually costs. can’t wait for all those deregulations on childcare lol. sounds reassuring. pleaseeeeee let these guys win, this is comedy gold. Edited September 5 by GMB 8888 2
Big Blitz Posted September 5 Posted September 5 1 hour ago, GMB 8888 said: Guys, I kind of want them to win now. This is the same question being asked to them, less than a day apart. The answers have no synergy… How can we make childcare more affordable… Trumps answer, I think he said tariffs will pay for it in that clip? Literally not a single piece of policy mentioned. JDs answer, ask a family member if they’d like to help out, and if that doesn’t work we’re going to remove all the childcare worker requirements so there’s no barriers for those people who love kids but can’t/don’t want to goto school for childcare. ——————————- this is some of the most incredible footage I’ve ever seen. Like legit, not a SINGLE policy answer…and Trumps answer made it VERY clear he has no idea how much childcare actually costs. can’t wait for all those deregulations on childcare lol. sounds reassuring. pleaseeeeee let these guys win, this is comedy gold. What’s this been for 4 years? Lolol
Roundybout Posted September 5 Posted September 5 5 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: What’s this been for 4 years? Lolol No one wants to listen to you, you neonazi-adjacent bum.
Big Blitz Posted September 5 Posted September 5 1 minute ago, Roundybout said: No one wants to listen to you, you neonazi-adjacent bum. Click ignore. Anyway…..state by swing state. PA at 60%
The Frankish Reich Posted September 5 Posted September 5 2 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: but that doesn't include the words "tremendous" or "like we've never seen". Bigly
Joe Ferguson forever Posted September 5 Posted September 5 15 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: What’s this been for 4 years? Lolol hmmm...538's forecast has Harris AHEAD by a similar margin https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2024-election-forecast/. Keep it up Nate. We need Harris voters to show up. She keeps telling people we're underdogs. There's a reason for that.
Roundybout Posted September 5 Posted September 5 1 minute ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: hmmm...538's forecast has Harris AHEAD by a similar margin https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2024-election-forecast/. Keep it up Nate. We need Harris voters to show up. She keeps telling people we're underdogs. There's a reason for that. Nate admitted his model is deeply flawed and predicted a convention bump that didn't happen. He's still tuning it in. 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted September 5 Posted September 5 6 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Nate admitted his model is deeply flawed and predicted a convention bump that didn't happen. He's still tuning it in. The responsible thing would be to stop publishing it. But if it motivates D voters...
phypon Posted September 5 Posted September 5 18 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: Click ignore. Anyway…..state by swing state. PA at 60% Looking worse and worse for unelected Harris and her idiot followers. Wait til the debate (if she doesn't back out). Should be a bloodbath. 1
Roundybout Posted September 5 Posted September 5 7 minutes ago, phypon said: Looking worse and worse for unelected Harris and her idiot followers. Wait til the debate (if she doesn't back out). Should be a bloodbath. Model /= polls
The Frankish Reich Posted September 5 Posted September 5 1 minute ago, Roundybout said: Model /= polls I have no reason to doubt that Silver's model is the best model he could come up with. And yes, my gut agrees with his projections, because the electoral college advantage is tough to overcome. On another point, I don't see why anyone is underestimating Kamala as a debate performer. She did well in he prior debates, including against Pence. She is no pushover. And Trump is gonna Trump, which some people will always like, but more will always dislike. 1
phypon Posted September 5 Posted September 5 2 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Model /= polls Except when Harris is ahead, right commie? Yeah, pretty sure that's how it works. F*cking commie 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted September 5 Posted September 5 Inquiring minds need to know. Excellent article by a political scientist. In short, they're worth is doubtful and it will take decades to judge their success or failure. https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/09/03/election-forecasts-data-00176905 1
Recommended Posts