Gene Frenkle Posted July 26 Share Posted July 26 I assume you support entitlements to help take care of the child after forcing the birth, right? Or maybe just mind your business and stay out of the business of others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted July 26 Share Posted July 26 2 minutes ago, Gene Frenkle said: I assume you support entitlements to help take care of the child after forcing the birth, right? Or maybe just mind your business and stay out of the business of others. Sure, as long as it goes to the kid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted July 26 Share Posted July 26 Just now, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Sure, as long as it goes to the kid. That's not what your team says! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted July 26 Share Posted July 26 3 minutes ago, Gene Frenkle said: I assume you support entitlements to help take care of the child after forcing the birth, right? Or maybe just mind your business and stay out of the business of others. Do you think women having multiple abortions is a positive? Just now, Gene Frenkle said: That's not what your team says! Team America? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted July 26 Share Posted July 26 5 minutes ago, Gene Frenkle said: Well, my opinion isn't based on a 2,000 year old book, so there's that. Interesting that you mention the Bible. Because the Bible doesn't expressly mention "abortion" (any word that would translate as such), but at least the Old Testament is pretty clear that causing a miscarriage isn't akin to murder. Even deliberately causing a woman to miscarry by striking her resulted in the perpetrator being fined. It was only when the pregnant woman herself was otherwise harmed that it was treated like a crime. Exodus 21, for example, suggests that a pregnant woman’s life is more valuable than the fetus’s. This text describes a scenario in which men who are fighting strike a pregnant woman and cause her to miscarry. A monetary fine is imposed if the woman suffers no other harm beyond the miscarriage. However, if the woman suffers additional harm, the perpetrator’s punishment is to suffer reciprocal harm, up to life for life. https://nevadacurrent.com/2022/07/20/what-the-bible-actually-says-about-abortion-may-surprise-you/#:~:text=Yet the Hebrew and Greek,simply is not directly mentioned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted July 26 Share Posted July 26 4 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Do you think women having multiple abortions is a positive? Team America? Definitely not. Why is Donald Ducking the debate? 2 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Interesting that you mention the Bible. Because the Bible doesn't expressly mention "abortion" (any word that would translate as such), but at least the Old Testament is pretty clear that causing a miscarriage isn't akin to murder. Even deliberately causing a woman to miscarry by striking her resulted in the perpetrator being fined. It was only when the pregnant woman herself was otherwise harmed that it was treated like a crime. Exodus 21, for example, suggests that a pregnant woman’s life is more valuable than the fetus’s. This text describes a scenario in which men who are fighting strike a pregnant woman and cause her to miscarry. A monetary fine is imposed if the woman suffers no other harm beyond the miscarriage. However, if the woman suffers additional harm, the perpetrator’s punishment is to suffer reciprocal harm, up to life for life. https://nevadacurrent.com/2022/07/20/what-the-bible-actually-says-about-abortion-may-surprise-you/#:~:text=Yet the Hebrew and Greek,simply is not directly mentioned. You assume they actually read the bible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted July 26 Share Posted July 26 2 minutes ago, Gene Frenkle said: Definitely not. Why is Donald Ducking the debate? You assume they actually read the bible? I already answer that, keep up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted July 26 Share Posted July 26 1 minute ago, Gene Frenkle said: You assume they actually read the bible? Good point. If you do read the Bible, you're going to find out exactly nothing there that illuminates the modern abortion debate. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 26 Share Posted July 26 3 hours ago, Pokebball said: Makes sense to me. Yup. Why bother debating her before the DNC? Keep planting the seeds that she's terrible and they might replace her. The next debate was scheduled for September 10th anyway. But the "Trump is afraid of Harris" talk is hilarious. There's a reason she didn't get a single delegate in 2020 and was the first to drop out. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted July 26 Share Posted July 26 7 minutes ago, Doc said: Yup. Why bother debating her before the DNC? Keep planting the seeds that she's terrible and they might replace her. The next debate was scheduled for September 10th anyway. But the "Trump is afraid of Harris" talk is hilarious. There's a reason she didn't get a single delegate in 2020 and was the first to drop out. Donald Duck 2.0 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted July 26 Author Share Posted July 26 (edited) Trump is a little pus Edited July 26 by Tiberius Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blitz Posted July 26 Share Posted July 26 Please make this the night of Harris’ “acceptance” speech at the DNC 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backintheday544 Posted July 26 Share Posted July 26 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4th&long Posted July 26 Share Posted July 26 4 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said: He should be afraid. Harris will run circles around him and make him look like the idiot he is. The guy is a mental midget. 2 hours ago, Doc said: Yup. Why bother debating her before the DNC? Keep planting the seeds that she's terrible and they might replace her. The next debate was scheduled for September 10th anyway. But the "Trump is afraid of Harris" talk is hilarious. There's a reason she didn't get a single delegate in 2020 and was the first to drop out. You keep telling yourself this doc. It should all work out just fine for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 2 hours ago, 4th&long said: He should be afraid. Harris will run circles around him and make him look like the idiot he is. The guy is a mental midget. You keep telling yourself this doc. It should all work out just fine for you. That's what you guys said about Biden. Many of us knew to trust what we saw and not what you were yelling yourselves. Trump doesn't fear her and he'll wipe the walls with her. And all she'll be able to do is pull out the race and sex cards. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backintheday544 Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 2 minutes ago, Doc said: That's what you guys said about Biden. Many of us knew to trust what we saw and not what you were yelling yourselves. Trump doesn't fear her and he'll wipe the walls with her. And all she'll be able to do is pull out the race and sex cards. Then why is he backing out? Seems like a scared person move. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 11 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said: Then why is he backing out? Seems like a scared person move. Let's try another tack. Show me where he said he's backing out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backintheday544 Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 8 minutes ago, Doc said: Let's try another tack. Show me where he said he's backing out. Maybe he can grow a pair and decide to debate her. But as of now, he’s a ball-less coward who is scared of Kamala. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 2 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said: Maybe he can grow a pair and decide to debate her. But as of now, he’s a ball-less coward who is scared of Kamala. He'll debate her when they make her the nominee. It's right there in front of you. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backintheday544 Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 Just now, Doc said: He'll debate her when they make her the nominee. It's right there in front of you. Sure he will. She’s the presumptive nominee and already has the backing of the party. Obama even called their bluff and endorsed her formally. The prosecutor vs the convict will probably not happen. If it does, Trump will just embarrass himself. Hell, he embarrassed him self last time, just Biden was more embarrassing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts