New Improved DC Tom Posted November 26, 2020 Posted November 26, 2020 23 hours ago, shoshin said: A theater where the evidence of fraud is on Twitter (or I guess Parler is now where the echo chamber HQ is), not in the [Deep State controlled] courts. Seems like Occam’s Razor missed you as well. Tens of thousands of people in on the conspiracy vs just happened to lose an election. Hmm. 2 more weeks I think she said. December 15 is about right. I don't think you understand Occam"s razor.
GaryPinC Posted November 27, 2020 Posted November 27, 2020 2 hours ago, New Improved DC Tom said: I don't think you understand Occam"s razor. I'm not sure you do. Maybe it's just differing perspective. I follow how Shoshin uses it and it seems correct. All of Trump's bluster of fraud in all these states, Soros, South Americans, scores of witnesses, etc. That's one theory, the other is that Trump simply lost the election fair and square. Occam's razor would favor theory 2. How is this incorrect?
TBBills Posted November 27, 2020 Posted November 27, 2020 (edited) 9 minutes ago, GaryPinC said: How is this incorrect? I know Docs answer, b.c it doesn't support Trump. He might try to say it a different way but in the end that will be his goal. Edited November 27, 2020 by TBBills 1
The Frankish Reich Posted November 27, 2020 Posted November 27, 2020 (edited) On 11/25/2020 at 4:29 PM, keepthefaith said: She was never hired by Trump. Both camps have said this. She clearly was part of his post-election "litigation team." But I do agree that she wasn't canned because Trump himself disagreed with her strategy. She was canned because her strategy was -- and is -- to cast wild aspersions at election officials and governors left and right, Democratic AND Republican, and given the Georgia run-off election it would have been uncomfortable for her to remain part of the official team. So now she runs her own shadow freak show. I read part of her "Kraken" Georgia complaint. It is an embarrassment to the legal profession. I don't mean that as a political comment. I mean that as a lawyer. References to affidavits that don't support the argument. Misspellings and grammatical errors all over the place. "Expert" affidavits not supported by a CV outlining the credentials of the supposed expert. And on and on. EDIT: nonlawyers can start here. What a joke of a filing. It really should get her sanctioned, but I'm sure it won't. Instead it will just be dismissed. It is a crazy tweet storm wrapped in a mis-captioned legal format. https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/sidney-powell-mocked-scorned-ridiculed-and-more-over-clumsy-rambling-typo-filled-kraken-lawsuits/ Edited November 27, 2020 by The Frankish Reich 1
Unforgiven Posted November 27, 2020 Posted November 27, 2020 Evidence and facts are lies to the stunted dunce left. They like their feels and distorted reality, it's all they can comprehend. 1
TBBills Posted November 27, 2020 Posted November 27, 2020 1 minute ago, Unforgiven said: Evidence and facts are lies to the stunted dunce left. They like their feels and distorted reality, it's all they can comprehend. You got that backwards actually... You basically just described Trump and yourself. 1
oldmanfan Posted November 27, 2020 Posted November 27, 2020 14 minutes ago, Unforgiven said: Evidence and facts are lies to the stunted dunce left. They like their feels and distorted reality, it's all they can comprehend. Well, I’m independent and as near as I can tell not one piece of factual evidence has been put forth in any court yet by Trump and his minions. List the specific evidence and facts that have been or pipe down and accept reality. 1 1
Iron Maiden Posted November 28, 2020 Posted November 28, 2020 Trump's lawyers have signed the below in PA...they clearly state that there's no fraud.... "“Petitioners do not allege, and there is no evidence of, any fraud in connection with the challenged ballots; Petitioners do not allege, and there is no evidence of, any misconduct in connection with the challenged ballots; Petitioners do not allege, and there is no evidence of, any impropriety in connection with the challenged ballots; Petitioners do not allege, and there is no evidence of, any undue influence committed with respect to the challenged ballots.” Can't be clearer than that........it's all about getting $$ from the cult.......
TBBills Posted December 1, 2020 Posted December 1, 2020 (edited) https://www.businessinsider.com/sidney-powell-election-lawsuit-witness-vote-problems-edison-county-2020-12 Looks like Sydney Powell is making up names of counties for her lawsuit. @Unforgiven how's that for distorting reality. Edited December 1, 2020 by TBBills 1
Warcodered Posted December 1, 2020 Posted December 1, 2020 (edited) 10 minutes ago, TBBills said: https://www.businessinsider.com/sidney-powell-election-lawsuit-witness-vote-problems-edison-county-2020-12 Looks like Sydney Powell is making up names of counties for her lawsuit. @Unforgiven how's that for distorting reality. Did they mix it up with another state again? Quote In fact, there is no Edison County in the entire United States of America. guess not. Edited December 1, 2020 by Warcodered 1 1
Coach Tuesday Posted December 2, 2020 Posted December 2, 2020 On 11/26/2020 at 6:54 PM, New Improved DC Tom said: I don't think you understand Occam"s razor. Your act is soooooo tired. 4
Q-baby! Posted December 2, 2020 Posted December 2, 2020 On 11/27/2020 at 2:41 PM, Unforgiven said: Evidence and facts are lies to the stunted dunce left. They like their feels and distorted reality, it's all they can comprehend. Do you know how crazy you are?
WEATHER DOT COM Posted December 2, 2020 Posted December 2, 2020 2 hours ago, Q-baby! said: Do you know how crazy you are? His shrink does. 1
DrDawkinstein Posted December 2, 2020 Posted December 2, 2020 4 minutes ago, shoshin said: Trump Strike Farce more top notch moments. These are the mistakes you see when prisoners represent themselves. Oooh, I like the foreshadowing in this episode. 1 1
The Frankish Reich Posted December 3, 2020 Posted December 3, 2020 The level of advocacy of this rag tag bunch of litigators is just astonishingly bad. They have raised $170 million to fight this fight! With that you can afford a superb team, including excellent investigators who can prepare clean, clear affidavits in support of claims of fraud or malfeasance instead of a bunch of septuagenarians, most of whom haven't even argued a case in decades. But there's two problems with that: 1. Good lawyers have some standards. They won't just advance arguments based on what some twitter blowhard is tweeting. So they ran away. Fast. 2. Trump apparently doesn't want to spend that money he's raised. He's pocketing it for future purposes. The result: instead of a professional team with in-house investigators putting together a comprehensible strategy, they have the likes of Sidney Powell basically repackaging some freelance twitter guy's fraud theory without even the most basic fact-checking. That's how you get stuff like the declaration about fraud in the nonexistent "Edison County." https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2020/12/01/election-lawsuit-cites-fraud-michigan-county-does-not-exist/6475368002/ We are now a full month past the election. There is no reason why they're still filing raw/unchecked conspiracy theory nonsense like this. Other than the reasons I just noted.
TBBills Posted December 3, 2020 Posted December 3, 2020 3 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said: They have raised $170 million to fight this fight! With that you can afford a superb team Trump raised $170 million for himself... He isn't gonna waste money on something he knows he isn't gonna win. This money is for his legal battles once he isn't president. 1
New Improved DC Tom Posted December 4, 2020 Posted December 4, 2020 On 12/2/2020 at 7:29 AM, Coach Tuesday said: Your act is soooooo tired. Well...clearly, none of you do. It's not "the simplest answer is correct."
Recommended Posts