Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Sal was talking about it this morning on the morning show.  The Bills are actually tied for 4th in the league with 14 takeaways....tied with several other teams but still.

Doesn't that seem weird?  I wouldn't have guessed this at all.  I really would have guessed we were probably in the bottom 10.

 

https://www.espn.com/nfl/stats/team/_/view/turnovers/table/miscellaneous/sort/totalTakeaways/dir/desc

 

Did you also know that otters hold hands when they sleep in the water so they don't drift away from each other?

 

Holding Hands Sleeping GIF by AFV Pets - Find & Share on GIPHY

 

Officer Clawhauser Aww GIF - OfficerClawhauser Aww Zootopia - Discover &  Share GIFs

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 6
  • Haha (+1) 17
  • Awesome! (+1) 5
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

top ten in sacks as well. we'll see where we end up after our bye week but it should still be close to top ten..... i can deal with the yards being given if they can keep finding ways to turn it over and get home on the qb.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

Yeah, it's kind of surprising. I knew we were doing better than last year, but that isnt saying much.

 

I also need to look up where we rank in turnover differential. One of the biggest steps Josh has taken this year has been cutting out the turnovers. Even with those big numbers he put up last Sunday, the most impressive number was 0. No INTs, No Fumbles. Especially with getting sacked so many times.

 

 

What-if-i-say-im-not-like-the-otters.jpg

Edited by DrDawkinstein
  • Haha (+1) 7
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, DrDawkinstein said:

Yeah, it's kind of surprising. I knew we were doing better than last year, but that isnt saying much.

 

I also need to look up where we rank in turnover differential. One of the biggest steps Josh has taken this year has been cutting out the turnovers. Even with those big numbers he put up last Sunday, the most impressive number was 0. No INTs, No Fumbles. Especially with getting sacked so many times.

+3. good for 9th.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Stank_Nasty said:

top ten in sacks as well. we'll see where we end up after our bye week but it should still be close to top ten..... i can deal with the yards being given if they can keep finding ways to turn it over and get home on the qb.

 

The first turnover from our big 3...Hyde, Poyer and White came this past weekend.  Hyde still is waiting.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

The first turnover from our big 3...Hyde, Poyer and White came this past weekend.  Hyde still is waiting.

 

We had 4 TOs against Seattle, right? 2 INTs and 2 Fumbles.

 

Not to be a Debbie Downer, but that one feast game kinda skews our stats and standing. Without them, we'd be -1 in TO differential. Which is more indicative of our overall performance.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

We had 4 TOs against Seattle, right? 2 INTs and 2 Fumbles.

 

Not to be a Debbie Downer, but that one feast game kinda skews our stats and standing. Without them, we'd be -1 in TO differential. Which is more indicative of our overall performance.

 

and if my aunt had nuts she would be my uncle.

 

all the games count brother. 

  • Like (+1) 6
  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Posted
30 minutes ago, teef said:

I’ll punch an otter right in the face. 

Your a hard guy Teef, 😂

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
33 minutes ago, PaattMaann said:

 

and if my aunt had nuts she would be my uncle.

 

all the games count brother. 

 

Absolutely. We are what our record and stats say we are. That's usually how I feel 99.999% of the time.

 

But anomalies do get thrown out in stats and analytics for a reason. Just something to keep in mind.

 

Now, if we string together a few more +4 TO games, then that will really be something.

 

 

Edited by DrDawkinstein
me grammar good
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Absolutely. We are what our record and stats say we are. That's usually how I feel 99.999% of the time.

 

But anomalies do get thrown out in stats and analytics for a reason. Just something to keep in mind.

 

Now, if we string together a few more +4 TO games, then that will be really something.

 

 

 

I hear you. All I will say is, the same goes for every team in the league though. Its not like we are the only team that has 4 TO games in their stats. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted

Differential is a great indicator of success. We're no. 9 at plus 3. Only one above us (the browns) are likely not a playoff team. 

 

We're no. 2 in fumble recoveries, which I would not have guessed. 

 

 

×
×
  • Create New...