Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, ALLEN1QB said:

Hope everyone likes Vanilla because I have a feeling it's McClapper's new favorite flavor.

With the next opponent being Seattle, and high flying QB Russell Wilson, and pleasant weather conditions looking likely, Buffalo will likely shoot for a balanced attack.  They'll try to run some to run clock and keep the ball away from Wilson, but I think they know they'll have to be able to get some chunk plays through the air too.

Posted
28 minutes ago, Gregthekeg said:

It seems like they always have one or two plays were they do that.  Always around the 25-30 yard line, a sweep, or qb run or something that bites them in the butt.  

 

We do it too predictably sometimes.  I understand why we do it, it's been successful for us a lot.  But when I know its coming watching it from the couch, the D does too and now we're 2nd and 18.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

Because we ran the ball?

Looks nothing like the offense we had the first 4 weeks now they look like the same old predictable Buffalo Bills. Just trying not to lose instead of trying to win.

Posted
14 minutes ago, ALLEN1QB said:

Hope everyone likes Vanilla because I have a feeling it's McClapper's new favorite flavor.

You prefer that he throw the ball with 7 DBs out there? 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, ALLEN1QB said:

Looks nothing like the offense we had the first 4 weeks now they look like the same old predictable Buffalo Bills. Just trying not to lose instead of trying to win.

 

You think he McDermott doesn't want to score points or something?

 

So basically, New England puts seven defensive backs out there and you're not happy we ran?  

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, YoloinOhio said:

You prefer that he throw the ball with 7 DBs out there? 


I definitely think that they could’ve mixed in more bubble screens and short zone throws to keep the offense moving if they wanted, but the fact is that they scored 24 points (which should have been 28 if not for a brutal drop) in a windstorm and got the job done.

 

JWB

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

You think he McDermott doesn't want to score points or something?

 

So basically, New England puts seven defensive backs out there and you're not happy we ran?  

Nope should have cost us the game if not for the fumble. Other teams are put in the same position and they have no problems

Edited by ALLEN1QB
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, ALLEN1QB said:

Nope should have cost us the game if not for the fumble. Other teams are put in the same position and they have no problems


How so? A drop by Davis on 3rd and goal cost the team 4 points and a 28-21 lead. That was a pass play by the way.

 

Games aren’t proverbially “won” very often in the NFL—as per Belichick himself, most games are lost, not won. I’ve watched NE****** win games because other teams gave it away for 20 years. 
 

J.W.B.

Posted
4 minutes ago, ALLEN1QB said:

Nope should have cost us the game if not for the fumble. Other teams are put in the same position and they have no problems

 

Yeah like the Saints up 10 in the 4th ;) 

 

They got lucky.

Posted
55 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

He said the conditions weren't really that bad.  Wind gusts here and there.

 

The Bills ran it so much because NE constantly had 7 defensive backs on the field. 

 

NE ran it so much because the Bills have a bad run defense and wanted to big boy us....plus they don't trust Cam.

 

Belicheck was afraid of us throwing all over him?


Joe B and Fairburn said the same thing.  The flags on the goal posts were blowing but down on field level it wasn’t too windy.  The rain seems to stop in the first half too.

 

Belichick emulated what other defenses have done the past 4 weeks - disguised looks, dropped 6 players, and had 2 players deep.  I think the difference was that the Bills ran it better than they would have liked 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, ALLEN1QB said:

Looks nothing like the offense we had the first 4 weeks now they look like the same old predictable Buffalo Bills. Just trying not to lose instead of trying to win.

 

They were playing 7 DB's most of the game to take away the passing game so you adapt and run.

 

The Bills won quit being such a killjoy. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, thebandit27 said:


I definitely think that they could’ve mixed in more bubble screens and short zone throws to keep the offense moving if they wanted, but the fact is that they scored 24 points (which should have been 28 if not for a brutal drop) in a windstorm and got the job done.

 

JWB

You know I just looked at the Drops numbers on PFR advanced stats and G.Davis is still showing no drops this season (and the stats are updated). So wth constitutes a drop then?

Posted
7 minutes ago, ALLEN1QB said:

Nope should have cost us the game if not for the fumble. Other teams are put in the same position and they have no problems

 

So basically you want to throw on 7 defensive backs.  

So the game plan that the Chiefs played against us by running when we had 7 defensive backs on the field was wrong.  They should have just thrown all day.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Royale with Cheese said:

 

So basically you want to throw on 7 defensive backs.  

So the game plan that the Chiefs played against us by running when we had 7 defensive backs on the field was wrong.  They should have just thrown all day.

 

Yes - deep throws too 🤣

Posted
28 minutes ago, ALLEN1QB said:

Hope everyone likes Vanilla because I have a feeling it's McClapper's new favorite flavor.

Always been his favorite......  BTW teams are also afaid of Mahomes passing, Rodgers, Brees, Wilson, Dak, Brady.......  So what, you have a stud and receivers that can overcome it?

 

Great back to 175 yard passing games?    

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, D. L. Hot-Flamethrower said:

You know I just looked at the Drops numbers on PFR advanced stats and G.Davis is still showing no drops this season (and the stats are updated). So wth constitutes a drop then?


PFR doesn’t usually update until Wednesday IIRC...

Posted
1 hour ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

I saw that break down somewhere else this morning too.

 

Yep, teams are afraid of Josh and our WRs.

I think with NE.  It was trying to get some Speed on the field.  That defense is so freaking slow.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Royale with Cheese said:

He said the conditions weren't really that bad.  Wind gusts here and there.

 

The Bills ran it so much because NE constantly had 7 defensive backs on the field. 

 

NE ran it so much because the Bills have a bad run defense and wanted to big boy us....plus they don't trust Cam.

 

Belicheck was afraid of us throwing all over him?

Just like he did  in the 1990 SB against us with that 6 DB package. I wish we had a Thurman Thomas like RB that could just destroy you if you go into that 6 CB look on defense.

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...