Steptide Posted November 2, 2020 Posted November 2, 2020 Something that drives me nuts. We always here Allen/daboll/McDermott talk about how each week is different, and I get that. However, they rarely run screens which can destroy a defense. I believe this would open up both the pass and run game if they did this more. Singletery and moss, even beasley would be perfect to run screens. Just don't understand why they don't do it more 2
Captain Caveman Posted November 2, 2020 Posted November 2, 2020 This has also bothered me for the past year, and I almost wonder if Allen just has a really hard time with the touch on those short passes and they see it as a liability (maybe for INTs / turnovers?)
BuffaloRebound Posted November 2, 2020 Posted November 2, 2020 One reason we might not be the best screen team is because teams have to stay home with Josh’s ability to run and make plays when he gets pressure. If I was a defensive coordinator I’d stay home and make Josh beat me from the pocket. Screens work best when the defensive linemen and linebackers get caught upfield. 3
Rc2catch Posted November 2, 2020 Posted November 2, 2020 The screen to smoke worked out really well for them yesterday. But I do agree they should at least be attempting 3-4 a game. 2
SCBills Posted November 2, 2020 Posted November 2, 2020 I wouldn’t mind more WR screens when teams are playing off guys to give Allen more easy throws and allow our WRs to make a play. The RB screen game is something you call when teams get aggressive bringing pressure. Lately, all we’ve seen is 2-deep coverage zone, keeping everything in front of the defense. 5
Ethan in Cleveland Posted November 2, 2020 Posted November 2, 2020 2 hours ago, SCBills said: I wouldn’t mind more WR screens when teams are playing off guys to give Allen more easy throws and allow our WRs to make a play. The RB screen game is something you call when teams get aggressive bringing pressure. Lately, all we’ve seen is 2-deep coverage zone, keeping everything in front of the defense. Agreed. This post answers the OP question
Mrbojanglezs Posted November 2, 2020 Posted November 2, 2020 How dependent is the screen game on the olines ability to run and executive it? Maybe our line isn't athletic enough 2 hours ago, BuffaloRebound said: One reason we might not be the best screen team is because teams have to stay home with Josh’s ability to run and make plays when he gets pressure. If I was a defensive coordinator I’d stay home and make Josh beat me from the pocket. Screens work best when the defensive linemen and linebackers get caught upfield. Screens seem to work fine for the chiefs and Mahomes can run as well
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted November 2, 2020 Posted November 2, 2020 Look, I too complain about Daboll's calling but SIX and TWO 1 1
Simon Posted November 2, 2020 Posted November 2, 2020 3 minutes ago, Mrbojanglezs said: How dependent is the screen game on the olines ability to run and executive it? Maybe our line isn't athletic enough Bingo. And with the constant shuffling the interior of the OLine has been dealing with (and will be going forward), co-ordinating it successfully is a huge problem.
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted November 2, 2020 Posted November 2, 2020 We were effective at screens during the first and maybe second game this year. Then we reverted to the normal Bills inept screen game that has plagued this team for 20 straight years. 1
HOUSE Posted November 2, 2020 Posted November 2, 2020 Daboll is on the hot seat and should be gone any day now.... 2 1
Bleeding Bills Blue Posted November 2, 2020 Posted November 2, 2020 2 hours ago, Steptide said: Something that drives me nuts. We always here Allen/daboll/McDermott talk about how each week is different, and I get that. However, they rarely run screens which can destroy a defense. I believe this would open up both the pass and run game if they did this more. Singletery and moss, even beasley would be perfect to run screens. Just don't understand why they don't do it more They checked to a couple WR screens when NE played off coverage. RB/TE screens aren't that popular against NE since they focus on rush depth and try not to get too wide.
Bleeding Bills Blue Posted November 2, 2020 Posted November 2, 2020 1 minute ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said: We were effective at screens during the first and maybe second game this year. Then we reverted to the normal Bills inept screen game that has plagued this team for 20 straight years. The 21 yard brown completion was a screen. I think there was 1 to diggs as well. 1
MAJBobby Posted November 2, 2020 Posted November 2, 2020 This team has been running Screens all year and pretty effective too. Not going to see them Sunday when you are seeing 7 DBs and a muddle pass rush (to contain Josh's legs)
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted November 2, 2020 Posted November 2, 2020 (edited) 4 minutes ago, MAJBobby said: This team has been running Screens all year and pretty effective too. Not going to see them Sunday when you are seeing 7 DBs and a muddle pass rush (to contain Josh's legs) see I would think screens against 6-7 DBs might be a way to go. WRs and TEs and pulling guards can block little DBs pretty nicely. Edited November 2, 2020 by Over 29 years of fanhood
Bleeding Bills Blue Posted November 2, 2020 Posted November 2, 2020 Just now, Over 29 years of fanhood said: see I would think screens against 6-7 DBs might be a way to go. WRs and TEs and pulling ends can block little DBs pretty nicely They did it when they played off coverage a few times. The Brown one was a big play where we threw the ball right off the snap and had kroft/bease out in front blocking. 1
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted November 2, 2020 Posted November 2, 2020 (edited) 2 minutes ago, dneveu said: They did it when they played off coverage a few times. The Brown one was a big play where we threw the ball right off the snap and had kroft/bease out in front blocking. yeah, it worked well right? Josh can get it out there quickly too. hope to see it more. Edited November 2, 2020 by Over 29 years of fanhood
Big Turk Posted November 2, 2020 Posted November 2, 2020 (edited) 2 hours ago, Rc2catch said: The screen to smoke worked out really well for them yesterday. But I do agree they should at least be attempting 3-4 a game. Honestly I don't know why we don't do what Brady used to...if he saw a DB playing 10 yards off he would simply give the WR some type of hand signal, take the snap and then immediately throw it to him for an easy 7-10 yard gain or more if he could break a tackle. It's the easiest 7 yards you'll ever get with 0 chance of a negative play. The worst that could happen is it is an incomplete pass. Edited November 2, 2020 by matter2003 2
Bleeding Bills Blue Posted November 2, 2020 Posted November 2, 2020 Just now, matter2003 said: Honestly I don't know why we don't do what Brady used to...if he saw a DB playing 10 yards off he would simply give the WR some type of hand signal, take the snap and then immediately throw it to him for an easy 7-10 yard gain or more if he could break a tackle. It's the easiest 7 yards you'll ever get. They were able to run a lot of screens to RBs/TEs too because brady is a statue as well. Teams don't worry about losing contain and rush depth.
Recommended Posts