Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It was a borderline hit, but I think it was closer to legal.  Back in the day, that's a perfect play and shown for years to come on highlight videos.

Posted
Just now, familykwi said:

That flag was too obvious.  If he uses his hands instead of turning the shoulder forward, he might have avoided the penalty.

It wasn't head to head.  He led with his shoulder against a defenseless receiver.  The penalty call is correct.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Wo-Bah said:

I thought it was a good football hit. I have to see it again if he got his head. 

 

It was clean, you just can't hit a player that hard in today's league.  I get it.  The game is too fast these days.

Posted
Just now, Meatloaf63 said:

Bs terrible call, nothing else he could do 

 

Gonna disagree.  It's football, but it was the right call.  Believe me, these refs are bad, but that one was correct.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, Billsatlastin2018 said:


 

NOOOOOO! It’s not. It’s a head shot from the 70s, a stupid one, now giving the  JESTS a clean shot to tie!

What are you talking about? Hyde damn near turned his back...

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...