formerlyofCtown Posted October 29, 2020 Posted October 29, 2020 44 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said: Trump fraudulently used over $2 million of charity funds for personal use. He even signed statements agreeing that he did so. Worst of all, he used the funds to buy a Tebow jersey. Hillary Clinton sold plutonium to an enemy of the United States. That's treason. What you're saying is misappropriation of funds and a Civil matter not Criminal also not theft. The $2 mil is the amount he agreed to pay not what he misused.
Backintheday544 Posted October 29, 2020 Posted October 29, 2020 14 minutes ago, formerlyofCtown said: Hillary Clinton sold plutonium to an enemy of the United States. That's treason. What you're saying is misappropriation of funds and a Civil matter not Criminal also not theft. The $2 mil is the amount he agreed to pay not what he misused. whataboutism at its finest! What was the amount he misused them? I feel like even misusing $1 of charitable funds would be bad. Also, are you saying he paid $2,000,000 as a settlement? So the actual misuse of funds is actually higher and Trump as a good business man negotiated the amounts lower?
formerlyofCtown Posted October 29, 2020 Posted October 29, 2020 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said: whataboutism at its finest! What was the amount he misused them? I feel like even misusing $1 of charitable funds would be bad. Also, are you saying he paid $2,000,000 as a settlement? So the actual misuse of funds is actually higher and Trump as a good business man negotiated the amounts lower? Never called him a saint but he does appear to be the lesser of 1000 evils. Let me know when his name appears with legitimate suspicion of human trafficking like Biden, Pelosi and the Clintons or is it ok to touch or enslave children as long as you don't misuse money for their well being. Edited October 29, 2020 by formerlyofCtown 1
The Frankish Reich Posted October 29, 2020 Posted October 29, 2020 33 minutes ago, formerlyofCtown said: Hillary Clinton sold plutonium to an enemy of the United States. That's treason. What you're saying is misappropriation of funds and a Civil matter not Criminal also not theft. The $2 mil is the amount he agreed to pay not what he misused. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-investigation/u-s-inquiry-into-fbi-clinton-spurred-by-republicans-ends-without-results-washington-post-idUSKBN1Z905V
reddogblitz Posted October 29, 2020 Posted October 29, 2020 4 hours ago, Backintheday544 said: Trump fraudulently used over $2 million of charity funds for personal use. He even signed statements agreeing that he did so. Worst of all, he used the funds to buy a Tebow jersey. Probably should have bought the Jay Cutler jersey instead.
formerlyofCtown Posted October 30, 2020 Posted October 30, 2020 (edited) 5 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-investigation/u-s-inquiry-into-fbi-clinton-spurred-by-republicans-ends-without-results-washington-post-idUSKBN1Z905V Lol. You expect the bureaucracy they created to investigate them. Next thing you'll say is that the Supreme Court they appoint will protect us from them. Why is Epstein dead and how is he dead when he was put into isolation as has become the standard in that type of situation. But hey. You keep drinking the kool aid from the Left. The other guys can keep drinking the kool aid from the Right and I'm just gonna enjoy life while a can. It's starting to get really amusing watching the rope and pony show. At least Trump slowed down their plans for a bit. There are no Republicans and Democrats in Washington just two different groups of people trying to take everything in this country they can get. All while looking out for their real Bosses. The thing Trump has that they don't is he has his own legit means to make money. The others sell your everything to get theirs. Be leary of people with no money offering you free things. I'm not a person you are going to win this argument with. I don't care about political character. You keep trying to attack and aggravate me like you would a Republican, that won't work guy. I think almost every politician for the last 150+ years is guilty of treason. I don't vote because I haven't found a politician that doesn't promote something unconstitutional in some way. Edited October 30, 2020 by formerlyofCtown 3 1
TBBills Posted October 30, 2020 Posted October 30, 2020 3 minutes ago, formerlyofCtown said: Lol. You expect the bureaucracy they created to investigate them. Next thing you'll say is that the Supreme Court they appoint will protect us from them. Why is Epstein dead and how is he dead when he was put into isolation as has become the standard in that type of situation. Probably ask Trump...
The Frankish Reich Posted October 30, 2020 Posted October 30, 2020 28 minutes ago, formerlyofCtown said: Lol. You expect the bureaucracy they created to investigate them. Next thing you'll say is that the Supreme Court they appoint will protect us from them. Why is Epstein dead and how is he dead when he was put into isolation as has become the standard in that type of situation. But hey. You keep drinking the kool aid from the Left. The other guys can keep drinking the kool aid from the Right and I'm just gonna enjoy life while a can. It's starting to get really amusing watching the rope and pony show. At least Trump slowed down their plans for a bit. There are no Republicans and Democrats in Washington just two different groups of people trying to take everything in this country they can get. All while looking out for their real Bosses. The thing Trump has that they don't is he has his own legit means to make money. The others sell your everything to get theirs. Be leary of people with no money offering you free things. I'm not a person you are going to win this argument with. I don't care about political character. You keep trying to attack and aggravate me like you would a Republican, that won't work guy. I think almost every politician for the last 150+ years is guilty of treason. I don't vote because I haven't found a politician that doesn't promote something unconstitutional in some way. Well, if you're just going all "a pox on both their houses," good for you. Not much to say about that. With respect to the limited question here -- the Uranium One thing -- this administration's hand-picked investigator, the US Attorney for Utah, did an investigation in which he and his team were handed substantial resources, and they found .... nothing. 1
formerlyofCtown Posted October 30, 2020 Posted October 30, 2020 (edited) 6 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Well, if you're just going all "a pox on both their houses," good for you. Not much to say about that. With respect to the limited question here -- the Uranium One thing -- this administration's hand-picked investigator, the US Attorney for Utah, did an investigation in which he and his team were handed substantial resources, and they found .... nothing. Except that it is and was public knowledge that it is fact that it happened as well as everything else. That they were cleared was the worst part about it. It's sick. They can do whatever they want and not be held accountable but if you per in public and somebody sees you peeing you'll pay for that the rest of your life. Try being some young kid that gets pressured into taking packages for a Cartel. See what happens to you. Trump's more likely to drown trying to drain the swamp than actually draining it. Because people like you only look at political party and listen to media that are a part of the swamp. The only people you can attempt to elect are the choices they put before you. The founders of this nation created a Republic where you could choose your public servants. The powers that be modified that system so that you had to have X amount of $ to even appear on the ballot. So this country has gone from choosing it's servants to picking from their choice of Dictators. Figure it out people. They are all bad news for you in some way because the majority are to big of cowards to do anything about it. Edited October 30, 2020 by formerlyofCtown 1 1
Big Blitz Posted November 19, 2020 Posted November 19, 2020 This is how they've been "rigging" the election since January 2017. How to tell Google has shadow banned you: https://eastvalleypost.com/how-to-tell-youve-been-blacklisted-by-google/ NEWS How to tell you’ve been blacklisted by Google… East Valley Post suddenly disappeared from Google Search without notice – read our first hand experience with being censored by Big Tech. 1 1
TBBills Posted November 19, 2020 Posted November 19, 2020 (edited) 6 hours ago, Big Blitz said: This is how they've been "rigging" the election since January 2017. How to tell Google has shadow banned you: https://eastvalleypost.com/how-to-tell-youve-been-blacklisted-by-google/ NEWS How to tell you’ve been blacklisted by Google… East Valley Post suddenly disappeared from Google Search without notice – read our first hand experience with being censored by Big Tech. That is funny, you are funny. 6 hours ago, Big Blitz said: On 11/1/2020 at 10:45 AM, B-Man said: IF YOU’RE RELYING ON SOCIAL MEDIA, YOU NEED TO CHOOSE AN ALTERNATIVE PLATFORM NOW: N.J. Women For Trump group, with 29K members, removed from Facebook days before election. Needed a good laugh Edited November 19, 2020 by TBBills
JaCrispy Posted November 19, 2020 Posted November 19, 2020 (edited) 4 hours ago, TBBills said: That is funny, you are funny. Needed a good laugh You laugh now....until they come for your side (and it will come)...always happens that way....people support the censorship as long as it’s for the other team....and are shocked when it comes for them...classic divide and conquer strategy...don’t fall for it...all Americans, Left and Right need to stand up for free speech or we are all screwed...👍 Edited November 19, 2020 by JaCrispy 2
Warcodered Posted November 19, 2020 Posted November 19, 2020 15 hours ago, Big Blitz said: This is how they've been "rigging" the election since January 2017. How to tell Google has shadow banned you: https://eastvalleypost.com/how-to-tell-youve-been-blacklisted-by-google/ NEWS How to tell you’ve been blacklisted by Google… East Valley Post suddenly disappeared from Google Search without notice – read our first hand experience with being censored by Big Tech.
TBBills Posted November 19, 2020 Posted November 19, 2020 (edited) 4 hours ago, JaCrispy said: You laugh now....until they come for your side (and it will come)...always happens that way....people support the censorship as long as it’s for the other team....and are shocked when it comes for them...classic divide and conquer strategy...don’t fall for it...all Americans, Left and Right need to stand up for free speech or we are all screwed...👍 Not really... The difference between free speech and brainwashing people into thinking something that isn't. Trump can still Tweet but his tweet have a warning b/c they are all hearsay/false information from the most powerful man in the country that many simple minded folks take as gods law. I understand you think this but I don't give a ***** about Parlor and that is a censored app that is Right wing only, yet our freedoms still not screwed. I will never understand the Right wings extremist views that never pan out. Edited November 19, 2020 by TBBills
JaCrispy Posted November 19, 2020 Posted November 19, 2020 24 minutes ago, TBBills said: Not really... The difference between free speech and brainwashing people into thinking something that isn't. Trump can still Tweet but his tweet have a warning b/c they are all hearsay/false information from the most powerful man in the country that many simple minded folks take as gods law. I understand you think this but I don't give a ***** about Parlor and that is a censored app that is Right wing only, yet our freedoms still not screwed. I will never understand the Right wings extremist views that never pan out. First off, as an adult I don’t need a”fact check” on something a politician says...I’m very capable of figuring it out on my own, as I’m sure you are too... Second, free speech was never intended to only protect speech you liked, or agreed with....the idea was to protect speech you detest and cant stand...it was an agreement between citizens of a free nation that, even though there would be many times when people did not agree, it was more important to the survival of the republic, that ALL speech was permitted (with exception to inciting physical violence)...and yes, my friend, it even includes what you refer to as “brainwashing”...and it’s the freedom of speech that allows us to make the determination, for ourselves, as adults (through debate), whether we believe such speech is legit “brainwashing” or not...👍 And, boy, am I so grateful for that! 1
TBBills Posted November 19, 2020 Posted November 19, 2020 1 minute ago, JaCrispy said: First off, as an adult I don’t need a”fact check” on something a politician says...I’m very capable of figuring it out on my own, as I’m sure you are too... Second, free speech was never intended to only protect speech you liked, or agreed with....the idea was to protect speech you detest and cant stand...it was an agreement between citizens of a free nation that, even though there would be many times when people did not agree, it was more important to the survival of the republic, that ALL speech was permitted (with exception to inciting physical violence)...and yes, my friend, it even includes what you refer to as “brainwashing”...and it’s the freedom of speech that allows us to make the determination, for ourselves, as adults (through debate), whether we believe such speech is legit “brainwashing” or not...👍 And, boy, am I so grateful for that! All speech is permitted... THey are not protecting the speech they are protecting the people that might believe something from a very powerful man that some people cling to his every word. Not like it will help then you get people claiming things like you see in this thread over it. Not one things has been done to say that free speech isnt happening. Do not forget your free speech only goes as far as the rules for that website. You want your own words to not have a warning under them you need to make your own twitter and you have the freedom to do that. Just like working for a big company... you have free speech but the company also has the right to fire you over that speech. Speech is free but the responsibility that comes with those words are real.
reddogblitz Posted November 28, 2020 Posted November 28, 2020 On 11/19/2020 at 1:44 PM, TBBills said: THey are not protecting the speech they are protecting the people that might believe something from a very powerful man that some people cling to his every word. I see this as a disturbing trend in the dumbing down of America. Now people will be too lazy to figure out what's true and what's not based and rely on what Mommy (Jack) says to believe. Do you really think its smart to allow social media companies to become the arbiter of truth? Sounds like a lot of power to give to the greatest invention ever for population control. And as JaCrispy pointed out, the censorship will come for your side one day.
TBBills Posted November 29, 2020 Posted November 29, 2020 (edited) 20 minutes ago, reddogblitz said: I see this as a disturbing trend in the dumbing down of America. Now people will be too lazy to figure out what's true and what's not based and rely on what Mommy (Jack) says to believe. Do you really think its smart to allow social media companies to become the arbiter of truth? Sounds like a lot of power to give to the greatest invention ever for population control. And as JaCrispy pointed out, the censorship will come for your side one day. It isn't really censorship, it's more of a warning to not take someone's twitter post seriously. Like a warning on a box of cigarettes... Don't worry thought the people that need that warning will ignore it anyway. Censorship would be not allowing Trump to tweet. Don't forget when you're using a platform like Twitter you are subject to their rules of their program. Just like you are subject to the rules of a stadium when you go to a football game. Edited November 29, 2020 by TBBills
The Frankish Reich Posted December 31, 2020 Posted December 31, 2020 So let's circle back to this whole ridiculous Section 230 (liability protections for internet services based on libelous comments made by content providers/commenters) issue. Mitch McConnell is holding up the Defense spending bill and increased stimulus checks over Trump's demand to that Section 230 repeal be included in any bill(s). Let's say that passes (it won't). Who is the first poster to be banned by Twitter? I say "The Real Donald Trump." Recently, we had an accusation that the Georgia Secretary of State's brother has worked for China. Umm, no. https://www.gpb.org/news/2020/12/30/fact-check-brad-raffenspergers-brother-not-chinese-tech-executive-named-ron Or how about Trumpy nutcase supporters like this attorney Lin Wood? He's now posting something vile about Chief Justice John Roberts involving his children and Jeffrey Epstein. If the 230 repeal passes, all of these people (and hundreds like them) can sue Twitter! And probably TBD, which is why banning some of our resident nuts was a perfectly sensible business decision even prior to any repeal. It'll be the death of the conspiracy theory internet world. Good riddance. But apparently Trump and Co. have no idea that that's what'll happen.
Doc Posted April 16, 2021 Posted April 16, 2021 So apparently a BLM co-founder bought several million dollar homes. Now anybody talking about it on Twitter, Facebook, etc. are either being canceled or having their posts deleted. What is going on in this country? 1
Recommended Posts