Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

All you need to prove former liberal activism and censorship on Twitter is one massive, memory holed anecdote.  But of course there are thousands more.

 

Brute censoring the NY Post Hunter Biden laptop story.

 

End of story.

 

Advertisers had no problem when Twitter did that.  

 

I wonder why?

 

 


Easy. Advertisers are small-c conservative and just want a place to put their ads in front of people’s eyeballs without harming the brand. 
 

Agree or disagree with Twitter’s content moderation approach, it was fairly stable and predictable. Brands didn’t need to worry too much about unpredictable chaos or negative blowback to their ads. 
 

Had Musk simply come in and tweaked the content moderation policy towards something you would probably find more favorable, there probably wouldn’t be much backlash from the brands. 
 

However, he severely overpaid for the site and now has to make debt service payments that are bigger than Twitter’s annual revenues. To do that, he had to layoff large swaths of employees, including those whose primary job was brand safety. 
 

In addition, instead of spending time testing and tweaking new features to ensure they wouldn’t negatively impact the environment, the new Twitter Blue was rushed to market with deep flaws that would endanger brand safety. 
 

Instead of recognizing that this is exactly the kind of unpredictable environment that brands do not want to be a part of, Musk doubled down, stating that they would continue to try different things and some would be dumb. 
 

Applications have dev environments and test environments so you can do stringent testing on any new code or features before pushing to production. Instead, it looks like Twitter will just test everything in prod, causing further chaos. 
 

Brands like boring stability. Musk is pushing Twitter towards more chaos. 
 

That‘s why brands are leaving. 

Just now, BillsFanNC said:

 

@ChiGoose rooting for more censorship and against free speech?

 

Say it ain't so!

Just another strawman from someone who apparently can’t read. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

Sure, keep telling yourself that. If you believe that Elon’s ownership of Twitter is going to end well, I have some crypto you can buy. 

 

Likewise. 

Posted
36 minutes ago, SCBills said:


Hes unorthodox for sure.  
 

User activity hit an all time high this past week and he’s beta testing in real time. 
 

Personally, i think it’s fascinating.  
 

The Twitter blue was an insane disaster though.  Can’t have too many more stumbles on that level … ie., stock prices tanking based on fake accounts making false announcements. 
 

Twitter will be fine though.  I think you may be more wishing for failure (long term) than expecting it. 


I very much don’t want Twitter to fail. I enjoy using it. I would love to be wrong here. 
 

I just think that Musk is a finance guy who has convinced himself that he’s an engineer and doesn’t understand what Twitter actually is. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

I very much don’t want Twitter to fail. I enjoy using it. I would love to be wrong here. 
 

I just think that Musk is a finance guy who has convinced himself that he’s an engineer and doesn’t understand what Twitter actually is. 

 

You realize that's literally the same thing everyone has said at every company he's started/taken over, right?

Posted
6 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

You realize that's literally the same thing everyone has said at every company he's started/taken over, right?

 

Sure, and he should be given more deference than the average owner because of that. 
 

But it doesn’t change the fact that adding $1 billion in extra costs and fostering a chaotic environment that increases brand risk is not a good strategy for running a company whose income is almost entirely from ads. 

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, ChiGoose said:

I very much don’t want Twitter to fail. I enjoy using it. I would love to be wrong here. 

 

I very much hope he flies it into the ground.  Don't worry, something else would replace it.  Maybe Tik Tok can come up with something?

 

Even with all its "content moderation" it is a great source of falsehoods. Its where we learned Michael Brown was running away from the police with his hands up when he was shot.  And where we learned Sandman and his friends accosted a minding his own business Indian yelling "Go back to your own country".   Its where the insurrectionists planned their insurrection.

 

Too much falsehood and waaaaaaay too much division fermented on there.  Its a net negative for American society IMHO.

 

But, have fun with it.

Edited by reddogblitz
Posted
3 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said:

He gave 92% of his money to Dems, but your point that some Republicans are scum bags is very true 


I think crypto is a scam and I’ve long thought it was a Ponzi scheme. The idea that the people involved were either idiots, scumbags or both is not surprising in the least. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

I am honestly having a hard time figuring out if this is a parody or if Elon is actually announcing a new feature that would have been completely unnecessary before he broke verification. 
 

 

×
×
  • Create New...