Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

****

 

Twitter not allowing a lying jack ass to post on their site is like a publish8ng company not agreeing to market a book by Nazis 

 

Whats the difference? 

You got kicked off of Twitter?

Posted
3 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Is Musk a "free speech absolutist"?  My answer to Reich (I must point out an appropriate name for somebody advocating censorship) is probably not.  But Musk is a lot closer to that than Reich who holds a view that free speech he doesn't agree with is a threat.  

 

FIFY

Posted
1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

****

 

Twitter not allowing a lying jack ass to post on their site is like a publish8ng company not agreeing to market a book by Nazis 

 

Whats the difference? 

Twitter isn't a publisher and gets special protections because of that.  They then act like a publisher to take away the voices of people who don't agree, thus breaking the rules hence they should lose their special protections as they are now a publisher.

 

That's the difference.

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

If you don't support the principle that others, especially others with which you vehemently disagree, be allowed to express their views freely, then you don't believe in free speech.

 

Period.

 

We now know that idiots like @Tiberius and @BillStime do not support free speech. 

 

 

  • Agree 2
Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

 

Full panic mode

 

 

 

Edited by Big Blitz
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
On 3/18/2022 at 10:08 AM, JDHillFan said:

I never should have asked you to dumb it down. That’s on me. Carry on. 

Never ask dummy to dumb something down.

Posted
2 hours ago, DRsGhost said:

If you don't support the principle that others, especially others with which you vehemently disagree, be allowed to express their views freely, then you don't believe in free speech.

 

Period.

 

We now know that idiots like @Tiberius and @BillStime do not support free speech. 

 

They're all for "free speech," as long as it's what they agree with.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

They're all for "free speech," as long as it's what they agree with.  

 

In other words they don't believe in the principle of free speech.

 

And that's fine. As long as you are honest about it and own it.

 

But they aren't honest and don't own their anti-free speech values.

 

Edited by DRsGhost
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 3
Posted
4 hours ago, DRsGhost said:

If you don't support the principle that others, especially others with which you vehemently disagree, be allowed to express their views freely, then you don't believe in free speech.

 

Period.

 

We now know that idiots like @Tiberius and @BillStime do not support free speech. 

 

 

A publisher does not have to publish your article, book or tweet. Cry all you want, free speech does not mean you have a right to others publications, platforms or pages

  • Dislike 1
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, DRsGhost said:

If you don't support the principle that others, especially others with which you vehemently disagree, be allowed to express their views freely, then you don't believe in free speech.

 

Period.

 

We now know that idiots like @Tiberius and @BillStime do not support free speech. 

 

 


LAMP


Meanwhile - the cult, composing of the Party of Hypocrisy, does not practice what they preach.

 

Caasdfpture.thumb.JPG.c1d0abcca33527b540a6ef11c413924c.JPG

Edited by BillStime
  • Dislike 1
×
×
  • Create New...