Tenhigh Posted April 14, 2022 Posted April 14, 2022 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: **** Twitter not allowing a lying jack ass to post on their site is like a publish8ng company not agreeing to market a book by Nazis Whats the difference? You got kicked off of Twitter?
Doc Posted April 14, 2022 Posted April 14, 2022 3 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said: Is Musk a "free speech absolutist"? My answer to Reich (I must point out an appropriate name for somebody advocating censorship) is probably not. But Musk is a lot closer to that than Reich who holds a view that free speech he doesn't agree with is a threat. FIFY
Demongyz Posted April 14, 2022 Posted April 14, 2022 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: **** Twitter not allowing a lying jack ass to post on their site is like a publish8ng company not agreeing to market a book by Nazis Whats the difference? Twitter isn't a publisher and gets special protections because of that. They then act like a publisher to take away the voices of people who don't agree, thus breaking the rules hence they should lose their special protections as they are now a publisher. That's the difference. 1 1
BillsFanNC Posted April 14, 2022 Author Posted April 14, 2022 If you don't support the principle that others, especially others with which you vehemently disagree, be allowed to express their views freely, then you don't believe in free speech. Period. We now know that idiots like @Tiberius and @BillStime do not support free speech. 2
BillsFanNC Posted April 14, 2022 Author Posted April 14, 2022 This guy has been on fire of late. Absolutely 100% spot on. 2 2
Big Blitz Posted April 14, 2022 Posted April 14, 2022 (edited) 19 minutes ago, B-Man said: Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Full panic mode Edited April 14, 2022 by Big Blitz 1 1
Wacka Posted April 14, 2022 Posted April 14, 2022 On 3/18/2022 at 10:08 AM, JDHillFan said: I never should have asked you to dumb it down. That’s on me. Carry on. Never ask dummy to dumb something down.
Doc Posted April 14, 2022 Posted April 14, 2022 2 hours ago, DRsGhost said: If you don't support the principle that others, especially others with which you vehemently disagree, be allowed to express their views freely, then you don't believe in free speech. Period. We now know that idiots like @Tiberius and @BillStime do not support free speech. They're all for "free speech," as long as it's what they agree with. 1 1
BillsFanNC Posted April 14, 2022 Author Posted April 14, 2022 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Doc said: They're all for "free speech," as long as it's what they agree with. In other words they don't believe in the principle of free speech. And that's fine. As long as you are honest about it and own it. But they aren't honest and don't own their anti-free speech values. Edited April 14, 2022 by DRsGhost 1 3
Tiberius Posted April 14, 2022 Posted April 14, 2022 4 hours ago, DRsGhost said: If you don't support the principle that others, especially others with which you vehemently disagree, be allowed to express their views freely, then you don't believe in free speech. Period. We now know that idiots like @Tiberius and @BillStime do not support free speech. A publisher does not have to publish your article, book or tweet. Cry all you want, free speech does not mean you have a right to others publications, platforms or pages 1
BillStime Posted April 14, 2022 Posted April 14, 2022 (edited) 5 hours ago, DRsGhost said: If you don't support the principle that others, especially others with which you vehemently disagree, be allowed to express their views freely, then you don't believe in free speech. Period. We now know that idiots like @Tiberius and @BillStime do not support free speech. LAMP Meanwhile - the cult, composing of the Party of Hypocrisy, does not practice what they preach. Edited April 14, 2022 by BillStime 1
Recommended Posts