Jump to content
Message added by Hapless Bills Fan

Please tightly restrict conversation in this thread to football and football-relevant matters.

Two Bills Drive no longer finds it appropriate to engage in COVID-19 discussion in our main discussion areas. (This includes your opinion about the incubation/infectious period, interval before a positive test, and infection control measures the NFL should employ, and this means YOU.) We are a Buffalo Bills fan community and we exist to serve fans of the Buffalo Bills and the NFL. Please use other communities and venues to discuss heath-related topics including COVID-19. 

 

Information about COVID-19 is available from many globally respected sources including:

 

Uptodate     |  British Medical Journal Best Practice   |      COVIPENDIUM    |    Our world in Data

 

The pinned topic: COVID-19 - Facts and Information Only Topic, located on the Off the Wall subforum, is also a resource.   Should these not meet your needs, many other sources of information (of varied accuracy) exist.

 

Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, whatdrought said:

It seems pretty well believed that the Titans violated protocols... What's the point of adding new rules if we haven't seen any real punishment for old rule violation?

The latest communications from the league state that punishments for teams that protocol violations include forfeiture of games and draft choices.  I don't know that this was specified in the original policies developed by the league, but I think they mean business now. 

 

BTW, I checked the stat line for Hurst from the game.  He apparently didn't get too close the Buffalo's skill players that often.  He had one tackle and one assist.  It's the interior linemen who had most of the contact .

Edited by TigerJ
Posted

Geez, Folks. 17 posts in this thread have been removed for personal assumptions on coronavirus. You know who you are, cuz your posts don’t show. 

Please learn the tightrope walk.  It’s not that hard. 

 

Just don't look down.

😳

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, TigerJ said:

The latest communications from the league state that punishments for teams that protocol violations include forfeiture of games and draft choices.  I don't know that this was specified in the original policies developed by the league, but I think they mean business now. 

 

BTW, I checked the stat line for Hurst from the game.  He apparently didn't get too close the Buffalo's skill players that often.  He had one tackle and one assist.  It's the interior linemen who had most of the contact .

 

Unfortunately, the close contact of a defensive lineman with the OL is not well-measured by tackles/assists of the skill players.

 

4 hours ago, BillsCuse said:

Actually the test is from yesterday.  It takes a day to get the results - thats why they dont test on game day.

 

They can do POC  (point of care) tests. Now required for "outbreak" teams or those in contact with them (see YOLO post).

Posted
5 hours ago, inaugural balls said:

 

Endemic?

 

Pretty sure this is a panny not an enny.

 

Lol, it means established and spreading within the community.

 

To your point, this whole thing feels like an enny (or what I'd expect).

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, HardyBoy said:

 

Lol, it means established and spreading within the community.

 

To your point, this whole thing feels like an enny (or what I'd expect).

I always get lint in my enny.

Posted
4 hours ago, WideNine said:

Jeez... so contact-tracing a defensive lineman who test positive the day after a game.

 

So he was locked up with this guy, gang tackled that guy, was yelling in the grill of that guy.... 35 snaps worth....then jawing on the sideline with those guys.

 

I found this article from the Minn. Star-Tribune Oct. 2, which interviews the Vike's "Infection Control Officer" and details how the NFL is doing contact tracing within facilities and within the game.  Evidently it's very driven by the Kinexion devices they're all required to wear

 

-Every NFL player, coach and staff member in the 2020 season is outfitted with a proximity device — a “SafeTag sensor” — worn as a wristband, badge or in jerseys to record distance between devices and time in close contact.

-Close contact is defined by the NFL as being within six feet of someone for about 15 minutes, or direct physical contact during practices, games or team travel, or living in the same household, or handling uniforms, equipment or a shared object.

-Sugarman noted “a few moderate-risk contacts” within the Vikings from interactions before and after the game with Titans personnel, adding more coaches and staffers were identified as close contacts than players.

-“On a football field, you’re not going to have close contact, because the average football play lasts about six seconds. However, you do have continual contact for hours during a football game,” Sugarman said. [Note: I found this statement ambiguous.  If anyone can help me parse it, please do! Does he mean coaches in booth or reserve players on sideline sitting side by side for hours?]

-Sugarman called the Vikings’ situation a “case study,” in that sports are so far considered a low-risk activity to spread COVID-19, while football is “probably at the highest risk of all sports” to transmit the virus during play. He added three to five days after contact is generally the time frame in which the virus will show up on a test, meaning the Vikings will be awaiting test results for the next few days while returning to work.

So projecting from that to our Bills....if there were close contacts on the Bills exposed to Hurst during the Raiders game, the critical time interval for testing results will be Weds to Friday (will show up Thurs to Saturday).

 

 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, whatdrought said:

It seems pretty well believed that the Titans violated protocols... What's the point of adding new rules if we haven't seen any real punishment for old rule violation?

 

This is a guess.  Either

1) they didn't find that the infected Titans were infected thru the protocol violations thus they decided new infection control measures are necessary

2) upon examination, the protocol violations they found are league wide so they're throwing the hammer down league wide

Posted
6 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

-Close contact is defined by the NFL as being within six feet of someone for about 15 minutes.....

-“On a football field, you’re not going to have close contact, because the average football play lasts about six seconds. However, you do have continual contact for hours during a football game,” Sugarman said. [Note: I found this statement ambiguous.  If anyone can help me parse it, please do! Does he mean coaches in booth or reserve players on sideline sitting side by side for hours?]

 

I thought it meant a distinction from the odd definition of close contact.  The "close" part seems to indicate the consecutive length of time they are in contact, not the actual distance.  The Bills linemen would have had contact with him over the course of hours, but obviously not for 15 consecutive minutes, hence no "close contact" and instead "continual contact for hours".  Being 1 foot away from him for a minute isn't considered close contact, but being 5 feet away for 15 minutes is.

Posted
8 hours ago, whatdrought said:

It seems pretty well believed that the Titans violated protocols... What's the point of adding new rules if we haven't seen any real punishment for old rule violation?

 

I said previously rumors were flying that the Titans were inviting FAs off the street for tryouts without testing them first and this would explain why a position coach was the first to test positive.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, matter2003 said:

 

I said previously rumors were flying that the Titans were inviting FAs off the street for tryouts without testing them first and this would explain why a position coach was the first to test positive.

I just relistened to the podcast that provided the info given to the Vikes GM. It was a PS player who tested positive the day they were scheduled to leave for Minnesota (Saturday). He didn’t travel. Everyone else tested negative. There was a position coach (who we now know is Shane Bowen, also their de facto DC) who Had been in contact with that player, and then held a meeting in a confined area with other players without a mask. If what you say is true, and what Rick Spielman shared is true, they broke two protocols. The league was in Nashville doing a thorough  investigation so I’m sure this was uncovered. 
starts at 7:35 mark if interested 

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/spielman-and-hooley/id1477411788?i=1000493085026

Edited by YoloinOhio
×
×
  • Create New...