Q-baby! Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 1 hour ago, meazza said: There's only one person on this forum who engages with Q-Baby and it's @Chef Jim Wrong!
3rdnlng Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 On 10/5/2020 at 10:25 AM, Tiberius said: Oh no, not my man Billstime! Boo 😒 Be careful what you ask for. He could easily take your crown away from you.
KD in CA Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 On 10/5/2020 at 7:09 AM, SDS said: along with two others accounts and BillStime for 30 days. FWIW, he should have been first on the permanent list. 4 2 1
Chef Jim Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 2 hours ago, Q-baby! said: Thank you for your service! It’s not wise to ***** with someone who is not only adept at handling very sharp knives but also holds your digestive tract in the palm of their hands. 1
Chef Jim Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 1 hour ago, meazza said: There's only one person on this forum who engages with Q-Baby and it's @Chef Jim Sorry dad. 😁
3rdnlng Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 4 hours ago, 4merper4mer said: I didn't even know viruses had sheds. What do they put in there? Crayonz. 2
3rdnlng Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 4 hours ago, Crayola64 said: ummm is he a “pedophile lawyer” as you define it??? Or is that made up as well? god some people love to be persecuted. I think he was referring to his defense of pedophiles here. He's one of those who pooh-poohed every mention of sex trafficking and pedophilia. 1
Westside Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 Just now, 3rdnlng said: I think he was referring to his defense of pedophiles here. He's one of those who pooh-poohed every mention of sex trafficking and pedophilia. Yep, called it a hoax, I believe. 1
3rdnlng Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 44 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: It’s not wise to ***** with someone who is not only adept at handling very sharp knives but also holds your digestive tract in the palm of their hands. Normally I think you'd try to stay away from putting your whole hand up there. Too soon? 7 minutes ago, westside2 said: Yep, called it a hoax, I believe. Good guess. 1
Chef Jim Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 3 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Normally I think you'd try to stay away from putting your whole hand up there. Too soon? Well someone had to retrieve your car keys for you. Try the hook in the kitchen next time. 1
CarpetCrawler Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 1 hour ago, KD in CA said: FWIW, he should have been first on the permanent list. I'm still wondering who the other two are and why all the other names are mentioned but not theirs??? It kind of opens the door to questions. Could be innocent reasons, but at least they should have been explained then to remove doubt. It's like the Gilligan's Island theme song, it took a year to change "and the rest" to "the Professor and Maryann" 1 1
3rdnlng Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 Just now, CarpetCrawler said: I'm still wondering who the other two are and why all the other names are mentioned but not theirs??? It kind of opens the door to questions. Could be innocent reasons, but at least they should have been explained then to remove doubt. It's like the Gilligan's Island theme song, it took a year to change "and the rest" to "the Professor and Maryann" I don't think I've seen anything definitive stating that DR was actually banned. I'm hoping that he was one of the 30-day suspensions. 1
Westside Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 SDS and most of the mods are left leaning. It's no secret why more Trump supporters are suspended than the trolls on the left. It's sad really. Is it that hard to put your believes aside and be neutral when you're a mod? 2
Q-baby! Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 1 minute ago, westside2 said: SDS and most of the mods are left leaning. It's no secret why more Trump supporters are suspended than the trolls on the left. It's sad really. Is it that hard to put your believes aside and be neutral when you're a mod? Link? 1
TakeYouToTasker Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 I’m dangling here only because a moderator of this site chose to mischaracterize me publicly, in order to defame me. @Hapless Bills Fan No responses? 1
Westside Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 3 minutes ago, Q-baby! said: Link? Your still around, point proven.
Q-baby! Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 1 minute ago, westside2 said: Your still around, point proven. You’re.
Westside Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 3 minutes ago, Q-baby! said: You’re. still around, point proven. 1
Q-baby! Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 Just now, westside2 said: still around, point proven. Fake news! One person, that’s your proof? Weak!
Hapless Bills Fan Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 19 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: I’m dangling here only because a moderator of this site chose to mischaracterize me publicly, in order to defame me. @Hapless Bills Fan No responses? Tell you what, @TakeYouToTasker, how about if you post, in full (I'll verify) the full text of the warning you received and any PMs we exchanged at the time? Stand and Deliver on this I mischaracterized our interactions claim and the "you've been defamed" by me stuff. Otherwise, this analogy is all the response you get: You are a guest in someone's house. You are informed you are exposing them to possible legal action by your behavior towards another guest. It is pointed out that you have a universe of other things you could say and do that do not carry this potential. Do you 1) cease what you're doing, apologize, and move on (whether or not you believe it) 2) cease what you're doing and choose from said universe of other things you could say and do instead (whether or not you believe it) 3) insist that you are not, in fact, exposing the host to legal action by your behavior. Make a sophistical argument to support this and then start yelling that you, in fact, are the injured party? I put it out there that responsible, mature adult guests do 1) or 2) and that people who indulge in 3) to bolster their perception of a right to behave exactly as they choose on someone else's property are not very mature or desirable guests. I hope this response satisfies your need to dangle. 3
Recommended Posts