CarpetCrawler Posted October 6, 2020 Posted October 6, 2020 (edited) 6 hours ago, Rob's House said: This is just another example of you guys intentionally misrepresenting someone's words so as to feign indignation on the premise that their statement conveyed something other than its plain and obvious meaning. It's so typical. The feigned indignation will be the eventual ruin of this place. Once the authorities buy it, there's no going back. Sad. Edited October 7, 2020 by CarpetCrawler 1
Numark3 Posted October 6, 2020 Posted October 6, 2020 7 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said: I’ll return to address this, because you’re defaming me, which I was alerted to because you quoted my content. That’s a total mischaracterization of what I said, and the actions you took. Another poster, who claims to be a lawyer, was making a defense of a pedophile. Lawyering for pedophiles. The way lawyers are described in the English language are predicate. Constitutional lawyer. Corporate lawyer. Family lawyer. Divorce lawyer. Immigration lawyer. Personal injury lawyer. Bankruptcy lawyer. Estate planning lawyer. Criminal lawyer. Pedophile lawyer. I made it quite clear in that thread that I was not naming him a pedophile, stating so directly, including directly to him, many times; even going so far as to defend him from people who actually called him a pedophile. The English language and clear context of that thread are evidence of this. The assertion that this somehow jeopardized SDS, and this site, legally is absurd. You acted on bias, ignored context and language, didn’t give me the opportunity to address any of it, and then ham handedly threatened me with a perma-ban, saying I was on a short leash. Let’s stick to facts, shall we? As to me saying decisions like the ones being made should hurt? They should. This board is Scott’s property, but he’s choosing to alienate a large portion of the community he claims to want to foster. Those people should remember this, and treat him accordingly. ummm is he a “pedophile lawyer” as you define it??? Or is that made up as well? 2 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said: He’s the owner of the site, and the sole individual responsible for policies and decisions which have targeted conservatives and their view points. He is the sole proprietor. Of course it’s about him personally. He personally made the decisions. Conservatives should let people know exactly how Scott runs his business. god some people love to be persecuted.
RochesterRob Posted October 6, 2020 Posted October 6, 2020 33 minutes ago, Q-baby! said: Sorry that your 25 member nutbar circle jerk is just not the same anymore. Whoa! Projecting your fantasies here for all to see?
Q-baby! Posted October 6, 2020 Posted October 6, 2020 23 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Because it shows to all the only reason you are here. What reason is that? To make fun of pussies? Not everyone is as tough as chef Jim and survived the dangers of culinary life! 😂😂😂 1 1
Chef Jim Posted October 6, 2020 Posted October 6, 2020 8 minutes ago, Q-baby! said: What reason is that? To make fun of pussies? Not everyone is as tough as chef Jim and survived the dangers of culinary life! 😂😂😂 Really? Is that why you feel you're here. You need another hobby. This one is kind of sad. And I would be surprised if you lasted a week in a professional kitchen.
Q-baby! Posted October 6, 2020 Posted October 6, 2020 7 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Really? Is that why you feel you're here. You need another hobby. This one is kind of sad. And I would be surprised if you lasted a week in a professional kitchen. 😂😂😂
Chef Jim Posted October 6, 2020 Posted October 6, 2020 25 minutes ago, Q-baby! said: 😂😂😂 It's a bit different that sitting by your smoker drinking beer and scratching your ass.
Q-baby! Posted October 6, 2020 Posted October 6, 2020 8 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: It's a bit different that sitting by your smoker drinking beer and scratching your ass. Thank you for your service! 1
meazza Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 There's only one person on this forum who engages with Q-Baby and it's @Chef Jim 3
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 1 minute ago, meazza said: There's only one person on this forum who engages with Q-Baby and it's @Chef Jim I sure as hell don't 2
meazza Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 3 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said: I sure as hell don't One of the only intelligent things you do. I kid I kid. 1 2
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 10 minutes ago, meazza said: One of the only intelligent things you do. I kid I kid. I'd respond with a rare Pepe, but wouldn't want to be accused of having hate in my heart. 1
meazza Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 4 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said: I'd respond with a rare Pepe, but wouldn't want to be accused of having hate in my heart. Exactly. We're all walking a fine line here.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 4 minutes ago, meazza said: Exactly. We're all walking a fine line here. My own personal moderator gave me a stern talking to about just that topic.
meazza Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 2 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said: My own personal moderator gave me a stern talking to about just that topic. Is that why you put a pic of a guy with a machine gun? As a show of force?
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 1 minute ago, meazza said: Is that why you put a pic of a guy with a machine gun? As a show of force? Nah. He's posing in front of a classic "fall of empire" painting. 1
LB3 Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 4 hours ago, SectionC3 said: Hoax. What do you call a priest who ministers to pedophiles? A priest who ministers to pedophiles. What do you call a priest who is a pedophile? A pedophile priest. And, for what it’s worth, I have never, in my decades in this profession, heard the phrase “pedophile lawyer.” Not once. Have a nice day, hoaxer. Clearly he wasn't accusing you. Now that we got that out of the way, if you're looking for work, which based on how much you've posted since March you must be. Here's a former Dem candidate you might be able to help. 😉 1 1
SectionC3 Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 10 minutes ago, LB3 said: Clearly he wasn't accusing you. Now that we got that out of the way, if you're looking for work, which based on how much you've posted since March you must be. Here's a former Dem candidate you might be able to help. 😉 Hoax.
meazza Posted October 7, 2020 Posted October 7, 2020 8 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Hoax. Are you really going there ?
Recommended Posts