Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, meazza said:

 

It's scary really that people feel this way.  I've seen purely political message boards and those contain the worst of the worst.  Nazi's, commies, etc.   No one wants to really talk to those idiots but you have a relatively friendly message board with left & right of center views with a few extremes and we need to shut it down. 

 

Exactly. For all the aspersions cast upon this board by those who rarely frequent it, the level of discourse is usually a cut above what you'll find across most of the internet. And while some of us have takes on issues that may occasionally flirt with the fringe 0:) we don't have any regulars who are all that extreme, with the possible exception of the guy who thinks all cops are terrorists. 

 

AD was the perfect mod because he is extremely tolerant of views he finds absurd, but will cast out the few who attempt to bring the board down.

 

The bottom line is, if the Shoshins of the world are honestly looking for a thoughtful debate they can find it here. Ironically, the only people who may have difficulty finding such a thing are those that entertain the possibility that Orange Man might not be so bad.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 minute ago, meazza said:


Best to ignore the riddler. You’ll live longer.


I normally do as I can’t understand what he’s on, but this was a clear concise sentence from him.       Shut it down because I embarrassed myself 🤷🏼‍♂️🤷🏼‍♂️🥴

Posted
48 minutes ago, shoshin said:

 

We had this discussion here. Most here want to keep it. I think it's time to flush PPP and it's not because of something that happened in the last 3 months--when you started PPP my understanding is that it was a place for the Bills fans to talk politics. It's since become its own thing, for worse, whether it's liberal trolls, pizzagate believers, massive content retweeters and news pasters, etc. And there are so many political outlets these days. 

 

 

 

When someone tells you so plainly what he is, believe him. If you have a problem with PPP, don't come here and spew your horror and distaste about the place. Just stay away and don't come here to try to press your cancel culture on everybody else. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
1 minute ago, realtruelove said:

It's baffling to me why some here would like PPP taken down.  Why not just leave?  Seems like common sense?

That is the problem with ideology. Pragmatism is expunged from the record.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

You know there's a problem when life long Democrats want the trolls gone,not just the people on the right. I lost track how many times I've been called a racist or a nazi because I had a different opinion. Yet, here they still are, bragging and boasting about how everyone else should behave. It's pretty disgusting. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, Rob's House said:

 

At least your being very transparent about your utter disdain for free speech.

Apparently understanding what free speech is and is not is a really hard concept for the right to grasp. 

You think it allows you to say and do anything you want on a private message board.
But you think it's ok for police to assault the press, shoot people in the face and use chemical weapons on them at peaceful protests.

The level of cognitive dissonance on display from your crowd is staggering.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, BullBuchanan said:

Apparently understanding what free speech is and is not is a really hard concept for the right to grasp. 

You think it allows you to say and do anything you want on a private message board.
But you think it's ok for police to assault the press, shoot people in the face and use chemical weapons on them at peaceful protests.

The level of cognitive dissonance on display from your crowd is staggering.

This from the guy who wants President Trump to die from Covid-19. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

This from the guy who wants President Trump to die from Covid-19. 

I do. What's your point?

Do you need a definition of a term or are you just stumbling around your house upset that I think your Cheetolini would better serve the world if he were six feet under.

This is like the 5th time you've brought it up in unrelated conversation. You sound like an idiot. 

Edited by BullBuchanan
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
5 hours ago, GG said:

 

Except that the new bots had nothing to do with building up this board over 20 years, and everything to do with blowing it up in 6 momths.

 

This is a microcosm of the socialist rhetoric, thinking that things just appear out of nowhere, and tearing thing down will lead to a better outcome, even after you chase away people who build things.  Enjoy your victory.

 

Bye bye.  

 

Well then, don't keep showing up and promising to leave, "just do it"!   :doh:

 

5 hours ago, Reality Check said:

The posters who began their accounts in March of 2017 are exceptional. They are among the very best.

 

Says the newbie who joined in November 2019 and who laughs at the deaths of 210,000+ Americans from the coronavirus. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

Apparently understanding what free speech is and is not is a really hard concept for the right to grasp. 

You think it allows you to say and do anything you want on a private message board.
But you think it's ok for police to assault the press, shoot people in the face and use chemical weapons on them at peaceful protests.

The level of cognitive dissonance on display from your crowd is staggering.


Sound the kook alert 🚨🚨🚨

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

I do. What's your point?

Do you need a definition of a term or are you just stumbling around your house upset that I think your Cheetolini would better serve the world if he were six feet under.

This is like the 5th time you've brought it up in unrelated conversation. You sound like an idiot. 

Read over what you stated in the what I quoted. It was not an unrelated conversation. 

 

"Apparently understanding what free speech is and is not is a really hard concept for the right to grasp. 

You think it allows you to say and do anything you want on a private message board."

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Read over what you stated in the what I quoted. It was not an unrelated conversation. 

 

"Apparently understanding what free speech is and is not is a really hard concept for the right to grasp. 

You think it allows you to say and do anything you want on a private message board."

Again, you seem to be confused. I'm under no illusion that this is a private message board and I can be censored or have people oppose what I say without it being against my "free speech".

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

Apparently understanding what free speech is and is not is a really hard concept for the right to grasp. 

You think it allows you to say and do anything you want on a private message board.
But you think it's ok for police to assault the press, shoot people in the face and use chemical weapons on them at peaceful protests.

The level of cognitive dissonance on display from your crowd is staggering.

Lock her up! 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

Apparently understanding what free speech is and is not is a really hard concept for the right to grasp. 


You think it allows you to say and do anything you want on a private message board.
But you think it's ok for police to assault the press, shoot people in the face and use chemical weapons on them at peaceful protests.

The level of cognitive dissonance on display from your crowd is staggering.

 

The irony here is staggering. Let me take these one by one for you:

 

Free speech allows you to communicate the facts and opinions you choose to. The fact that it's a private message board means only that the owner of the message board has the right to abridge free speech if he sees fit. In this case the OWNER of the private message board has allowed free speech to exist in this forum. A relatively new poster is now lobbying him to change that.

 

And I've never supported police doing any of the things you've listed, although you and I have vastly different definitions of "peaceful protests." That topic can be discussed in the appropriate thread. No need to hijack this one.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Rob's House said:

 

The irony here is staggering. Let me take these one by one for you:

 

Free speech allows you to communicate the facts and opinions you choose to. The fact that it's a private message board means only that the owner of the message board has the right to abridge free speech if he sees fit. In this case the OWNER of the private message board has allowed free speech to exist in this forum. A relatively new poster is now lobbying him to change that.

 

And I've never supported police doing any of the things you've listed, although you and I have vastly different definitions of "peaceful protests." That topic can be discussed in the appropriate thread. No need to hijack this one.

Add "irony" to the list of words you don't use correctly.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Rob's House said:

 

The irony here is staggering. Let me take these one by one for you:

 

Free speech allows you to communicate the facts and opinions you choose to. The fact that it's a private message board means only that the owner of the message board has the right to abridge free speech if he sees fit. In this case the OWNER of the private message board has allowed free speech to exist in this forum. A relatively new poster is now lobbying him to change that.

 

And I've never supported police doing any of the things you've listed, although you and I have vastly different definitions of "peaceful protests." That topic can be discussed in the appropriate thread. No need to hijack this one.

4havmj.jpg

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

 

 

 

11 minutes ago, Rob's House said:

 

The irony here is staggering. Let me take these one by one for you:

 

Free speech allows you to communicate the facts and opinions you choose to. The fact that it's a private message board means only that the owner of the message board has the right to abridge free speech if he sees fit. In this case the OWNER of the private message board has allowed free speech to exist in this forum. A relatively new poster is now lobbying him to change that.

 

And I've never supported police doing any of the things you've listed, although you and I have vastly different definitions of "peaceful protests."  in 


You children want to cry about your "free speech"? This is what an outright assault on free speech looks like.


Where were you?

 

 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...