Jump to content
Message added by Hapless Bills Fan

Please keep discussion in this thread narrowly focused on football and directly football-related issues.

 

Two Bills Drive no longer finds it appropriate to engage in COVID-19 discussion in our main discussion areas. We are a Buffalo Bills fan community and we exist to serve fans of the Buffalo Bills and the NFL. Please use other communities and venues to discuss heath-related topics including COVID-19. 

 

Information about COVID-19 is available from many globally respected sources including:

 

Uptodate     |  British Medical Journal Best Practice   |      COVIPENDIUM    |    Our world in Data

 

The pinned topic: COVID-19 - Facts and Information Only Topic, located on the Off the Wall subforum, is also a resource.   Should these not meet your needs, many other sources of information (of varied accuracy) exist.

 

Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
15 minutes ago, Rochesterfan said:


 

PS players they can do, but remember with COVID - it is about 5 days before an off the street signing can get into the building.  So they can’t even supplement by signing guys without giving almost a week to just daily testing.


still, this isn’t a ton of players. 
 

I would be curious when designing the enhanced practice squad how many positives the league would have allowed a game to continue with.

Posted

So what are the rules WRT roster moves due to Covid?  Normally to activate someone from the PS there needs to be a roster opening so you'd have to waive/release an active player, so he could be then signed by another team.  Is there some type of exemption for any players who test positive?  Can they can be removed from active roster with no ability to be poached, then once healthy moved back to active roster again with PS players now being denoted and again can't be lost to another team?   Tenn have close to ten players right now positive, no way they can just make them inactive for game, they need replacements.

 

Without something like that, don't see how using PS players helps at all.

Posted
19 minutes ago, Ed_Formerly_of_Roch said:

So what are the rules WRT roster moves due to Covid?  Normally to activate someone from the PS there needs to be a roster opening so you'd have to waive/release an active player, so he could be then signed by another team.  Is there some type of exemption for any players who test positive?  Can they can be removed from active roster with no ability to be poached, then once healthy moved back to active roster again with PS players now being denoted and again can't be lost to another team?   Tenn have close to ten players right now positive, no way they can just make them inactive for game, they need replacements.

 

Without something like that, don't see how using PS players helps at all.


 

The players go on the COVID IR (essentially putting people on the IR list for 3 weeks). That opens the roster spots.

 

27 minutes ago, NoSaint said:


still, this isn’t a ton of players. 
 

I would be curious when designing the enhanced practice squad how many positives the league would have allowed a game to continue with.

 

I would assume up to about 10 players - although I believe someone stated that the league mentioned postponing games if a team was hit all in one position group because the PS would not be able to cover if a whole position became impacted - for example 5WRs - the PS might have 2 - so the NFL would have to look at options.

Posted
34 minutes ago, Rochesterfan said:


 

The players go on the COVID IR (essentially putting people on the IR list for 3 weeks). That opens the roster spots.

 

 

I would assume up to about 10 players - although I believe someone stated that the league mentioned postponing games if a team was hit all in one position group because the PS would not be able to cover if a whole position became impacted - for example 5WRs - the PS might have 2 - so the NFL would have to look at options.


they already postponed for less than that though is my point. If this was across the line I’m curious where the line was but maybe there’s extenuating circumstances like ignoring protocol making them particularly high risk

Posted
3 minutes ago, NoSaint said:


they already postponed for less than that though is my point. If this was across the line I’m curious where the line was but maybe there’s extenuating circumstances like ignoring protocol making them particularly high risk


 

I think the postponement this weekend was because people keep coming up positive and they wanted to keep the Titans apart to prevent additional spreading. 
 

I don’t think the numbers were the problem.

 

The initial plan sounded like if they had no more positives - they would have played Monday afternoon.  Having 5 additional players test positive through out this week emphasizes that they needed to keep the players apart to prevent a larger outbreak and they needed to keep them apart 8-10 days - until next Monday or Tuesday- then they can deal with replacement players.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Rochesterfan said:


 

I think the postponement this weekend was because people keep coming up positive and they wanted to keep the Titans apart to prevent additional spreading. 
 

I don’t think the numbers were the problem.

 

The initial plan sounded like if they had no more positives - they would have played Monday afternoon.  Having 5 additional players test positive through out this week emphasizes that they needed to keep the players apart to prevent a larger outbreak and they needed to keep them apart 8-10 days - until next Monday or Tuesday- then they can deal with replacement players.


right.

 

but with your guess if 10, how do you suppose they get to 8 and play if they pull the plug here?

 

are you picturing 8 positives spread across the roster on Monday and then nothing else? 
 

it just feels like you have to expect a few coming back across a couple days once you open the door for COVID In the building 

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, whatdrought said:

Unfortunately it's starting to sound like spread within the locker room beyond initial contact... bad news. 

Brutal news.

The 2nd wave is beginning in the country in general. 

 

On the bright side, the mortality rates for players age range is extremely low,  I'm more worried about older coaches , praying for all involved,  including our great President and First Lady .

 

 

Edited by JerseyBills
Posted
5 minutes ago, whatdrought said:

Unfortunately it's starting to sound like spread within the locker room beyond initial contact... bad news. 

 

Certainly does, as there are plenty of different position guys with it. A couple of WRs, LB, DL, CB and Long Snapper, and a couple of PS guys (TE and CB).

 

One position coach and half a dozen other team personnel.

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2020/10/02/adam-humphries-cameron-batson-placed-on-titans-covid-19-list/

 

Cases on the Titans need to stop cropping up asap, if the Bills game isn't going to be put in doubt also.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
45 minutes ago, NoSaint said:


right.

 

but with your guess if 10, how do you suppose they get to 8 and play if they pull the plug here?

 

are you picturing 8 positives spread across the roster on Monday and then nothing else? 
 

it just feels like you have to expect a few coming back across a couple days once you open the door for COVID In the building 


 

I guess I don’t get what you are asking at all.

 

I believe if the initial group on Monday had been even up to 8 or so players and then the rest of this week saw no more positives (so it was 1 exposure at 1 point and time) - the NFL talked about closing the Titans facility until Saturday and then moving the Pittsburgh game to Monday or Tuesday.

 

Once they got additional positives on Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday - now they now that it was not a single exposure, but small groups exposing other small groups - which suggests they may not be strictly following protocol.  This has forced the NFL to keep the facility closed until at least Monday or Tuesday.  The NFL is also bringing in some experts to review the exposures to find out if this was truly them not following protocol or an unfortunate accident.  I expect fines, maybe draft pick losses if they determine protocol was severely broken.

 

If at this point the Titans have it under control- I would think the players will go on IR and the team will activate replacements from the PS and our game will go on.  If more players continue to become positive - which could happen based on some people 8 day incubation or if some players are getting together outside of the facility and spreading it - then I would assume the NFL will keep the Facility closed and have to make a decision on whether to postpone the Bills game or maybe choose to force Tennessee to forfeit some games.  The NFL owners and NFLPA discussed a bunch of options prior to the season - we will see how it plays out.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Rochesterfan said:


 

The players go on the COVID IR (essentially putting people on the IR list for 3 weeks). That opens the roster spots.

 

 

I would assume up to about 10 players - although I believe someone stated that the league mentioned postponing games if a team was hit all in one position group because the PS would not be able to cover if a whole position became impacted - for example 5WRs - the PS might have 2 - so the NFL would have to look at options.

 

OK yes forgot about the Covid IR designation.  So when the players come back can their replacements go back to PS without exposure to waiver claims by other teams?  Certainly going to hurt Tenn if they lose these players for 3 weeks.  Just hearing everything going on today in the news, they could be healthy enough to come back in 10 days if mild cases, but will be required to sit 3 weeks.

Posted

At this point isn't this ideal for Buffalo? The time frame to me seems to ensure they get all the infected Titans isolated and in the meanwhile the Titans can't use this unexpected bye for extra practices.

 

Right?

 

I can't see our game against them being in jeopardy with the 11 or 12 days between the shutting down of the Titans completely and our game against them.

 

Right?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, transplantbillsfan said:

At this point isn't this ideal for Buffalo? The time frame to me seems to ensure they get all the infected Titans isolated and in the meanwhile the Titans can't use this unexpected bye for extra practices.

 

Right?

 

I can't see our game against them being in jeopardy with the 11 or 12 days between the shutting down of the Titans completely and our game against them.

 

Right?

 

 

Correct. 

 

They've kept everyone away from each other since Monday.  

 

I think they will be told the first time they can meet together will be Thursday the 8th for practice.  That's 10 plus days since being with each other and shutting down.   

 

No positives by then, we're playing. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

I'm most concerned about going forward later in the season when there aren't bye weeks to flex into.  If a team who has already been through their bye week (naturally or by rescheduling) has a game the next week against a team that suddenly has an outbreak, what do they do?  Will they be awarded the win by default or do they push back the playoffs a week and add a week 18 to flex in another reschedule?  You'd either have to push the season back a week to give unaffected teams a second bye week, or have the top seeds have two weeks off through the wild card round.

Posted
2 hours ago, Big Blitz said:

 

 

Correct. 

 

They've kept everyone away from each other since Monday.  

 

I think they will be told the first time they can meet together will be Thursday the 8th for practice.  That's 10 plus days since being with each other and shutting down.   

 

No positives by then, we're playing. 

Or, our game vs them is moved and we have 10 days to prep for chef, who will have 3 plus travel. I don’t know what the nfl’s contingency plan is now that titans bye week is taken but they must have one. Move the playoffs back a week? So many questions. 

 

 

Posted
12 hours ago, Ed_Formerly_of_Roch said:

 

OK yes forgot about the Covid IR designation.  So when the players come back can their replacements go back to PS without exposure to waiver claims by other teams?  Certainly going to hurt Tenn if they lose these players for 3 weeks.  Just hearing everything going on today in the news, they could be healthy enough to come back in 10 days if mild cases, but will be required to sit 3 weeks.

As I understand it, teams can protect four practice squad players each week regardless of experiencing COVID-19 among team personnel.  The four are to be named prior to the game.  Having to call up more practice squad players than that because of COVID would not change the numbers.  However, I suspect that NFL GMs probably would not be out to gut another team's PS.  I think they might refrain from legally poaching another team's PS when that team is dealing with COVID.

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...